The tree model requires languages to evolve exclusively through social splitting and linguistic divergence. In the “tree” scenario, the adoption of certain innovations by a group of dialects should result immediately in their loss of contact with other related dialects: this is the only way to explain the nested organisation of subgroups imposed by the tree structure. Such a requirement is absent from the wave model, which can easily accommodate a distribution of innovations in intersected patterns. Such a configuration is typical of
dialect continua (and of
linkages, see below), that is, historical situations in which dialects share innovations with different neighbours simultaneously, in such a way that the genealogical subgroups they define form an intersected pattern. This explains the popularity of the wave model in studies of
dialectology.
Johannes Schmidt used a second metaphor to explain the formation of a language from a continuum. The continuum is at first like a smooth, sloping line. Speakers in close proximity tend to unify their speech, creating a stepped line out of the sloped line. These steps are the dialects. Over the course of time, some steps become weak and
fall into disuse, while others preempt the entire continuum. As an example, Schmidt used
Standard German, which was defined to conform to some dialects and then spread throughout Germany, replacing the local dialects in many cases. ==Legacy==