s of a Reuleaux triangle The most basic property of the Reuleaux triangle is that it has constant width, meaning that for every pair of parallel
supporting lines (two lines of the same slope that both touch the shape without crossing through it) the two lines have the same
Euclidean distance from each other, regardless of the orientation of these lines. The first mathematician to discover the existence of curves of constant width, and to observe that the Reuleaux triangle has constant width, may have been
Leonhard Euler. In a paper that he presented in 1771 and published in 1781 entitled
De curvis triangularibus, Euler studied
curvilinear triangles as well as the curves of constant width, which he called orbiforms.
Extremal measures By many different measures, the Reuleaux triangle is one of the most extreme curves of constant width. By the
Blaschke–Lebesgue theorem, the Reuleaux triangle has the smallest possible area of any curve of given constant width. This area is :\frac{1}{2}(\pi - \sqrt3)s^2 \approx 0.705s^2, where
s is the constant width. One method for deriving this area formula is to partition the Reuleaux triangle into an inner equilateral triangle and three curvilinear regions between this inner triangle and the arcs forming the Reuleaux triangle, and then add the areas of these four sets. At the other extreme, the curve of constant width that has the maximum possible area is a
circular disk, which has area \pi s^2 / 4\approx 0.785s^2. The angles made by each pair of arcs at the corners of a Reuleaux triangle are all equal to 120°. This is the sharpest possible angle at any
vertex of any curve of constant width. The largest equilateral triangle inscribed in a Reuleaux triangle is the one connecting its three corners, and the smallest one is the one connecting the three
midpoints of its sides. The subset of the Reuleaux triangle consisting of points belonging to three or more diameters is the interior of the larger of these two triangles; it has a larger area than the set of three-diameter points of any other curve of constant width. Although the Reuleaux triangle has sixfold
dihedral symmetry, the same as an
equilateral triangle, it does not have
central symmetry. The Reuleaux triangle is the least symmetric curve of constant width according to two different measures of central asymmetry, the
Kovner–Besicovitch measure (ratio of area to the largest
centrally symmetric shape enclosed by the curve) and the
Estermann measure (ratio of area to the smallest centrally symmetric shape enclosing the curve). For the Reuleaux triangle, the two centrally symmetric shapes that determine the measures of asymmetry are both
hexagonal, although the inner one has curved sides. The Reuleaux triangle has diameters that split its area more unevenly than any other curve of constant width. That is, the maximum ratio of areas on either side of a diameter, another measure of asymmetry, is bigger for the Reuleaux triangle than for other curves of constant width. Among all shapes of constant width that avoid all points of an
integer lattice, the one with the largest width is a Reuleaux triangle. It has one of its axes of symmetry parallel to the coordinate axes on a half-integer line. Its width, approximately 1.54, is the root of a degree-6 polynomial with integer coefficients. Just as it is possible for a circle to be surrounded by six congruent circles that touch it, it is also possible to arrange seven congruent Reuleaux triangles so that they all make contact with a central Reuleaux triangle of the same size. This is the maximum number possible for any curve of constant width.
kite that maximizes the ratio of perimeter to diameter, inscribed in a Reuleaux triangle Among all
quadrilaterals, the shape that has the greatest ratio of its
perimeter to its
diameter is an
equidiagonal kite that can be inscribed into a Reuleaux triangle.
Other measures By
Barbier's theorem all curves of the same constant width including the Reuleaux triangle have equal
perimeters. In particular this perimeter equals the perimeter of the circle with the same width, which is \pi s. The radii of the largest
inscribed circle of a Reuleaux triangle with width
s, and of the
circumscribed circle of the same triangle, are :\displaystyle\left(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt 3}\right)s\approx 0.423s \quad \text{and} \quad \displaystyle\frac{s}{\sqrt 3}\approx 0.577s respectively; the sum of these radii equals the width of the Reuleaux triangle. More generally, for every curve of constant width, the largest inscribed circle and the smallest circumscribed circle are concentric, and their radii sum to the constant width of the curve. The optimal
packing density of the Reuleaux triangle in the plane remains unproven, but is conjectured to be :\frac{2(\pi-\sqrt 3)}{\sqrt{15}+\sqrt{7}-\sqrt{12}} \approx 0.923, which is the density of one possible
double lattice packing for these shapes. The best proven upper bound on the packing density is approximately 0.947. It has also been conjectured, but not proven, that the Reuleaux triangles have the highest packing density of any curve of constant width.
Rotation within a square Any curve of constant width can form a rotor within a
square, a shape that can perform a complete rotation while staying within the square and at all times touching all four sides of the square. However, the Reuleaux triangle is the rotor with the minimum possible area. Because of its 120° angles, the rotating Reuleaux triangle cannot reach some points near the sharper angles at the square's vertices, but rather covers a shape with slightly rounded corners, also formed by elliptical arcs.
As a counterexample Reuleaux's original motivation for studying the Reuleaux triangle was as a counterexample, showing that three single-point contacts may not be enough to fix a planar object into a single position. The existence of Reuleaux triangles and other curves of constant width shows that diameter measurements alone cannot verify that an object has a circular cross-section. In connection with the
inscribed square problem, observed that the Reuleaux triangle provides an example of a constant-width shape in which no regular polygon with more than four sides can be inscribed, except the regular hexagon, and he described a small modification to this shape that preserves its constant width but also prevents regular hexagons from being inscribed in it. He generalized this result to three dimensions using a cylinder with the same shape as its
cross section. == Applications ==