Treatment of special needs students In 2007, the state of Connecticut enacted legislation preventing physical restraint or seclusion of special needs students, except in limited situations, largely as a result of allegations of mistreatment of four special education students in Wilton High School and other Wilton schools in 2005. Jill Ely claimed that, without notifying her, the school forced her intellectually disabled son into a room at the high school that was held shut until he became completely quiet. Maryanne Lombardi made similar claims that her 9-year old autistic son, who did not speak, was routinely sent to a "padded cell called the timeout room" at another Wilton school. The play,
Voices in Conflict, had been written and produced by students under the direction of Bonnie Dickinson, a Theatre teacher with 13 years' experience. It was supposed to have been performed in school during the day. School officials, including Superintendent Gary Richards, notwithstanding national attention over the cancellation and a letter protesting signed by
Stephen Sondheim,
Edward Albee,
Christopher Durang,
John Guare and
John Patrick Shanley, refused to allow the production to be performed at the school. Theater groups rallied to the students' defense and the play was subsequently performed at the
Fairfield Theatre Company, The
Vineyard Theatre, The
Culture Project and
The Public Theater. The play was produced for
Connecticut Public Television and Dickinson became the official 2007 Honoree of the
National Coalition Against Censorship and the winner of the Connecticut Center for First Amendment Rights' 2007 "Freedom Award."
Cell phone ban For the 2024-25 school year, Wilton Public Schools introduced a cell phone ban throughout the entire school day from 8:20 AM to 2:55 PM after
US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy issued an advisory warning on the effect of social media on young people and in line with many other school districts across the United States. In addition,
Yondr pouches were to be distributed to all students to store their phones, expecting the pouches to remove the need for teachers to police phones. Superintendent Kevin J. Smith advertised the ban as made to remove distractions in classrooms, promote face-to-face interaction between students, improve mental health, and decrease cyberbullying and other disruptive online behavior. Opposing parents criticized the ban on its merits, citing concerns related to reasonable use of phones during the day, the schools apparent lack of trust in students, and the potential need for students to have access to cell phones during emergencies. The two Board of Education members found fault in its adoption procedurally, with member Heather Priest citing concerns over funding the distribution of the Yondr pouches. She criticized Smith's plan to pay for the pouches with $80,000 of "unexpended funds" from the 2023-2024 fiscal budget as a potential misappropriation of both budget funds and discretionary administrative power, as the Board of Education had taken budget cuts for the 2024-2025 fiscal year and had not voted on the expenditure prior to its completion. Member Nicola Davies suggested an alternative pilot program in Wilton's middle school. Smith continued to support the new policy citing a survey of WHS teaching staff, a majority of whom had criticized the previous cell phone policy as ineffective. The survey also demonstrated a majority sentiment among teachers that cell phones were causing "a decrease in academic performance". Though the survey demonstrated more evenly split results among parents and highly opposite results from students, the ban retained strong support from WHS administrators and staff, and was approved unanimously by the Board of Education in a 6-0 vote on October 10, 2024, despite continued dissatisfaction from two members. Lila Hidalgo, a writer in the school's newspaper
The Forum, noted that while banning cell phones throughout the entire school day would be an easy way to stop phone use, a total ban would not be the complete solution. Students in favor of the phone ban believe the ban would reduce dependency on phones, while some students who opposed the ban believed the ban was made as a punishment to students by limiting access to devices during breaks in the school day. Student opposition to the ban was mostly concerned with the "unrealistic" standards made by the school, not the belief that cell phone use disrupts learning. Hidalgo argued that because WHS expects students to act responsibly in high school, students should have the right to use their phones between classes, during breaks and at lunch. WHS administration disagreed with this, citing the need for student face-to-face interaction. The counter-argument has also been criticized by students as an attempt to control students' relationships. Student Sophia Gordon, commenting on the ban's goal on increasing social interaction, said "You can't force people to be friends. It has to be natural. In the real world, you don't need to like everybody." ==Sports==