While there are several effective methods to solve Thue equations (including using
Baker's method and Skolem's
p-adic method), these are not able to give the best theoretical bounds on the number of solutions. One may qualify an effective bound C(f,r) of the Thue equation f(x,y) = r by the parameters it depends on, and how "good" the dependence is. The best result known today, essentially building on pioneering work of
Bombieri and
Schmidt, gives a bound of the shape C(f,r) = C \cdot (\deg f)^{1 + \omega(r)}, where C is an
absolute constant (that is, independent of both f and r) and \omega(\cdot) is the number of distinct
prime factors of r. The most significant qualitative improvement to the theorem of Bombieri and Schmidt is due to
Stewart, who obtained a bound of the form C(f,r) = C \cdot (\deg f)^{1 + \omega(g)} where g is a divisor of r exceeding |r|^{3/4} in
absolute value. It is
conjectured that one may take the bound C(f,r) = C(\deg f); that is, depending only on the
degree of f but not its
coefficients, and completely independent of the integer r on the right hand side of the equation. This is a weaker form of a conjecture of
Stewart, and is a special case of the
uniform boundedness conjecture for rational points. This conjecture has been proven for "small" integers r, where smallness is measured in terms of the
discriminant of the form f, by various authors, including
Evertse,
Stewart, and
Akhtari. Stewart and
Xiao demonstrated a strong form of this conjecture, asserting that the number of solutions is absolutely bounded, holds on average (as r ranges over the interval |r| \leq Z with Z \rightarrow \infty). ==See also==