Nomination and confirmation During the
2008 presidential campaign, Geithner was rumored to be a possible choice for Treasury Secretary for both
John McCain and
Barack Obama. During his confirmation, it was disclosed that Geithner had not paid $35,000 in
Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes from 2001 through 2004 while working for the
International Monetary Fund. The IMF, as an international agency, did not withhold payroll taxes, but instead reimbursed the usual employer responsibility of these taxes to employees. Geithner received the reimbursements and paid the amounts received to the government, but had not paid the remaining half which would normally have been withheld from his pay. The issue, as well as other errors relating to past deductions and expenses, were noted during a 2006 audit by the
Internal Revenue Service. Geithner subsequently paid the additional taxes owed. In a statement to the
Senate Finance Committee, Geithner called the tax issues "careless", "avoidable", and "unintentional" errors. On January 26, 2009, the
U.S. Senate confirmed Geithner's appointment by a vote of 60–34. Geithner was sworn in as Treasury Secretary by Vice President
Joe Biden and witnessed by President Barack Obama. , then India's
finance minister, with Geithner in 2010
Bailouts Geithner had authority over the second
tranche of $350 billion from the $700 billion banking
bailout bill passed by Congress in October 2008. Under the Financial Stability Plan, he proposed to create a new investment fund to provide a market for the legacy loans and securities—the so-called "
toxic assets"—burdening the financial system, using a mix of taxpayer and private money. He also proposed expanding a lending program that would spend as much as $1 trillion to cover the decline in the issuance of securities backed by consumer loans. He further proposed to give banks new infusions of capital with which to lend. In exchange, banks would be required to cut the
salaries and perks of executives and sharply limit
dividends and
corporate acquisitions. The plan was criticized by
Nobel laureates Paul Krugman and
Joseph Stiglitz, a former
World Bank Chief Economist. The
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and
takeover of
Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac amounted a combined outflow of $620.3 billion in Treasury funds in the form of spending, investments, and loans. As of July 2016, $689 billion has been returned to the Treasury, primarily in the form of refunds provided by bailed-out companies and revenue from dividends.
AIG bonuses , 2009 Although President Obama expressed strong support for Geithner, outrage over hundreds of millions of dollars in
bonus payments (or
employee "retention" payments) by the
American International Group, which had received more than $170 billion in federal bailout aid, undermined public support in early 2009. In March 2009, AIG paid $165 million in bonuses to its financial products division, the unit responsible for the company's
near collapse the year prior, following $55 million paid to the same division in December 2008 and $121 million in bonus payments to senior executives. In early November 2008, a joint committee of the
Federal Reserve,
Ernst & Young, and AIG concluded that the bonus payments, which were in contracts predating the government takeover, could not be legally stopped. Later in March, Liddy requested that employees who received bonuses of more than $100,000 return half of the payment. At Geithner's urging, Liddy cut $9.6 million in payments to company's top 50 executives in half and tied the remainder to performance. Geithner and his predecessor, former Treasury Secretary
Henry Paulson, both appeared before the Committee on January 27. Geithner defended the bailout of AIG and the payments to the banks, while reiterating previous denials of any involvement in efforts to withhold details of the transactions. His testimony was met with skepticism and angry disagreement by House members of both parties.
Making Home Affordable In his book
Bailout: How Washington Abandoned Main Street While Rescuing Wall Street,
Neil Barofsky argues that Geithner never had the intention to utilize the
Home Affordable Modification Program as intended by Congress. Instead of providing relief for homeowners to avoid foreclosures, it was Geithner's plan that the bank should proceed with these foreclosures. Geithner said that he "estimates" that the banks "can handle ten million foreclosures, over time", and that HAMP "will help foam the runway for them" by “keeping the full flush of foreclosures from hitting the financial system all at the same time." As such, "banks participating in the program have rejected four million borrowers’ requests for help, or 72 percent of their applications, since the process began".
Citimortgage and
JPMorgan Chase were among the banks that refused the most HAMP claims. As such, the program only helped 887,001 people out of the over 4 Million people that were originally estimated to be able to benefit from the program.
China at the opening session of the first U.S.–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue on July 27, 2009 In written comments to the Senate Finance Committee during his confirmation hearings, Geithner stated that the new administration believed
China was "manipulating"
its currency and that the Obama administration would act "aggressively" using "all the diplomatic avenues" to change China's currency practices. The Obama administration would pressure China diplomatically to change this practice more strongly than the
George W. Bush Administration had done. The United States maintained that China's actions hurt American businesses and contributed to the
2008 financial crisis. Shortly after assuming his role as Secretary of the Treasury, Geithner met in Washington with Chinese Foreign Minister
Yang Jiechi. He told Yang that the U.S. attached great importance to
its relations with China and that U.S.–China cooperation was essential in order for the world economy to fully recover. On June 1, 2009, during a question-and-answer session following a speech at
Peking University, Geithner was asked by a student whether Chinese investments in U.S. Treasury debt were safe. His reply that they were "very safe" drew laughter from the audience. Geithner co-chaired the high-profile
U.S.–China Strategic and Economic Dialogue from July 27 to 28 in 2009 in Washington, D.C., and led the Economic Track for the U.S. side. In September 2011, Geithner told a forum that China had "made possible systematic stealing of intellectual property of American companies and have not been very aggressive to put in place the basic protections for property rights that every serious economy needs over time", a rebuke of longstanding policy on the part of China to demand patents and other intellectual property from companies that sought to produce their products in China. He furthered that China was acting "very, very aggressive in a strategy they started several decades ago", which he defined as the ultimatum of transferring technology or being unable to produce products in China.
Opposing extension of tax cuts In summer 2010,
The New York Times said Geithner "is President Obama's point man in opposing the extension of the
Bush tax cuts for the wealthy after their Dec. 31 expiration. ... [Geithner] has cited the projected $700 billion, 10-year cost of the tax cuts, and nonpartisan analyses that they do not stimulate the economy because the wealthy tend to save the additional money rather than spend it. 'I believe there is no credible argument to be made that the purpose of government is to borrow from future generations of Americans to finance an extension of tax cuts for the top 2 percent,' [he] said in a recent speech."
Fiscal cliff and debt limit negotiations Geithner was Obama's lead negotiator about the
fiscal cliff and the increase in the 2013
debt limit. For example, on December 5, 2012, Geithner confirmed leaks from the White House, Treasury Secretary Geithner told CNBC that the Obama Administration is "absolutely" willing to go over the fiscal cliff if Republicans refused to back off from their opposition to raising rates on wealthier Americans.
Criticism Geithner weathered criticism early in the Obama presidency, when Congressman
Connie Mack (R-FL) suggested he should resign over the AIG bonus scandal, and Alabama Senator
Richard Shelby said that Geithner was "out of the loop". Democrats largely joined Obama in supporting Geithner, and there was no serious talk of his losing his job from within the administration. In November 2009, Oregon Representative
Peter DeFazio, speaking for himself and some fellow members of the Progressive Caucus, suggested that both Geithner and
Lawrence Summers, the director of the
National Economic Council, should be fired in order to curtail unemployment and signal a new direction for the Obama administration's fiscal policy. When Geithner appeared in front of the
Congressional Joint Economic Committee that month, the ranking House Republican,
Kevin Brady of Texas, said to the secretary, "Conservatives agree that, as point person, you've failed. Liberals are growing in that consensus as well. Poll after poll shows the public has lost confidence in this president's ability to handle the economy. For the sake of our jobs, will you step down from your post?" Geithner defended his record, suggesting Brady was misrepresenting the situation and overestimating popular disapproval of his job performance. In June 2011,
The New Republic criticized Geithner from the left, arguing that he was and is overly concerned with the deficit at a time when, following the
Great Recession, the government should be pursuing stimulus; and as a result, it is possible that the
stimulus was smaller than it could have been. ==Post-Treasury career==