The book received mixed reviews in various newspapers and journals. Reviewing
The Master and His Emissary in the
American Journal of Psychiatry, Jacob Freedman wrote the book “valiantly addresses the effect hemispheric asymmetry has had on Western civilization" and that it chronicled "how the left brain's determined
reductionism and the right brain's insightful and holistic approach have shaped music, language, politics, and art." A review by
Bryan Appleyard in
Times Online described the book as suggesting "we are thinking more and more like machines, and risk losing what makes us human", while David Cox in the
Evening Standard wrote that the author "shows convincingly that the degeneracy of the West springs from our failure to manage the binary division of our brains." In a positive review in
The Guardian, the philosopher
Mary Midgley wrote that the book "points out the complexity, the divided nature of thought itself and asks about its connection with the structure of the brain," and that "though neurologists may well not welcome it because it asks them new questions, the rest of us will surely find it splendidly thought-provoking." In the
Times Literary Supplement,
W. F. Bynum wrote: "McGilchrist's careful analysis of how brains work is a veritable tour de force, gradually and skilfully revealed. I know of no better exposition of the current state of functional brain neuroscience." In a mixed review in
Literary Review, the philosopher
A. C. Grayling wrote that the book was "beautifully written, erudite, fascinating and adventurous," but added that "the findings of brain science are nowhere near fine-grained enough yet to support the large psychological and cultural conclusions Iain McGilchrist draws." Likewise, the psychologist
Michael Corballis said of the work, that "Although widely acclaimed, this book goes far beyond the neurological facts."
Owen Flanagan alleged many shortcomings of the book and delivered a dismissive statement: "The fact is, hemispheric differences are not well understood. Neither are patterns over 2,500 years of western history. Trying to explain the ill-understood latter with a caricature of the former does little to illuminate either." McGilchrist wrote scathingly of this review, saying: "But anyone who has read my book and reads that review will realise what a shameful piece of writing it is," picking on what he alleges to be evidence of superficiality and misrepresentation. The book has inspired a documentary,
The Divided Brain, authorised by McGilchrist. ==Editions==