George E. Gruen stated positive remarks about the book, arguing that the book provides the reader with very detailed account of Iran from 1918 to 1979 and of the
US-Iran relations during the related period. James A. Bill adds that the book offers the reader an opportunity to fully understand the underlying mechanisms of the Iranian revolution. However, he also stated that some of Milani's points in the book are either contradictory or overemphasized. Mostafa Rahimi, in his review in
Jahān-e Ketāb, a journal founded in post-1979 Iran, claimed that Milani's book attempts to present Hoveyda as an intellectual, arguing that Hoveyda was just "a power-hungry politician". Another Iranian reviewer, Afshin Matin Asgari of
California State University, describes the topic of the book as controversial without giving his specific reference. For him, the book is "disappointing" due to the author's overt bias towards the subject and events narrated. He further argues that although the sources are mostly scientific, the informants whose reports are frequently cited are often family members such as Hoveyda's brother,
Fereydoun Hoveyda, and his former wife, Laila Emami. S. Cronin in his review also expresses similar views and argues that Milani did not adequately describe the harsh aspects of the Shah's regime. He also adds that the language used by Milani to describe the judges at the Hoveyda’s tribunal, such as
Sadeq Khalkhali, is so biased that it does not help the book in enhancing his main arguments. The book was reviewed in
Journal of Islamic Studies by Shahrough Akhavi, an
adjunct professor of
political science at
Columbia University and distinguished
professor emeritus of political science at the
University of South Carolina.{{cite web Persian edition of
Persian Sphinx was named book of the year by Deutsch Radio in 2002. ==References==