Calvinism Puritanism broadly refers to a diverse religious reform movement in Britain that was committed to the
Continental Reformed tradition. While Puritans did not agree upon all doctrinal points, most of them shared similar doctrines about the nature of
God, human
sinfulness, and the relationship between God and mankind. They believed that all of their beliefs should be based upon the
Bible, which they considered to be
divinely inspired. The concept of covenant was extremely important to Puritans, and
covenant theology was central to their beliefs. With roots in the writings of the Reformed theologians
John Calvin and
Heinrich Bullinger, covenant theology was further developed by the Puritan theologians
Dudley Fenner,
William Perkins,
John Preston,
Richard Sibbes,
William Ames, and, most fully by Ames's Dutch student,
Johannes Cocceius. Covenant theology asserts that when God created
Adam and Eve, he promised them
eternal life in return for perfect obedience, and this promise was termed "the covenant of
works". After the
fall of man, human nature was corrupted by
original sin, and therefore unable to fulfill the covenant of works, since each person inevitably violated God's law as expressed in the
Ten Commandments. As sinners, every person deserved
damnation. Puritans shared with other Calvinists a belief in
double predestination, that some people (the
elect) were destined by God to receive
grace and
salvation while others were destined for
Hell. No one, however, could
merit salvation. According to covenant theology,
Jesus's sacrifice on the cross made possible the covenant of grace, by which people who are selected by God could be saved. Puritans believed in
unconditional election and
irresistible grace, which means that God's grace was given freely without condition to the elect, and could not be refused.
Conversion Covenant theology made individual salvation deeply personal. It held that God's predestination was not "impersonal and mechanical", but was a "covenant of grace" that one entered into by
faith. Therefore, being a Christian could never be reduced to simple "intellectual acknowledgment" of the truth of Christianity. Puritans agreed that the
effectual call of each elect
saint of God would always come as an individuated personal encounter with God's promises. The process by which the elect are brought from
spiritual death to spiritual life (
regeneration) was described as
conversion. Early on, Puritans did not consider a specific conversion experience normative or necessary, but many gained
assurance of salvation from such experiences. Over time, however, Puritan theologians developed a framework for authentic religious experience based upon their own experiences, as well as those of their parishioners. Eventually, Puritans came to regard a specific conversion experience as an essential mark of one's election. The Puritan conversion experience was commonly described as occurring in discrete phases. It began with a preparatory phase that was designed to produce contrition for sin via introspection,
Bible study, and listening to
preaching. This was followed by humiliation, when the sinner realized that he or she was helpless to break free from sin, and that their good works could never earn forgiveness. It was after reaching this point (the realization that salvation was possible only because of divine
mercy) that the person would experience
justification, when the righteousness of Jesus is
imputed to the elect, and their minds and hearts are regenerated. For some Puritans, this was a dramatic experience, and they referred to it as being "
born again". Confirming that such a conversion had actually happened often required prolonged and continual introspection. The historian
Perry Miller wrote that the Puritans "liberated men from the treadmill of
indulgences and
penances, but cast them on the iron couch of introspection". It was expected that conversion would be followed by
sanctification, which is described as "the progressive growth in the saint's ability to better perceive and seek God's will, and thus to lead a holy life". Some Puritans attempted to find assurance of their faith via keeping detailed records of their behavior and looking for the evidence of salvation in their lives. Puritan clergy wrote many spiritual guides to help their parishioners pursue personal
piety and sanctification. These included
Arthur Dent's ''The Plain Man's Pathway to Heaven'' (1601),
Richard Rogers's Seven Treatises (1603),
Henry Scudder's ''Christian's Daily Walk'' (1627), and Richard Sibbes's
The Bruised Reed and Smoking Flax (1630). Too much emphasis upon one's good works could be criticized for being too close to
Arminianism, and too much emphasis upon subjective religious experience could be criticized as
Antinomianism. Many Puritans relied upon both personal religious experience and self-examination to assess their spiritual condition. Puritanism's experiential piety would be inherited by the
evangelical Protestants of the 1700s. While evangelical doctrines about conversion were heavily influenced by Puritan theology, the Puritans believed that assurance of one's salvation was rare, late in life, and "the fruit of struggle in the experience of believers", whereas evangelicals believed that assurance was normative for all people who were truly converted.
Worship and sacraments While most Puritans were members of the Church of England, they were critical of its worship practices. In the 17th century, Sunday worship in the established church took the form of the
Morning Prayer service in the
Book of Common Prayer. This may include a sermon, but Holy Communion or the Lord's Supper was only occasionally observed. Officially, lay people were only required to receive communion three times a year, but most people only received communion once a year at Easter. Puritans were concerned about biblical errors and Catholic remnants within the prayer book. Puritans objected to bowing at the name of Jesus, the requirement that priests wear the
surplice, and the use of written, set prayers in place of improvised prayers. The sermon was central to Puritan piety. It was not only a means of religious education; Puritans believed it was the most common way that God prepared a sinner's heart for conversion. On Sundays, Puritan ministers often shortened the liturgy to allow more time for preaching. Puritan churchgoers attended two sermons on Sundays and as many weekday sermons and lectures they could find, often traveling for miles. Still, many villagers could access sermons with ease. Due to the social patterns of New England, Puritan households were largely middle class and close in distance, so there was not much of a distance between a church goers and their church. Puritans were distinct for their adherence to
Sabbatarianism. Puritans taught that there were two
sacraments: baptism and the Lord's Supper. Puritans agreed with the church's practice of
infant baptism. However, the effect of baptism was disputed. Puritans objected to the prayer book's assertion of
baptismal regeneration. In Puritan theology, infant baptism was understood in terms of covenant theology—baptism replaced
circumcision as a sign of the covenant and marked a child's admission into the
visible church. It could not be assumed that baptism produces regeneration. The Westminster Confession states that the grace of baptism is only effective for those who are among the elect, and its effects lie dormant until one experiences conversion later in life. Puritans wanted to do away with
godparents, who made
baptismal vows on behalf of infants, and give that responsibility to the child's father. Puritans also objected to priests making the
sign of the cross in baptism. Private baptisms were opposed because Puritans believed that preaching should always accompany sacraments. Some Puritan clergy even refused to baptise dying infants because that implied the sacrament contributed to salvation. Puritans rejected both Roman Catholic (
transubstantiation) and Lutheran (
sacramental union) teachings that Christ is physically present in the
bread and
wine of the Lord's Supper. Instead, Puritans embraced the Reformed doctrine of
real spiritual presence, believing that in the Lord's Supper the faithful receive Christ spiritually. In agreement with
Thomas Cranmer, the Puritans stressed "that Christ comes down to us in the sacrament by His Word and Spirit, offering Himself as our spiritual food and drink". They criticised the prayer book service for being too similar to the Catholic mass. For example, the requirement that people kneel to receive communion implied
adoration of the Eucharist, a practice linked to transubstantiation. Puritans also criticised the Church of England for allowing unrepentant sinners to receive communion. Puritans wanted better spiritual preparation (such as clergy home visits and testing people on their knowledge of the catechism) for communion and better
church discipline to ensure that the unworthy were kept from the sacrament. Puritans did not believe
confirmation was necessary and thought candidates were poorly prepared since bishops did not have the time to examine them properly. The marriage service was criticised for using a wedding ring (which implied that marriage was a sacrament) and having the groom vow to his bride "with my body I thee worship", which Puritans considered
blasphemous. In the funeral service, the priest committed the body to the ground "in sure and certain hope of resurrection to eternal life, through our Lord Jesus Christ." Puritans objected to this phrase because they did not believe it was true for everyone. They suggested it be rewritten as "we commit his body [etc.] believing a resurrection of the just and unjust, some to joy, and some to punishment." Puritans eliminated choral music and
musical instruments in their religious services because these were associated with Roman Catholicism; however, singing the
Psalms was considered appropriate (see
Exclusive psalmody). Church organs were commonly damaged or destroyed in the Civil War period, such as when an axe was taken to the organ of
Worcester Cathedral in 1642.
Ecclesiology with a
Catalogue of Sects, 1647 While the Puritans were united in their goal of furthering the English Reformation, they were always divided over issues of
ecclesiology and church polity, specifically questions that relate to the manner of organizing congregations, how individual congregations should relate with one another, and whether
established national churches were scriptural. On these questions, Puritans divided between supporters of
episcopal polity,
presbyterian polity, and
congregational polity. The episcopalians (known as the
prelatical party) were conservatives, who supported retaining bishops if those leaders supported reform and agreed to share power with local churches. They also supported the idea of having a
Book of Common Prayer, but they were against demanding strict conformity or having too much ceremony. In addition, these Puritans called for a renewal of preaching,
pastoral care, and Christian
discipline within the Church of England. Like the episcopalians, the presbyterians agreed that there should be a national church, but one that is structured upon the model of the
Church of Scotland. They wanted to replace bishops with a system of elective and representative governing bodies of clergy and
laity (local
sessions,
presbyteries,
synods, and ultimately a national
general assembly). During the
Interregnum, the presbyterians had limited success at reorganizing the Church of England. The
Westminster Assembly proposed the creation of a presbyterian system, but the
Long Parliament left implementation to local authorities. As a result, the Church of England never developed a complete presbyterian hierarchy.
Congregationalists or
Independents believed in the autonomy of the local church, which ideally would be a congregation of "visible saints" (meaning those who had experienced conversion). Members would be required to abide by a
church covenant, in which they "pledged to join in the proper worship of God and to nourish each other in the search for further religious truth". Such churches were regarded as complete within themselves, with full authority to determine their own membership, administer their own discipline, and ordain their own ministers. Furthermore, the sacraments would only be administered to those in the church covenant. Most congregational Puritans remained within the Church of England, hoping to reform it according to their own doctrines. The
New England Congregationalists were also adamant that they were not separating from the Church of England. However, some Puritans equated the Church of England with the Roman Catholic Church, and therefore considered it to be no Christian church at all. These groups, such as the
Brownists, would split from the established church, and become known as Separatists. Other Separatists embraced more radical positions, particularly on the subject of
believer's baptism, and became early
Baptists.
Church and State Calvin taught that if worldly rulers rise-up against God, then they should be put down, which could be hard to reconcile with the claims of
divine right monarchy. Puritan doctrines on church and state were also affected by their doctrines about church governance, with people who favoured more centralised models tending to favour a closer relationship between the church and the state, as well as other foreign models and their changing relationship with the English state. The initial Puritan vision on the proper relationship between
church and state in England was of an established
reformed national church on the model of
Calvin's Geneva, who had been more careful than the previous reformers
Luther and
Zwingli to keep church structures and city authorities apart. Geneva
hosted many of the
Marian exiles of the 1550s, who formed the core of the early Puritans. The fellow exile
John Knox had
implemented a reformed
national church in the neighbouring
Kingdom of Scotland in the early 1560s. Despite the
Elizabethan Settlement of 1559 creating a
Protestant Church of England with many Calvinist bishops, the
vestments controversy of the 1570s did show the limits of Puritan influence upon the church. Many
Independents, did not support a compulsory national church, but believed that civil government should enforce
godly discipline by upholding the
moral teachings of Scripture. However, a minority of
Puritan Separatists known as
Brownists, from as early as the 1580s, rejected the notion of a state church altogether, and argued for congregations to remain independent from civil power, with another Separatist
Roger Williams in 1636 setting-up
Providence Plantations with a formal
separation of church and state. During the
Interregnum, led by the Independent
Oliver Cromwell, starting in 1649, the
parish system was retained, and ministers were financed via
tithes, but oversight was exercised by state-appointed commissions such as the
Triers and Ejectors, allowing a range of Protestant congregations to receive support while excluding Catholics and radical sects. On 27 September 1650, the
Rump Parliament of the
Commonwealth of England passed
an Act repealing the
Act of Supremacy,
Act of Uniformity, and all laws making
recusancy a crime. There was no longer a legal requirement to attend the parish church on Sundays (for both Protestants and Catholics). In 1653, responsibility for recording births, marriages, and deaths was transferred from the church to a civil registrar. The result was that church baptisms and marriages became private acts, not guarantees of legal rights, which provided greater equality to dissenters. The 1653
Instrument of Government guaranteed that in matters of religion, "none shall be compelled by penalties or otherwise, but endeavours be used to win them by sound Doctrine and the Example of a good conversation". Religious freedom was given to "all who profess Faith in God by Jesus Christ". However, Catholics and some others were excluded. No one was executed for their religion during
the Protectorate. In London, people who attended Catholic mass or Anglican holy communion were occasionally arrested, but released without charge. Many unofficial Protestant congregations, such as Baptist churches, were permitted to meet. Quakers were allowed to publish freely and to hold meetings. They were, however, arrested for disrupting parish church services and organising
tithe-strikes against the state church. After the
Great Ejection of 1662 expelled Puritans from the
Church of England, most of them became
nonconformists, worshipping outside of the established church.
Family life , Based on Biblical portrayals of
Adam and Eve, Puritans believed that marriage was rooted in procreation, love, and, most importantly, salvation. Husbands were the spiritual heads of the household, while women were to demonstrate religious piety and obedience under male authority. Furthermore, marriage represented not only the relationship between husband and wife, but also the relationship between spouses and God. Puritan husbands commanded authority through family direction and prayer. The female relationship to her husband and to God was marked by submissiveness and humility.
Thomas Gataker describes Puritan marriage as: The paradox created by female inferiority in the public sphere and the spiritual equality of men and women in marriage, then, gave way to the informal authority of women concerning matters of the home and childrearing. With the consent of their husbands, wives made important decisions concerning the labour of their children, property, and the management of inns and taverns owned by their husbands. Pious Puritan mothers laboured for their children's righteousness and salvation, connecting women directly to matters of religion and morality. In her poem titled "In Reference to her Children", poet
Anne Bradstreet reflects on her role as a mother: Bradstreet alludes to the
temporality of motherhood by comparing her children to a flock of birds on the precipice of leaving home. While Puritans praised the obedience of young children, they also believed that, by separating children from their mothers at adolescence, children could better sustain a superior relationship with God. A child could only be redeemed through religious education and obedience. Girls carried the additional burden of Eve's corruption and were
catechised separately from boys at adolescence. Boys' education prepared them for vocations and leadership roles, while girls were educated for domestic and religious purposes. The pinnacle of achievement for children in Puritan society, however, occurred with the conversion process. Puritans viewed the relationship between master and servant similarly to that of parent and child. Just as parents were expected to uphold Puritan religious values in the home, masters assumed the parental responsibility of housing and educating young servants. Older servants also dwelt with masters and were cared for in the event of illness or injury. African-American and Indian servants were likely excluded from such benefits.
Gender and punishment Many Puritan communities operated under strict values that determined gender roles and generally “pure” behavior. Many of these values were shaped from their interpretation of the
Bible. If anyone in the community was found to have disobeyed or strayed from these values, they would be reported and put through the
censure process. This involved a public confession from the accused of their wrongdoings. People would be censured for things that ranged from immodesty and cursing to domestic abuse and fornication. Religious leaders would often make an example of the censured individual by turning their experience into a lesson for the
congregation. In some cases,
ministers or
elders would meet with an individual to counsel them for a “private sin,” such as
impiety or struggles with faith, before taking public action. In 1648, Puritan minister
Thomas Hooker explained the necessity of church discipline: “[God] hath appointed Church-censures as good Physick, to purge out what is evill, as well as Word and Sacraments, which, like good diet, are sufficient to nourish the soul to eternal life.” They saw these practices as necessary for the community to keep each other in check and in line with their “godly paths.” While Puritan doctrine viewed men and women spiritually equal,
laymen reinterpreted
spirituality to reflect their ideas of
masculinity. Men displayed their spirituality through their public actions and behaviors, such as being a good neighbor to the community and father to their families. Women were expected to reflect their inner spirituality with their entire being. The human soul was often described using feminine language, but men were allowed to separate their mind and body from their souls in order to maintain an image of masculinity on the outside. The husband was the
patriarch with ultimate authority, and the wife would be his assistant. If any of the other members of the family misbehaved, such as the children or even their mother, their actions reflected the capability of the father to be the head of the household. Thus, men were often called out for not fulfilling their role as a good father, husband, and/or neighbor. As a result of this reinterpretation of the Puritan doctrine to reflect certain gendered beliefs, the things men and women were censured for differed. For example, women were often associated with “
Eve,” a temptress and sinful seductress. This led to women being censured for
fornication far more often than men. Men, on the other hand, had more of a focus on civil duty, being censured for filing false lawsuits, arguing over property lines, charging inflated prices, tearing down a neighbor’s mill, land fraud, or poor military conduct. In the economic sphere, women lacked formal power. Thus, men were censured more often for poor business practices. The audience played a large role in censures, listening for certain words that demonstrated the accused was truly remorseful for their actions. Similar to the distinction between female and male spirituality, the language women and men used in their confessions differed. The feminized language expected from women included words such as “shame,” “wounded,” “great sin,” “nature,” “pity,” “evil,” “poor,” and “grief.” On the other hand, men used more objective phrases such as “rules,” breach,” offense,” desire,” forgiveness,” actions,” and “brethren.” The difference in treatment for men and women was reflected even in the specific sins they were accused of committing. As stated earlier, women were rarely censured for economic disputes as they lacked influence in that regard. Thus, if a commercial dispute involving a woman were to arise, the congregation treated her differently than a man. Such was the case for a woman named Chaplain: “In 1696, Dorchester’s Sister Chaplain borrowed money from John Green to buy a shipment of wine. When Green died and his estate tried to collect the debt from Chaplain, she refused. The congregation did not cite her for breaking a contract, but censured her for lying.” Women would also at times face harsher punishments than men for the same sin. “Boston's Second Church censured John Farnum for making bad comments about another church and its pastor, and they noted he was "breaking the rule of truth." However, that same congregation recorded much harsher words about Sarah Stevens, whom they admonished for "many evill carriages and sundry filthy speeches, not fit to be named." And when they censured her, they said she "grew more vile and hard hearted." The court also took up her case and sentenced her to jail and two whippings.”
Demonology and witch hunts Like most Christians in the
early modern period, Puritans believed in the active existence of the
devil and
demons as evil forces that could possess and cause harm to men and women. There was also widespread belief in
witchcraft and witches—persons in league with the devil. "Unexplained phenomena such as the death of livestock, human disease, and hideous fits suffered by young and old" may all be blamed on the agency of the devil or a witch. Puritan pastors undertook
exorcisms for
demonic possession in some high-profile cases. Exorcist
John Darrell was supported by
Arthur Hildersham in the case of Thomas Darling.
Samuel Harsnett, a sceptic on witchcraft and possession, attacked Darrell. However, Harsnett was in the minority, and many clergy, not only Puritans, believed in witchcraft and possession. In the 16th and 17th centuries, thousands of people throughout Europe were accused of being witches and executed. In England and Colonial America, Puritans engaged in
witch hunts as well. In the 1640s,
Matthew Hopkins, the self-proclaimed "Witchfinder General", whose career flourished during Puritan rule, was responsible for accusing over two hundred people of witchcraft, mainly in
East Anglia. Between 1644 and 1647, Hopkins and his colleague
John Stearne sent more accused people to the
gallows than all the other witch-hunters in England of the previous 160 years. In New England, few people were accused and convicted of witchcraft before 1692; there were at most sixteen convictions. The
Salem witch trials of 1692 had a lasting impact on the historical reputation of New England Puritans. Though this witch hunt occurred after Puritans lost political control of the
Massachusetts colony, Puritans instigated the judicial proceedings against the accused and comprised the members of the court that convicted and sentenced the accused. By the time Governor
William Phips ended the trials, fourteen women and five men had been hanged as witches. The main accusation brought against witches was evidence of
maleficium, which referred to a witch's meddling of misfortune such as dead livestock or illness. At Salem, the concern was primarily about the spectral possession and torment, or bewitchment, of the young female victims, especially torment that occurred in the courtroom. Many clergymen refer to this bewitchment as having a direct relation to the Devil, more so than
maleficium. Though men and women were both tried for witchcraft, the accusations were skewed toward women. About 78 percent of accused witches in New England were women, and those women were often societal pariahs: poor, homeless, childless, or women with inherited property. Men accused of witchcraft tended to have familial or sexual relations with female witches. In the Salem witch trials, six male witches were accused, and four of them had wives who were also accused, and several has accusations of domestic violence or murder. There was a clear correlation between women and violence in New England witchcraft accusations.
Millennialism Puritan
millennialism has been placed in the broader context of European Reformed beliefs about the millennium and interpretation of
biblical prophecy, for which representative figures of the period were
Johannes Piscator,
Thomas Brightman,
Joseph Mede,
Johannes Heinrich Alsted, and
John Amos Comenius. Like most English Protestants of the time, Puritans based their eschatological beliefs upon a
historicist interpretation of the
Book of Revelation and the
Book of Daniel. Protestant theologians identified the sequential phases that the world must pass through before the
Last Judgment could occur, and tended to place their own time period near the end. It was expected that tribulation and persecution would increase, but eventually the church's enemies, namely the
Antichrist (identified with the Roman Catholic Church) and the
Ottoman Empire, would be defeated. Based upon
Revelation 20, it was believed that a thousand-year period (the millennium) would occur, during which the saints would rule with Jesus on Earth. In contrast to other Protestants who tended to view eschatology as an explanation for "God's remote plans for the world and man", Puritans understood it to describe "the cosmic environment in which the regenerate soldier of Christ was now to do battle against the power of sin". On a personal level, eschatology was related to sanctification, assurance of salvation, and the conversion experience. On a larger level, eschatology was the lens through which events such as the English Civil War and the
Thirty Years' War were interpreted. There was also an optimistic aspect to Puritan millennianism: Puritans anticipated a future worldwide religious revival before the
Second Coming of Jesus. Another departure from other Protestants was the widespread belief among Puritans that the
conversion of the Jews to Christianity was an important sign of the
apocalypse. == Cultural consequences ==