The Humans garnered generally favorable reception from critics.
Electronic Gaming Monthlys four editors commended the game's take on the
Lemmings formula and the high level of challenge in later levels, but found its slow pace aggravating, especially since a single mistake can force an entire level to be restarted.
AllGames Michael L. House praised the game for its fun graphics, soundtrack, and replay value, but noted that some of the puzzles were devilishly designed and criticized the lack of unique sound effects.
Computer Gaming Worlds Chuck Miller found the game charming and liked the background music, but felt that the limited color palette of its visuals was more like that of a console title than a PC product, and that the difficulty increases too quickly. David Sears of
Game Players PC Entertainment considered it a very playable game, commending its soundtrack and the fluid animation of the humans, but expressed mixed thoughts regarding the overall graphical presentation and felt that it borrowed heavily from
Lemmings.
VideoGames & Computer Entertainments David N. Eadington proclaimed that "
Lemmings succeeded largely because it combined constant action with solid puzzles; the lack of speed and the repetitiveness of
The Humans should limit its appeal".
Nintendo The Game Boy version was met with average reception. The Atari Jaguar version was met with average critical sentiments. According to internal documentation from Atari, the Jaguar version had sold 18,771 copies by April 1, 1995. The Atari Falcon version was generally well-received.
Atari Worlds Nial Grimes praised the Falcon version for being a "perfect" conversion of the Jaguar version, but questioned the game's long-term playability, stating that it would take a special kind of person to play it from start to finish. Kay Tennemann of German publication
ST-Computer commended the Falcon version for its overall visual presentation, but faulted its soundscapes for being lacking. Tristan Collet of the French
ST Magazine gave the Falcon version positive remarks for its engaging gameplay, good longevity, and humour, but criticized its overall technical performance. == Legacy ==