Legal dispute with Eichstädt Even before
Isis was published, the classical philologist
Abraham Eichstädt from Jena learned of the planned new journal. Eichstädt, who published the
Jenaische allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung, had held an exclusive right to publish
reviews in Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach since 1803. As he feared for the financial security of his paper, Eichstädt turned to the President of the State Ministry in Weimar,
Christian Gottlob Voigt, and obtained a renewal of this privilege on July 17, 1816. Oken saw this as a violation of the freedom of the press guaranteed in the Weimar Constitution of May 15, 1816 and sneered in the second issue of
Isis: "Whether we really have
freedom of the press, or whether it is to be mocked as a grimace through literary privileges and arbitrary interpretation and extension of the same, will be taught by the progress of
Isis." Eichstädt filed a lawsuit against Oken and
Isis on August 1, 1816. In a judgment dated August 23, Oken was ordered to refrain from publishing reviews and political articles. In the event of non-compliance, he was threatened with a fine of 50 thalers and a ban on
Isis. Oken, who became aware of the verdict eight days later, protested against it to the Weimar government on September 2 and attached the first five issues of Isis to his letter in support of his position. In the course of September 1816, the verdict against Oken and
Isis was finally withdrawn. Looking ahead,
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe commented on the events in his diary on July 30, 1816, with the remark: "
Isis as Hydra."
Goethe's recommendation for a ban In order not to exacerbate the disputes with Eichstädt, Oken had filled the first four issues exclusively with scientific topics and suggested to Brockhaus that he initially refrain from including controversial political articles, as political newspapers in the Duchy of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach were still subject to censorship. However, Brockhaus did not agree to this and delayed the delivery of the first four issues. As the dispute with Eichstädt progressed, Oken finally felt compelled to include political topics in Isis. In the sixth issue of Isis, he placed a prize issue in which he questioned the legitimacy of literary privileges. In the ninth issue and the two following issues, Oken criticized the Basic Law on the
Landständische Verfassung des Großherzogthums Sachsen-Weimar-Eisenach, which came into force on 5 May 1816. In the third issue of Isis, Oken also printed a letter dated December 5, 1811, from the Rostock professors
Samuel Gottlieb Vogel,
Wilhelm Josephi,
Georg Heinrich Masius (1771–1823) and
Karl Ernst Theodor Brandenburg (1772–1827), in which they rejected Oken's appointment to the vacant chair of natural history at the
University of Rostock due to his pompous natural philosophy. Oken illustrated the print with a vignette depicting donkey heads. On September 10, 1816, Christian Gottlob von Voigt drew up an
indictment in response to these
Isis editions. Oken was accused of insulting the highest royal dignity of the sovereign, insulting official dignity, attacking some German governments and their rulers, as well as insulting foreign official authorities and the Rostock professors. A week later,
Grand Duke Karl August sent the indictment to the State Directorate for examination. The expert opinions written by
Anton Ziegesar (1783–1843), the head of the administrative and police authority
Karl Wilhelm von Fritsch, and the head of the school and church system Ernst Christian August von Gersdorff were collected together with the first eleven issues of Isis in a file entitled A
cta Geheimer Staats-Canzley Den Unfug der Preßfrechheit besonders der Isis betr. 1816. Grand Duke Carl August sent this file to Goethe at the end of September and asked him for his judgment. As can be seen from his diary notes, Goethe needed several days to consider the matter of Isis. In his reply of 5 October, Goethe recommended to the Grand Duke not to prosecute Oken personally, but to take action against the printer of Isis and thus enforce a ban on printing the journal. Carl August did not follow Goethe's advice, but instead discontinued the prosecution.
The Wartburgfest and the confiscated number 195 of Isis Before the end of 1816, Isis was banned in Austria. Meanwhile, Oken continued to campaign for freedom of the press and, for example, published a report on the meeting of the Dutch estates under the title "Against the Restriction of Freedom of the Press". In June 1817, the Prussian Minister of Police,
Wilhelm Ludwig Georg Fürst zu Wittgenstein, complained to Carl August about a derogatory criticism of a Prussian decree of 1811 that had appeared in the
Oppositions-Blatt and a small note in
Isis, in which Oken complained about Prussia's presumption in wanting to interfere even in insignificant matters such as those of the Vienna Agricultural Society. Six days later, a serious warning was issued to the editor of the opposition journal
Friedrich Justin Bertuch and Oken, stating "that in the event of further disregard of the sovereign's or authorities' orders, the suppression of this journal will be pursued". During the
Wartburg Festival, which Oken and other professors from Jena attended, an
auto-da-fé took place on the evening of October 18, 1817, during which parts of a Prussian
Uhlan uniform, a
Hessian soldier's braid and an Austrian corporal's baton, as well as several books by authors considered
reactionary, including
Karl Albert von Kamptz,
Theodor Schmalz,
Karl Ludwig von Haller and
August von Kotzebue, were burned. Fourteen days later, Oken published a report on the meeting at Wartburg Castle, which also contained a list of the burned books and objects, along with mocking signs. Kamptz, the head of the Ministry of Police in Berlin, whose ''Codex der Gensd'armerie'' was one of the burned books, railed in a letter dated November 9, 1817 to Grand Duke Carl August about the "bunch of feral professors and seduced students" and went on to write: "If true freedom of thought and freedom of the press really flourishes in Your Royal Highness's states, then censorship practiced by fire and pitchforks, by enthusiasts and minors, and terrorist proceedings against freedom of thought and freedom of the press in other states are certainly not compatible with this." The following day, a report by Weimar State Minister
Karl Wilhelm von Fritsch exonerated Oken and the other professors, stating that they had not taken part in the burning. Nevertheless, on November 27, 1817, number 195 was confiscated and a temporary ban on the printing of Isis was issued, which was lifted on December 15. From December 2 onwards, a commission consisting of members of the Weimar state government investigated the Isis incidents. Oken was interrogated several times in Weimar. The commission submitted its report to the state government on December 20. The government was willing to return the confiscated copies of Isis if the disputed passages were removed. Oken did not agree to this deal. On January 24, 1818, Oken was sentenced to six weeks in prison for "offenses against the highest dignity of the sovereign, offenses against the official dignity of the upper state authorities and the academic senate in Jena, denigration of German rulers and governments and insulting foreign official authorities". Together with his statement published by the
Bremer Zeitung at the end of March 1818, Oken had the sentence printed in full in Isis. Oken appealed against the sentence to the Jena High Court of Appeal and was acquitted on April 29, 1818.
The August von Kotzebue incident Through an indiscretion, the history professor
Heinrich Luden from Jena came into possession of one of the numerous bulletins written by the Russian consul general
Kotzebue and intended for
Tsar Alexander I in mid-December 1817. He wrote a biting commentary on it for the journal
Nemesis, although Kotzebue was able to prevent its publication and dissemination by court order on January 15, 1818. Oken nevertheless published Luden's article in the first issue of
Isis in 1818. After the issue was published, the remaining copies were confiscated.
Isis was banned again on January 31, 1818, and was not published again until the end of April. Both Luden and Oken were sentenced to three months imprisonment and a fine of 60 thalers by the
Königlich Sächsischen Schöppengericht in Leipzig. Oken chose the fine and again published the files relating to the trial in
Isis. On March 23, 1819, Kotzebue was murdered in
Mannheim by the Jena fraternity member and theology student
Karl Ludwig Sand. (1819)
Oken's dismissal The attacks against Oken's
Isis from the states of the
Holy Alliance continued relentlessly. On January 29, 1819,
Karl August von Hardenberg submitted a complaint to Grand Duke
Karl August because of a derisive remark about the Prussian King
Friedrich Wilhelm III, which was printed in the twelfth issue of 1818, but this time without consequences for Oken and
Isis. At the Aachen Congress in the fall of 1818, the Russian Tsar Alexander I distributed an anonymously written memorandum by
Alexander Scarlatovich Sturdsa (1791–1854) entitled ''Memoire sur l'état actuel de l'Allemagne'', in which Sturdsa commented on the dangerous activities at German universities. Oken's replies again caused a sensation. Under pressure from the Russian envoy to the Saxon court,
Vasily Vasilyevich Chanykov (1759–1829), the Weimar state treasurer
Carl August Constantin Schnauss (1782–1832) was forced to file charges against Oken on April 20, 1819. On May 11, Grand Duke
Carl August of Weimar and Duke
August of Gotha instructed the
Senate of the University of Jena to give Oken the choice of either discontinuing
Isis or resigning his professorship. The Senate tried to give in, but had to present Oken with this choice eleven days later. After three days of deliberation, Oken responded evasively: "I have no answer to the request made to me. Perhaps they have come to a different conclusion that an answer is unnecessary." In its reply to the dukes, the Senate once again referred to Oken's outstanding reputation as a teacher and researcher, but to no avail. On June 1, 1819, Duke
Carl Friedrich ordered Oken's dismissal and the withholding of his salary from June 15 onwards in the name and on behalf of his father. A similar order from the Duchy of
Saxe-Gotha-Altenburg followed six days later. On June 26, 1818, the printing of
Isis was provisionally banned. To avoid the ban, Oken moved the printing of
Isis to nearby
Rudolstadt in the Principality of
Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt. There,
Carl Popo Fröbel (1786–1824), stepbrother of the educator
Friedrich Fröbel and owner of the court printing works since 1815, took over the printing of
Isis from August 1819. After Fröbel's death in 1824, the print shop was initially taken over by Fröbel's widow and finally continued by his son Günther Fröbel from 1832, who produced the last issues of
Isis in 1850. A small part of
Isis was produced in
Eisenberg until 1824/25. After the
Carlsbad Decrees of September 1819, it became increasingly difficult to deal with political issues. Their share of articles in
Isis fell sharply. After Brockhaus' death, Oken announced in the first issue of 1824 that
Isis would no longer print political articles. == Content ==