Support On the same day that then-President Trump signed the Act into law, former National Security Advisor
John Bolton claimed that Trump had, on two occasions, told
Chinese leader Xi Jinping to go forward with plans related to Uyghur internment. Editorials in
The New York Times and
The Washington Post supported the passage of the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act. Opinion pieces written in various publications also supported the passage of the Act. The CCP claim of deradicalization drew criticism in an article by the
Deccan Chronicle, while an article written by
Srikanth Kondapalli made criticisms of the PRC's grand strategy for Xinjiang. Analysts cited in an article by
Reuters said that mainland China's response to passage of the Uyghur bill could be stronger than its reaction to the
Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act,
Uyghur community On December 3, 2019, a
World Uyghur Congress spokesman said that the House bill is important in opposing "China's continued push of extreme persecution," and that the organization looks forward to Trump signing the bill.
Nury Turkel, former President of the
Uyghur American Association, thanked Trump for signing the Act and urged Congress to pass a second Uyghur-related bill, the
Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act which passed in 2021.
Opposition The Chinese government have called the bill a malicious attack on China and demanded that the United States prevent it from becoming law, warning that it would act to defend its interests as necessary. State media commentator and then-editor-in-chief of the CCP-owned tabloid
Global Times,
Hu Xilin, incorporated the bill's passage into his
nationalist rhetoric and criticized it as another example of an anti-China legislation. In December 2019, the
Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates defended China's actions in Xinjiang and condemned the bill as a "blatant interference by the US in the internal affairs of the People's Republic of China." ==See also==