The Rolling Bridge could theoretically allow the passage of boats, but the small basin behind the bridge is not open to canal traffic – it is currently occupied by a fountain, and blocked by a steel barrier at surface level to prevent boats entering. It also has a very long cycle time, taking 2–3 minutes to finish moving in either direction, which compares unfavourably with traditional hand-operated canal footbridges and would cause delays on a waterway with frequent boat traffic. Finally, the detour around the open bridge is very short, so the crossing is arguably not required at all. Thus, the project is primarily
public art rather than a practical structure for navigation. For these reasons, the design disregards established principles of architecture and civil engineering such as
form follows function. A higher-profile water crossing in London also proposed by Heatherwick – the
Garden Bridge – attracted significant criticism along similar lines for mainly targeting tourists as a novelty, rather than functioning as a practical water crossing. =="Rolling" as a name and as a type==