Opponents of discrimination against men, have criticised military
conscription, or compulsory military service, as
sexist. At the same time, the existing gender equality indices do not take into account gender-based mandatory conscription in peacetime for men. Military registration only for men in the United States is one of the examples that men's rights activist
Warren Farrell cites to argue that discrimination against men is pervasive. He writes that if any other group (for example, Jews, African Americans or women) were chosen at birth to become the only group for which registration for potential death would be required, society would call it anti-Semitism, racism or sexism. according to Farrell, men absorb society's ideas about military duty as a path to glory and power, and as a result do not consider it as discrimination.
Selective service In 1981, the U.S. Supreme Court in the
Rostker v. Goldberg case recognised the constitutional practice of military registration of only the male part of the country's population, arguing that women could not serve in positions related to direct participation in hostilities. However, in 2015, the Pentagon lifted all restrictions on military service for women. In this regard, National Coalition For Men filed a lawsuit on the unconstitutionality of military registration aimed only at men, considering this practise discriminatory: men who do not register in
Selective Service System at the age of 18 may be denied state benefits, such as employment in federal organisations and student loans. As a result, on 22 February 2019, a federal court in Texas agreed with human rights defenders, recognizing the current system of military registration in the United States unconstitutional. However, in August 2020, this decision was overturned by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. In June 2021, the US Supreme Court refused to review the decision of the Court of Appeals.
In the former Soviet Union In Soviet society, universal male military duty played a significant role in the construction of masculinity: Soviet ideas about militarized
masculinity were based on the ideas of civic duty, heroism and patriotism, and Soviet gender ideology defined military service as the most important instance of turning a boy into a man. In post-Soviet Russia, the link between masculinity and militarization, established by the institute of
conscription, has undergone significant changes — largely for political and economic reasons. Unlike the Soviet one, the post-Soviet Russian state no longer provides men with the former social guarantees as a reward for militarization, and the state's rupture of the former social contract leads to the reluctance of young men to go to military service. In addition, with the collapse of the Soviet state, militarized masculinity came into conflict with the new capitalist masculinity: many young men believe that military service is incompatible with a dynamic market economy and competition in the labour market. Scientists also state a significant gap between the state ideology of militarized patriotism and the sentiments of the Russian population, a significant part of which is sceptical about post-Soviet military conflicts and does not regard them as fair. During the
Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the Ukrainian authorities, in order to mobilize men, banned men aged 18 to 60 from leaving the country before the end of hostilities, which is discrimination against men on the basis of gender and violation of human rights.
Partial mobilization in Russia is no less discriminatory for men, since it forces them to risk their lives and health and kill other people regardless of their views; at the same time, men who fled mobilization in Russia are not even recognised by other countries as refugees. == Other ==