The family Zosteropidae was introduced (as a subfamily Zosteropinae) in 1853 by the French naturalist
Charles Lucien Bonaparte. The white-eyes were long considered a distinct
family Zosteropidae because they are rather homogeneous in
morphology and
ecology, leading to little
adaptive radiation and
divergence. The genus
Apalopteron, formerly placed in the
Meliphagidae, was transferred to the white eyes in 1995 on genetic and behavioral evidence. It differs much in appearance from the typical white-eyes,
Zosterops, but is approached by some
Micronesian
taxa; its color pattern is fairly unusual save the imperfect white eye-ring. In 2003, Alice Cibois published the results of her study of
mtDNA cytochrome b and
12S/
16S rRNA sequence data. According to her results, the white-eyes were likely to form a
clade also containing the
yuhinas, which were until then placed with the
Old World babblers, a large "
wastebin" family. Previous molecular studies (e.g. Sibley & Ahlquist 1990, Barker
et al. 2002) had together with the morphological evidence tentatively placed white-eyes as the Timaliidae's closest relatives already. But some questions remained, mainly because the white-eyes are all very similar birds in habitus and habits, while the Old World babblers are very diverse (because, as we now know, the group as formerly defined was
polyphyletic). Combined with the yuhinas (and possibly other Timaliidae), the limits of the white-eye clade to the "true" Old World babblers becomes indistinct. Therefore, the current (early 2007) opinion weighs towards merging the group into the Timaliidae, perhaps as a
subfamily ("Zosteropinae"). Few white-eyes have been thoroughly studied with the new results in mind, however, and almost all of these are from
Zosterops which even at this point appears
over-lumped. Also, many "Old World babblers" remain in unresolved relationships. Whether there can be a clear delimitation of a white-eye subfamily or even a young or emerging family is a question that requires a more comprehensive study of both this group and Timaliidae to resolve (Jønsson & Fjeldså 2006). For example, a revision of the yuhinas and the genus
Stachyris (Cibois
et al. 2002), based on the same genes as Cibois (2003), revealed that the Philippine species placed in the latter genus by some were actually yuhinas. However, when the review by Jønsson & Fjeldså (2006) was published, no study had tried to propose a phylogeny for the newly defined yuhinas including the white eyes. Therefore, Jønsson & Fjeldså (2006) give a rather misleading phylogeny for the group. It appears as if the yuhinas are polyphyletic, with the
white-collared yuhina being closer to the ancestor of the
Zosterops white-eyes than to other yuhinas including the species moved from
Stachyris (Cibois
et al. 2002). In the past, the
Madanga (
Madanga ruficollis) was included in this family but studies now place it as an atypical member of the
Motacillidae. The cladogram below showing the relationships between families is based on a study of babblers by Tianlong Cai and collaborators published in 2019. }} The cladogram below showing the relationships between the genera is based on the study by Carl Oliveros and collaborators that was published in 2021. The genera
Apalopteron,
Tephrozosterops and
Rukia were not sampled in this study. The genus
Megazosterops was found to be nested in
Heleia. The earlier study by Cai and collaborators found a generally similar phylogeny but with
Cleptornis as
sister to
Heleia. Cai's study found that
Apalopteron was nested within
Heleia with weak support and that
Tephrozosterops was sister to
Zosterops. }} ==List of genera==