Evangelical distinctives Most Sydney Anglicans stand within the
evangelical English
Puritan traditions. Evangelicals within the diocese see themselves as standing in the heritage of the
English Reformation and direct the diocese accordingly. As such the diocese officially holds to belief in the divine inspiration and authority of scripture in line with the official statement of Anglican belief, the "Articles of Religion" (more commonly known as the
Thirty-Nine Articles). • Identification of
church with the local congregation as opposed to a diocese or denomination. Sydney's ecclesiology, influenced by the former Principal and Vice-Principal of Moore College
David Broughton Knox and
Donald Robinson (later respectively Principal of
George Whitefield College and
Archbishop of Sydney) among others, believes that the church is God's people meeting around God's Word. This leads to church meetings being centred around the public reading, explanation and response to God's Word. Further, Anglicans in Sydney generally identify themselves primarily with their local congregation rather than a denomination or institution, and place less emphasis on the celebration of Holy Communion (called the
Eucharist by many Anglicans) than do Anglicans of many other dioceses. • The importance of
evangelism and a personal faith. Sydney Anglicans have been described as
fundamentalist and
sect-like by their opponents. They respond by arguing that whereas fundamentalists interpret all parts of the Bible
literally Evangelicals in Sydney interpret the Bible in the context of the literary genre.
Affiliation with Anglican doctrine For most of the last 450 years Anglicans worldwide have used the
Book of Common Prayer framed by Archbishop of Canterbury
Thomas Cranmer in 1549, revised significantly in 1552 and modified slightly in 1662. They have also subscribed to, or otherwise acknowledged as foundational, the
Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion as listed in the Book of Common Prayer. While the Book of Common Prayer is no longer used in many Sydney churches, the diocese still fully affirms the doctrine and principles embodied within it as they interpret them. In keeping with the theologically reformed character of the 39 Articles, the diocese holds the view that all church doctrine and traditions are subject to the authority of Scripture.
Disassociation from Anglican tradition There are some areas of church practice that are being challenged within the diocese that have potential ramifications for the wider
Anglican Communion. The system of episcopal order is under review with some eager to redefine some of the roles of the threefold order of deacons, priests and bishops. The diocese is considering whether the laying on of hands at
confirmation could be performed by the rector of the parish. Although confirmation by a priest is common practice in Orthodoxy and is permitted in certain circumstances in Roman Catholicism, in the Anglican tradition confirmation can only be celebrated by a bishop. In 2005, possibly as a precursor to this change, the diocese formally removed the requirement of confirmation prior to partaking of
communion for those who have been baptised as adults. However, it is common practice throughout the diocese to allow all adults who profess genuine repentance and Christian faith to receive
communion regardless of whether they have been baptised or confirmed.
Lay presidency (also known as "Lay Administration of Holy Communion") is being considered, whereby the
Lord's Supper could be celebrated by deacons and authorised laity, including women. According to current church law, only ordained priests and bishops are allowed to preside at the Lord's Supper. An ordinance to permit lay presidency was not proceeded with at the diocesan synod in 2005 due to concerns regarding its legality. However, this issue hasn't died and new motions are being drafted ready to be put before the next diocesan synod. In October 2008, the
Australian Church Record and the
Anglican Church League published ''The Lord's Supper in Human Hands. Who Should Administer?'', which describes the forty-year discussion of this issue in Sydney and summarises the debate. Although Sydney was not the first diocese, nor the only one, in which this issue has been raised, it has been discussed within the diocese for a number of years. This publication has been widely distributed so that the Anglican Communion might examine and consider Sydney's discussions.
Liturgical practice Few churches sing canticles and responses, either from the 1662
Book of Common Prayer or
An Australian Prayer Book. The term "meeting" is sometimes used interchangeably with "service". The most notable example of this is
St Andrew's Cathedral. Many meetings at Evangelical churches in the diocese do not use a prayer book or a liturgical form of service. There is often an early morning (e.g. 8.00 am) service that follows Morning Prayer or Holy Communion from
An Australian Prayer Book. Even where no formal liturgy is used many core elements of Anglican liturgy may still be used for congregational participation, such as a corporate confession of sin, saying of creeds and corporate prayers. A screen and projector may be used in place of books. Lay or congregational participation in Sydney churches also occurs through Bible readings, leading intercessory prayer, leading the meetings, testimonies and interviews, singing and playing music. In many parishes fermented communion wine has been replaced with grape juice. Predominantly, the reason given for this is to be sensitive to people for whom alcohol could cause a problem.
Vestments Since 1911 the diocese has prohibited the wearing of the
chasuble, a
vestment now generally worn elsewhere in Australia for the celebration of the
Eucharist. Traditionally in Sydney most clergy have worn the
choir habit for all services but a few have also worn a
cope and stole when celebrating the Eucharist and at certain other services. This prohibition against chasubles was originated by
Archbishop Wright, an English Evangelical, who did so on the basis that the vestment was deemed illegal, relying on decisions of the English ecclesiastical courts as finally upheld in the
Privy Council in Read v Bishop of Lincoln [1892] AC 664 (see also
Ritualist movement). The main objection to this vestment in the mind of Sydney Anglicans is that it is associated with the
high church idea of a
"sacrificing" priesthood. That idea is contrary to Sydney's
low church views of both Holy Communion and of the role and function of the ordained ministry. The archbishop's practice has since been codified by a synod ordinance, making Sydney the only diocese in the whole Anglican Communion that continues to ban the wearing of chasubles, reinforcing the perceived ongoing disapproval of Anglo-Catholics in the diocese. The cope, therefore, is often worn at Anglo-Catholic churches where the celebrant at the Eucharist would conventionally wear the chasuble. In general those clergy who robe wear a cassock, surplice, scarf and, occasionally, also an academic hood. Since about 1990 there has sometimes been a practice of wearing a long surplice without a cassock, particularly through the summer. Most clergy in the diocese, however, dispense even with these robes, conducting church services in street clothes ranging from a suit and tie or
clerical collar, to smart casual attire. ==Influential people==