Adjusting the source impedance or the load impedance, in general, is called "impedance matching". There are three ways to improve an impedance mismatch, all of which are called "impedance matching": • Devices intended to present an apparent load to the source of
Zload =
Zsource* (complex conjugate matching). Given a source with a fixed voltage and fixed source impedance, the
maximum power theorem says this is the only way to extract the maximum power from the source. • Devices intended to present an apparent load of
Zload =
Zline (complex impedance matching), to avoid echoes. Given a transmission line source with a fixed source impedance, this "reflectionless impedance matching" at the end of the transmission line is the only way to avoid reflecting echoes back to the transmission line. • Devices intended to present an apparent source resistance as close to zero as possible, or presenting an apparent source voltage as high as possible. This is the only way to maximize
energy efficiency, and so it is used at the beginning of electrical power lines. Such an
impedance bridging connection also minimizes
distortion and
electromagnetic interference; it is also used in modern audio amplifiers and signal-processing devices. There are a variety of devices used between a source of energy and a load that perform "impedance matching". To match electrical impedances, engineers use combinations of
transformers,
resistors,
inductors,
capacitors and
transmission lines. These passive (and active) impedance-matching devices are optimized for different applications and include
baluns,
antenna tuners (sometimes called ATUs or roller-coasters, because of their appearance), acoustic horns, matching networks, and
terminators.
Transformers Transformers are sometimes used to match the impedances of circuits. A transformer converts
alternating current at one
voltage to the same waveform at another voltage. The power input to the transformer and output from the transformer is the same (except for conversion losses). The side with the lower voltage is at low impedance (because this has the lower number of turns), and the side with the higher voltage is at a higher impedance (as it has more turns in its coil). One example of this method involves a television
balun transformer. This transformer allows interfacing a balanced line (300-ohm
twin-lead) and an unbalanced line (75-ohm coaxial cable such as
RG-6). To match the impedances, both cables must be connected to a matching transformer with a turns ratio of 2:1. In this example, the 300-ohm line is connected to the transformer side with more turns; the 75-ohm cable is connected to the transformer side with fewer turns. The formula for calculating the transformer turns ratio for this example is: : \text{turns ratio} = \sqrt{\frac{\text{source resistance}}{\text{load resistance}}}
Resistive network Resistive impedance matches are easiest to design and can be achieved with a simple
L pad consisting of two resistors. Power loss is an unavoidable consequence of using resistive networks, and they are only (usually) used to transfer
line level signals.
Stepped transmission line Most
lumped-element devices can match a specific range of load impedances. For example, in order to match an inductive load into a real impedance, a capacitor needs to be used. If the load impedance becomes capacitive, the matching element must be replaced by an inductor. In many cases, there is a need to use the same circuit to match a broad range of load impedance and thus simplify the circuit design. This issue was addressed by the stepped transmission line, where multiple, serially placed, quarter-wave dielectric slugs are used to vary a transmission line's characteristic impedance. By controlling the position of each element, a broad range of load impedances can be matched without having to reconnect the circuit.
Filters Filters are frequently used to achieve impedance matching in telecommunications and radio engineering. In general, it is not theoretically possible to achieve perfect impedance matching at all
frequencies with a network of discrete components. Impedance matching networks are designed with a definite bandwidth, take the form of a filter, and use filter theory in their design. Applications requiring only a narrow bandwidth, such as radio tuners and transmitters, might use a simple tuned
filter such as a
stub. This would provide a perfect match at one specific frequency only. Wide bandwidth matching requires filters with multiple sections.
L-section (i.e. if network (a) can be used; otherwise network (b) can be used. A simple electrical impedance-matching network requires one capacitor and one inductor. In the figure to the right, R1 > R2, however, either R1 or R2 may be the source and the other the load. One of X1 or X2 must be an inductor and the other must be a capacitor. One reactance is in parallel with the source (or load), and the other is in series with the load (or source). If a reactance is in parallel
with the source, the effective network matches from high to low impedance. The analysis is as follows. Consider a real source impedance of R_1 and real load impedance of R_2. If a reactance X_1 is in parallel with the source impedance, the combined impedance can be written as: : \frac{j R_1 X_1}{R_1 + j X_1} If the imaginary part of the above impedance is canceled by the series reactance, the real part is : R_2 = \frac{R_1 X_1^2}{R_1^2 + X_1^2} Solving for X_1 : \left\vert X_1 \right\vert = \frac{R_1 }{Q} . : \left\vert X_2 \right\vert = Q R_2 . :where Q = \sqrt{\frac{R_1 - R_2}{ R_2 }} . Note, X_1, the reactance in parallel, has a negative reactance because it is typically a capacitor. This gives the L-network the additional feature of harmonic suppression since it is a low pass filter too. The inverse connection (impedance step-up) is simply the reverse—for example, reactance in series with the source. The magnitude of the impedance ratio is limited by reactance losses such as the
Q of the inductor. Multiple L-sections can be wired in cascade to achieve higher impedance ratios or greater bandwidth.
Transmission line matching networks can be modeled as infinitely many L-sections wired in cascade. Optimal matching circuits can be designed for a particular system using
Smith charts. ==Power factor correction==