The International Treaty, and English and Scots acts of ratification of Union may be seen within a wider European context of increasing state centralisation during the late 17th and early 18th centuries, including the monarchies of
France,
Sweden,
Denmark-Norway and
Spain. While there were exceptions, such as the Dutch Republic or the
Republic of Venice, the trend was clear.
Exclusion Crisis and Glorious Revolution The dangers of the monarch using one parliament against the other first became apparent in 1647 and 1651. It resurfaced during the 1679 to 1681
Exclusion Crisis, caused by English resistance to the Catholic prince
James (later James II of England, James VII of Scots) succeeding his brother Charles II. James was sent to Edinburgh in 1681 as
Lord High Commissioner; in August, the Parliament of Scotland passed the Succession Act, confirming the divine right of kings, the rights of the natural heir "regardless of religion", the duty of all to swear allegiance to that king, and the Independence of the Scots Crown. It then went beyond ensuring James's succession to the Scots throne by explicitly stating the aim was to make his exclusion from the English throne impossible without "the fatall and dreadfull consequences of a civil war". The issue reappeared during the 1688 Dutch invasion and (subsequently entitled as "the
Glorious Revolution"). The English
Convention Parliament generally supported replacing James with his Protestant daughter
Mary, holding to their "legal fiction" that James, by fleeing to France, had abandoned his English subjects and "abdicated". They initially resisted making her Dutch husband
William of Orange joint ruler but relented, "fearing the return of James" only when William threatened to take his troops and fleet and return to the Netherlands, and Mary refused to rule without him.
William's Claim of Right In Scotland, it became a Constitutional issue. The fact that King James had not been present in Scotland meant that the question of abdication need not arise. On 4 April 1689 a Convention of the
Three Estates of Scotland (sister body to the Parliament of Scotland) declared that James "had acted irregularly" by assuming regal power (government) "without ever taking the Coronation Oath required by Scots Law". Thus, he had "FOREFALTED [forfeited] the Right to the Scots Crown, and the Scots Throne is become vacant". This was a fundamental difference; if the Parliament of Scotland could decide James had "Forfaulted" his Scots throne by actions having, in the words of the "Claim of Right" act 1689 "Invaded the fundamentall Constitution of the Kingdome and altered it from a legall limited monarchy To ane arbitrary despotick power". "Scots monarchs derived legitimacy from the Convention of the Estates", later declared a Parliament of Scotland, not God, thus ending the principle of divine right of kings. Enshrined in the Union with England Act 1707: Conflict over control of the kirk between
Presbyterians and
Episcopalians and William's position as a fellow Calvinist put him in a much stronger position. He originally insisted on retaining Episcopacy, and the
Committee of the Articles, an unelected body that controlled what legislation Parliament could debate. Both would have given the Crown far greater control than in England but he withdrew his demands due to the 1689–1692
Jacobite Rising. William's attempts to have the Claim of Right amended were directed through the "Court faction" which began arguing from 1699 onwards that: • The Convention of the Estates was not a parliament so the act did not really count as binding and • the Convention of the Estates was a parliament and so parliament could just rewrite it. A year and a half after William's death, the Parliament of Scotland "put a period on the end of that sentence" by passing an act which recognised the standing of the Convention of the Estates as a parliament in its own right and made it "high treason" to impugn its authority or to so much as suggest attempting to alter the Claim of Right. Here is the Claim of Right understood and upheld for its secular constitutional provisions quite as much as for its religious provisions.
English perspective in 1702 The English succession was provided for by the English
Act of Settlement 1701, which ensured that the monarch of England would be a Protestant member of the
House of Hanover. Until the union of parliaments, the Scottish throne might be inherited by a different successor after
Queen Anne, who had said in her first speech to the English parliament that a union was "very necessary".
Scottish perspective The Scottish economy was severely impacted by
privateers during the 1688–1697
Nine Years' War and the 1701
War of the Spanish Succession, with the
Royal Navy focusing on protecting English ships. This compounded the economic pressure caused by the
Darien scheme, and the
seven ill years of the 1690s, when 5–15% of the population died of starvation. The Scottish Parliament was promised financial assistance, protection for its maritime trade, and an end to economic restrictions on trade with England. The votes of the
Court party, influenced by Queen Anne's favourite,
James Douglas, 2nd Duke of Queensberry, combined with the majority of the
Squadrone Volante, were sufficient to ensure passage of the treaty. As for representation going forwards, Scotland was, in the new united parliament, only to get 45 MPs, one more than
Cornwall, and only 16 (unelected) peers in the
House of Lords. As the seat of the Scottish Parliament, demonstrators in Edinburgh feared the impact of its loss on the local economy. Elsewhere, there was widespread concern about the independence of the kirk, and possible tax rises. Virtually all of the print discourses of 1699–1706 spoke against incorporating union, creating the conditions for widespread rejection of the treaty in 1706 and 1707. In the wake of unionist proselytising in the autumn of 1706 and early 1707, many Scots were undecided about the prospect of a union. Rather, there was considerably more support in Scotland for a federal union with England than an incorporative one, similar to the devolved Scottish parliament that would be established within Britain nearly three centuries later. As the treaty passed through the Parliament of Scotland, opposition was voiced by petitions from shires, burghs, presbyteries and parishes. The
Convention of Royal Burghs claimed: According to Scottish historian
William Ferguson, the Acts of Union were a "political job" by England that was achieved by economic incentives, patronage and bribery to secure the passage of the Union treaty in the Scottish Parliament in order satisfy English political imperatives, with the union being unacceptable to the Scottish people, including both the
Jacobites and
Covenanters. The differences between Scottish were "subsumed by the same sort of patriotism or nationalism that first appeared in the
Declaration of Arbroath of 1320."
Ireland Ireland, though a kingdom under the same crown, was not included in the union. It remained a separate kingdom, unrepresented in Parliament, and was legally subordinate to Great Britain until the
Renunciation Act 1783. In July 1707 each House of the
Parliament of Ireland passed a congratulatory address to Queen Anne, praying that "May God put it in your royal heart to add greater strength and lustre to your crown, by a still more comprehensive Union". The British government did not respond to the invitation and an equal union between Great Britain and Ireland was out of consideration until the 1790s. The
union with Ireland finally came about on 1 January 1801. ==Treaty and passage of the 1707 acts==