Since the week prior to the shutdown of RCTV, many individuals, international organizations and
NGOs—including the
OAS's
Secretary General José Miguel Insulza and its
Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, the
Inter American Press Association,
Human Rights Watch, and the
Committee to Protect Journalists,—have expressed concerns for freedom of the press following the shutdown. However, Secretary Insulza also stated that it was up to the Venezuelan courts to solve this dispute and that he believed that this was an administrative decision. The
International Press Institute stated that it is "a flagrant attempt to silence the station's critical voice and in violation of everyone's right 'to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers,' as outlined in Article 19 of the UN
Universal Declaration of Human Rights" The
Committee to Protect Journalists "concluded [Chávez's] government failed to conduct a fair and transparent review of RCTV's concession renewal. The report, based on a three-month investigation, found the government’s decision was a predetermined and politically motivated effort to silence critical coverage."
Reporters Without Borders stated "The closure of RCTV [...] is a serious violation of freedom of expression and a major setback to democracy and pluralism. President Chávez has silenced Venezuela’s most popular TV station and the only national station to criticize him, and he has violated all legal norms by seizing RCTV’s broadcast equipment for the new public TV station that is replacing it."
Freedom House has given Venezuela a press freedom rating of "Not Free" since 2002, most recently describing a number of new laws, most particularly the 2004
Ley Resorte, that include prohibitions against broadcasting violent material between 5 a.m. and 11 p.m., targeting a group or individual for hatred, and insulting president Chávez, under penalty of severe fines and imprisonment. The
Senate of the
United States approved a motion promoted by Senators
Richard Lugar and
Christopher Dodd condemning the closing, stating that the move was a "transgression of freedom of thought and expression" in Venezuela, while
Nancy Pelosi,
Speaker of the
U.S. House of Representatives, asserted that it was an attempt to silence the critics of the Government. The
U.S. State Department, the
European Union, the senates of
Chile and
Brazil, and the legislatures of a number of other Latin American countries have also expressed concern over the incident.
European Commission President
José Manuel Durão Barroso qualified the measure as regrettable, adding that "freedom of expression and press freedom are substantial components of democracy." Costa Rican President
Óscar Arias Sánchez stated that any media closing was a deathly strike against any democratic system. Chilean President
Michelle Bachelet said she regrets the decision and that "freedom of expression is the golden rule." The Spanish
Partido Popular, the main opposition party, called the closing an "attack against freedom of expression". After the
Brazilian Senate passed a motion urging Chávez to reconsider the revocation of RCTV's license, Chávez "accused the Brazilian Congress of acting like a 'puppet' of the US", prompting Brazilian
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to say "Chavez has to take care of Venezuela, I have to take care of Brazil and
Bush has to take care of the US". Later, Lula da Silva said the decision of not renewing the broadcast license was internal Venezuelan business, adding that the legal logic of each country should be respected. Chávez said that presidents
Daniel Ortega of
Nicaragua and
Evo Morales of
Bolivia phoned to show support to his decision. President
Álvaro Uribe from
Colombia said that the country would not involve itself in Venezuela's internal affairs. President
Rafael Correa of
Ecuador said that he would have canceled the broadcast license automatically (after the 2002 coup). Responding to
Nancy Pelosi, Bernardo Álvarez, the country's ambassador to the United States, described the licensing decision as a simple regulatory matter, which "was not made based on RCTV’s critical editorial stance against the government, nor was it directed at silencing criticism of the government." Álvarez argued that Venezuela wished to adopt a more European model of public broadcasting, he wrote that 79 of 81 Venezuelan television stations, 706 of 709 radio broadcasters, and 118 newspapers remain in private hands, citing a 30 May 2007 op-ed published in the
Los Angeles Times: "Radio, TV and newspapers remain uncensored, unfettered and unthreatened by the government. Most Venezuelan media are still staunchly anti-Chávez." In
Nicaragua, followers of Hugo Chávez voiced their support of his closing of RCTV on 27 May in Managua. This small rally was met with negative reactions from local press, who condemned the involvement of the Venezuelan Ambassador
Miguel Gómez. ==See also==