After his ascension to the caliphate, Mu'awiya authorized the cursing of Ali as part of the communal prayers in the Islamic territories. Among others, this is reported by the
Shia-leaning historians
al-Ya'qubi () and
al-Mas'udi () and the
Sunni historians
al-Tabari () and
Abulfeda (). In particular, Mu'awiya ordered his governor of Kufa,
Al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba, to regularly curse Ali and harass his followers, while praising Uthman and empowering his followers, as reported by al-Tabari. A tradition attributed to al-Mughira's son describes how the governor failed to convince Mu'awiya to abandon this policy and leave behind a legacy of reconciliation. Mu'awiya refused, saying that there would be no lasting fame after Muhammad, referring to the Prophet by his nickname of Ibn Abi Kabsha among the
Meccan infidels. The governor then confessed to his son that he henceforth considered Mu'awiya as such an infidel, as reported by the Sunni historian
al-Zubayr ibn Bakkar (). While probably not authentic, the account may nevertheless reflect the attitude towards Mu'awiya among early Sunni historians. The cursing of Ali was continued by Umayyad rulers after Mu'awiya for sixty years, including on the
Day of Arafa during the annual
Hajj pilgrimage. The curse was also apparently extended to Ali's sons
Hasan and
Husayn, who were the grandsons of Muhammad. The practice came to an end under the Umayyad caliph
Umar II (), often known for his piety, who reportedly replaced the curse with verses 59:15 and 16:90 from the Quran. Caliph
Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik () followed suit and did not curse Ali on Arafa, apparently ignoring protests by Abd-Allah ibn al-Walid, the grandson of Uthman. The practice is viewed by Shias to have been widespread, while its existence is disputed among Sunni scholars, with one notable scholar affirming it being
Abul A'la Maududi (), the founder of the Islamic movement
Jamaat-e-Islami. Maududi believed that not even
al-Masjid al-Nabawi in Medina was exempted from this policy, where Ali and his relatives were cursed next to Muhammad's grave and in the presence of the descendants of Ali. The historian
Husain M. Jafri () considers this practice a propaganda measure, while the Islamicist
Wilferd Madelung suggests that the rule of Mu'awiya was largely legitimized by his revenge for the assassination of Uthman, for which Mu'awiya publicly charged Ali with complicity after the latter dismissed the former as the governor of Syria. In a tradition cited by the Sunni historians
al-Baladhuri () and
Ibn Asakir (), the Umayyad
Marwan ibn al-Hakam explains to the apolitical
Ali al-Sajjad that his grandfather Ali ibn Abi Talib was the most temperate () among early Muslims to Uthman. Marwan then added that Ali was nevertheless cursed because the Umayyad rule would not be sound otherwise. The practice was also perhaps intended to provoke, identify, and then crush the supporters of Ali, who were considered a threat to Umayyad rule. Among its first victims was
Hujr ibn Adi. Indeed, Ali considered it excusable for his supporters to curse him (under duress) but apparently had not allowed them to dissociate () themselves from him, according to the Islamicist
Maria M. Dakake.
Hujr ibn Adi Hujr was a companion of Muhammad and an ardent supporter of Ali. Respected for his piety, Hujr was a distinguished elder of his tribe, the
Kinda, though not its leader. After the accession of Mu'awiya, he regularly protested the cursing of Ali in the mosque of Kufa and led agitation against Umayyad rule, which was tolerated by al-Mughira, the erstwhile governor of Kufa, but not by his successor
Ziyad ibn Abihi, who was appointed in 671 to rule Iraq and the Eastern provinces. Ziyad arrested Hujr after he raised opposition to Mu'awiya's confiscation of the Kufan garrison's crown lands and sent him to Mu'awiya, who put Hujr on trial for high treason and then executed him and his loyalists. Before being executed, Hujr and his partisans were given the opportunity to save their lives by cursing Ali, which they refused. This was probably the first judicial execution of Muslims for high treason and was widely condemned at the time, including by
Aisha bint Abi Bakr, who was otherwise
hostile to Ali. The execution of Hujr was later called a pernicious crime by the Sunni theologian
Hasan al-Basri (). Nevertheless, early historians are at odds about Hujr. The early Sunni traditionist Hisham is hostile to Hujr while the Shia-leaning historians
Abu Mikhnaf () and al-Mas'udi are sympathetic to him. Among modern authors, the execution is condemned by Madelung, while Wellhausen sides with Mu'awiya and Ziyad.
Other cases Under the Umayyads, some Shias were compelled to curse Ali to save their lives. One instance is the Shia hadith traditionalist
Atiyah ibn Sa'd (), who escaped to
Fars when the revolt led by
Ibn al-Ash'ath and his Iraqi followers against Umayyad rule was crushed in 701 by
Al-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, the Umayyad governor of Iraq and the East. On al-Hajjaj's orders, Atiyah was subsequently captured and demanded to curse Ali by the Umayyad commander and governor of Fars,
Muhammad ibn al-Qasim. He refused and was beaten but survived and fled to Khorasan. ==References==