is the primary verse of the Quran to refer to the event of Jesus' crucifixion. It says that Jesus was not killed and neither crucified, but "it was made to appear to them": Most Islamic traditions categorically deny that Jesus physically died on the cross or otherwise. According to the Quran, he was not
crucified, but was rather saved by God. (Although the earliest Islamic traditions and exegesis quote somewhat conflicting reports regarding a death and its length, Muslims believe that Jesus did not die on the cross, but believe that he was saved by being
raised alive to heaven.) A minority, especially among the
falāsifa, and some
Ismāʿīlī interpreted
walākin s̲h̲ubbiha lahum as meaning that the Jews intended to annihilate Jesus completely; but in fact, they crucified only his
nāsūt (form), yet his
lāhūt remained alive. The view is also recalled by some
Sufis.
Substitution It is unclear exactly where the substitution interpretation originated, but some scholars consider the theory originating among certain Gnostic groups of the second century. Some disagreement and discord can be seen beginning with Ibn Ishaq's ( 761) report of a brief accounting of events leading up to the crucifixion, firstly stating that Jesus was replaced by someone named Sergius, while secondly reporting an account of Jesus' tomb being located at Medina, and thirdly citing the places in the Quran (, ) that God took Jesus up to himself.
Michael Cook notes that denial that Jesus died follows the Christian heresy of
docetism, who were "disturbed by that God should have died", but that this concern conflicts with another Islamic doctrine, that Jesus was a man, not God. According to
Todd Lawson, Quranic commentators seem to have concluded the denial of the crucifixion of Jesus by following material interpreted in Tafsir that relied upon
extra-biblical Judeo-Christian sources, with the earliest textual evidence having originated from a non-Muslim source – a misreading of the Christian writings of
John of Damascus regarding the literal understandings of docetism (exegetical doctrine describing spiritual and physical realities of Jesus as understood by men in logical terms) as opposed to their figurative explanations. John of Damascus highlighted the Quran's assertion that the Jews did not crucify Jesus being very different from saying that Jesus was not crucified, explaining that it is the varied Quranic exegetes in Tafsir, and not the Quran itself, that denies the crucifixion, further stating that the message in the verse simply affirms the historicity of the event.
Symbolic interpretations Ja'far ibn Mansur al-Yaman ( 958),
Abu Hatim Ahmad ibn Hamdan al-Razi ( 935),
Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani ( 971),
Mu'ayyad fi'l-Din al-Shirazi ( 1078) and the group
Ikhwan al-Safa also affirm the historicity of the Crucifixion, reporting Jesus was crucified and not substituted by another man as maintained by many other popular Quranic commentators and Tafsir. More recently,
Mahmoud M. Ayoub, a professor and scholar, provided a more symbolic interpretation for Surah 4 Verse 157: Ayoub, instead of interpreting the passage as a denial of the death of Jesus, instead believes the passage is about God denying men the power to vanquish and destroy God's message. The words "but they killed him not, nor crucified him" are meant to show that any power humans believe that they have against God is illusory. Some
Sunni Islamic
exegesists, such as the anti-Christian polemicist
Muhammad Rashid Rida, held an ambiguous stance on the matter, namely that the
crucifixion and ascension of Jesus were allegorical, but with extreme precaution, in order to rebut Christian doctrines on crucifixion and
salvation. Comprehensively denouncing Christian doctrines on salvation,
atonement and crucifixion as irrational and (disbelief) in his , Rida also denounced the
Jews for their killings of the
Prophets of God, writing: As an early exegesis of verse ,
Al-Tabari ( 923) records an interpretation attributed to
Ibn 'Abbas, who used the literal "I will cause you to die" () in place of the metaphorical ('Jesus died'), while
Wahb ibn Munabbih, an early Jewish convert, is reported to have said "God caused Jesus, son of Mary, to die for three hours during the day, then took him up to himself." Tabari further transmits from Ibn Ishaq: "God caused Jesus to die for seven hours", while at another place reported that a person called Sergius was crucified in place of Jesus. Ibn-al-Athir forwarded the report that it was
Judas, the betrayer, while also mentioning the possibility it was a man named Natlianus. In reference to the Quranic quote "We have surely killed Jesus the Christ, son of Mary, the apostle of God" (), Muslim scholar Mahmoud Ayoub asserts this boast not as the repeating of a historical lie or the perpetuating of a false report, but an example of human arrogance and folly with an attitude of contempt towards God and his messenger(s). Ayoub furthers what modern scholars of Islam interpret regarding the historical death of Jesus, the man, as man's inability to kill off God's Word and the Spirit of God, which the Quran testifies were embodied in Jesus Christ. Ayoub continues highlighting the denial of the killing of Jesus as God denying men such power to vanquish and destroy the divine Word. The words, "they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him" speaks to the profound events of ephemeral human history, exposing mankind's heart and conscience towards God's will. The claim of humanity to have this power against God is illusory. "They did not slay him... but it seemed so to them" speaks to the imaginations of mankind, not the denial of the actual event of Jesus dying physically on the cross. Another report from Ibn Kathir quotes Ishaq Ibn Bishr, on authority of Idris, on authority of Wahb ibn Munabbih, that "God caused him to die for three days, then resurrected him, then raised him."
Al-Masudi ( 956) reported the death of Christ under
Tiberius.
Ibn Kathir ( 1373) follows traditions which suggest that a crucifixion did occur, but not with Jesus. After the event, Ibn Kathir reports the people were divided into three groups following three different narratives: the
Jacobites believing "God remained with us as long as He willed and then He ascended to Heaven"; the
Nestorians believing "The son of God was with us as long as he willed until God raised him to heaven"; and the Muslims believing "The servant and messenger of God, Jesus, remained with us as long as God willed until God raised him to Himself." Islamic reformer Muhammad
Rashid Rida agrees with contemporary commentators interpreting the physical killing of Christ's apostleship as a metaphorical interpretation. Modern Islamic scholars like Sayyid
Muhammad Husayn Tabataba'i interpret the ascension of Jesus as spiritual, not physical. This interpretation is in accord with
Muʿtazila and Shia metaphorical explanations regarding anthropomorphic references to God in the Quran. Although not popular with traditional Sunni interpretations of the depiction of crucifixion, there has been much speculation and discussion in the effort of logically reconciling this topic. In ascetic Shia writings, Jesus is depicted having "ascended to heaven wearing a woolen shirt, spun and sewed by Mary, his mother. As he reached the heavenly regions, he was addressed, 'O Jesus, cast away from you the adornment of the world. After his ascension, his word is believed to have been altered. == Apocalyptic literature ==