After the development of quantum mechanics, two basic theories were proposed to provide a quantum description of chemical bonding:
valence bond (VB) theory and
molecular orbital (MO) theory. A more recent quantum description is given in terms of atomic contributions to the electronic density of states.
Comparison of VB and MO theories The two theories represent two ways to build up the
electron configuration of the molecule. For valence bond theory, the atomic
hybrid orbitals are filled with electrons first to produce a fully bonded valence configuration, followed by performing a linear combination of contributing structures (
resonance) if there are several of them. In contrast, for molecular orbital theory, a
linear combination of atomic orbitals is performed first, followed by filling of the resulting
molecular orbitals with electrons. At the qualitative level, both theories contain incorrect predictions. Simple (Heitler–London) valence bond theory correctly predicts the dissociation of homonuclear diatomic molecules into separate atoms, while simple (Hartree–Fock) molecular orbital theory incorrectly predicts dissociation into a mixture of atoms and ions. On the other hand, simple molecular orbital theory correctly predicts
Hückel's rule of aromaticity, while simple valence bond theory incorrectly predicts that cyclobutadiene has larger resonance energy than benzene. Although the wavefunctions generated by both theories at the qualitative level do not agree and do not match the stabilization energy by experiment, they can be corrected by
configuration interaction. COHP (Crystal orbital Hamilton population), and BCOOP (Balanced crystal orbital overlap population). To overcome this issue, an alternative formulation of the bond covalency can be provided in this way. The
mass center of an atomic orbital | n,l,m_l,m_s \rangle , with
quantum numbers for atom A is defined as :cm^\mathrm{A}(n,l,m_l,m_s)=\frac{\int\limits_{E_0}\limits^{E_1} E g_{|n,l,m_l,m_s\rangle}^\mathrm{A}(E) dE}{\int\limits_{E_0}\limits^{E_1} g_{|n,l,m_l,m_s\rangle}^\mathrm{A} (E)dE} where g_{|n,l,m_l,m_s\rangle}^\mathrm{A}(E) is the contribution of the atomic orbital |n,l,m_l,m_s \rangle of the atom A to the total electronic density of states of the solid :g(E)=\sum_\mathrm{A}\sum_{n, l}\sum_{m_l, m_s}{g_{|n,l,m_l,m_s\rangle}^\mathrm{A}(E)} where the outer sum runs over all atoms A of the unit cell. The energy window is chosen in such a way that it encompasses all of the relevant bands participating in the bond. If the range to select is unclear, it can be identified in practice by examining the molecular orbitals that describe the electron density along with the considered bond. The relative position {{tmath|C_{n_\mathrm{A}l_\mathrm{A},n_\mathrm{B}l_\mathrm{B} } }} of the mass center of | n_\mathrm{A},l_\mathrm{A}\rangle levels of atom A with respect to the mass center of | n_\mathrm{B},l_\mathrm{B}\rangle levels of atom B is given as :C_{n_\mathrm{A}l_\mathrm{A},n_\mathrm{B}l_\mathrm{B}}=-\left|cm^\mathrm{A}(n_\mathrm{A},l_\mathrm{A})-cm^\mathrm{B}(n_\mathrm{B},l_\mathrm{B})\right| where the contributions of the magnetic and spin quantum numbers are summed. According to this definition, the relative position of the A levels with respect to the B levels is :C_\mathrm{A,B}=-\left|cm^\mathrm{A}-cm^\mathrm{B}\right| where, for simplicity, we may omit the dependence from the principal quantum number in the notation referring to {{tmath|C_{n_\mathrm{A}l_\mathrm{A},n_\mathrm{B}l_\mathrm{B} }.}} In this formalism, the greater the value of {{tmath|C_\mathrm{A,B},}} the higher the overlap of the selected atomic bands, and thus the electron density described by those orbitals gives a more covalent bond. The quantity {{tmath|C_\mathrm{A,B} }} is denoted as the
covalency of the bond, which is specified in the same units of the energy . == Analogous effect in nuclear systems ==