Recognition Since she began writing in the 1960s, Doniger has gained the reputation of being "one of America's major scholars in the humanities". Assessing Doniger's body of work, K. M. Shrimali, Professor of Ancient Indian History at the
University of Delhi, writes: ... it (1973) also happened to be the year when her first major work in early India's religious history, viz.,
Siva, the Erotic Ascetic was published and had instantly become a talking point for being a path-breaking work. I still prescribe it as the most essential reading to my postgraduate students at the University of Delhi, where I have been teaching a compulsory course on 'Evolution of Indian Religions' for the last nearly four decades. It was the beginning of series of extremely fruitful and provocative encounters with the formidable scholarship of Wendy Doniger. Doniger is a scholar of
Sanskrit and Indian textual traditions. By her self-description, I myself am by both temperament and training inclined to texts. I am neither an archaeologist nor an art historian; I am a Sanskritist, indeed a recovering Orientalist, of a generation that framed its study of Sanskrit with Latin and Greek rather than Urdu or Tamil. I've never dug anything up out of the ground or established the date of a sculpture. I've labored all my adult life in the paddy fields of Sanskrit, ... Her books both in
Hinduism and other fields have been positively reviewed by the Indian scholar
Vijaya Nagarajan and the American Hindu scholar
Lindsey B. Harlan, who noted as part of a positive review that "Doniger's agenda is her desire to rescue the comparative project from the jaws of certain proponents of
postmodernism". Of her
Hindu Myths: A Sourcebook Translated from the Sanskrit, the
Indologist Richard Gombrich wrote: "Intellectually, it is a triumph..." Doniger's (then O'Flaherty) 1973 book
Asceticism and Eroticism in the Mythology of Śiva was a critique of the "Great tradition
Śivapurāṇas and the tension that arises between Śiva's ascetic and erotic activities." Richard Gombrich called it "learned and exciting"; Doniger's
Rigveda, a translation of 108 hymns selected from the canon, was deemed among the most reliable by
historian of religion Ioan P. Culianu. However, in an email message,
Michael Witzel called it "idiosyncratic and unreliable just like her Jaiminiya Brahmana or Manu (re-)translations."
Criticism Beginning in the early 2000s, some conservative diaspora Hindus started to question whether Doniger accurately described
Hindu traditions. Together with some of her colleagues, she was the subject of a critique by Hindu right-wing activist speaker
Rajiv Malhotra, for using
psychoanalytic concepts to interpret non-Western subjects.
Aditi Banerjee, a co-author of Malhotra, criticised Wendy Doniger as grossly misquoting the text of
Valmiki Ramayana. Rajiv Malhotra criticizes Doniger in his articles ‘RISA Lila–1: Wendy's Child Syndrome’ and ‘RISA Lila–2: Limp Scholarship and Demonology’ where her and her students have misrepresented Hindu traditions and texts.
Christian Lee Novetzke, associate professor of
South Asian Studies at the
University of Washington, summarizes this controversy as follows: Novetzke cites Doniger's use of "psychoanalytical theory" as Philosopher
Martha Nussbaum, concurring with Novetzke, adds that while the agenda of those in the
American Hindu community who criticize Doniger appears similar to that of the
Hindu right-wing in India, it is not quite the same since it has "no overt connection to national identity", and that it has created feelings of guilt among American scholars, given the prevailing ethos of ethnic respect, that they might have offended people from another culture. While Doniger has agreed that Indians have ample grounds to reject
postcolonial domination, she claims that her works are only a single perspective which does not subordinate Indian self-identity. Her authorship of the section describing Hindu Religion in
Microsoft's Encarta Encyclopedia was criticized for being politically motivated and distorted. Following a review, the article was withdrawn. Patak Kumar notes that Doniger has given a "dispassionate secular critique" of Hinduism, which is met with defensive responses by Indian scholars such as
Varadaraja V. Raman, who acknowledged the "sound scholarship" of Doniger, but urged "appreciation and sensitivity" when "analyzing works regarded as sacred by vast numbers of people."
The Hindus Doniger's trade book,
The Hindus: An Alternative History was published in 2009 by Viking/Penguin. According to the
Hindustan Times,
The Hindus was a No. 1
bestseller in its non-fiction category in the week of October 15, 2009. Two scholarly reviews in the
Social Scientist and the
Journal of the American Oriental Society, though praising Doniger for her textual scholarship, criticized both Doniger's poor historiography and her lack of focus. In the popular press, the book has received many positive reviews, for example from the
Library Journal, the
Times Literary Supplement, the
New York Review of Books,
The New York Times, and
The Hindu. In January 2010, the
National Book Critics Circle named
The Hindus as a finalist for its 2009 book awards. The
Hindu American Foundation protested this decision, alleging inaccuracies and bias in the book. In 2011, a lawsuit was filed against Doniger and Penguin books by
Dinanath Batra on the grounds that the book intentionally offended or outraged the religious sentiments of Hindus, an action punishable by criminal prosecution under
Section 295A of the Indian Penal Code. In 2014, as part of a settlement agreement reached with plaintiff,
The Hindus was recalled by
Penguin India. Indian authors such as
Arundhati Roy,
Partha Chatterjee,
Jeet Thayil, and Namwar Singh inveighed against the publisher's decision. The book has since been published in India by Speaking Tiger Books. ==Recognition==