In 1781, the Swedish botanist
Olof Swartz introduced the species as
Lichen vermicularis from the alpine regions of
Lapland, where he found it among grasses and mosses. He described a smooth,
fruticose lichen forming prostrate, diffuse, worm-like branchlets; the branches were nearly cylindrical and hollow, awl-tipped and variably but rather sparsely branched, with scattered, lateral tubercles that he interpreted as
fruiting bodies. Swartz compared it with
Lichen subulatus but separated it by its milky colour, its diffuse, sprawling habit, and those rounded lateral tubercles. The
epithet vermicularis reflects his remark that the plant recalls "ascarides" (
intestinal worms). In North America, a
common name used for the species is "whiteworm lichen". In the decades after Swartz's description, the species was shifted among several early generic concepts. Authors transferred it in turn to
Stereocaulon,
Baeomyces,
Cladonia and
Cenomyce, and
Samuel Frederick Gray even proposed the competing generic name
Cerania for the same
taxon. Others reduced it to
varieties under allied
Cladonia species (
C. uncialis,
C. amaurocraea and
C. gracilis) or treated it as
Patellaria fusca var.
vermicularis.
Generic name and accepted combination Maurice Choisy later emphasized that
Thamnolia (as used from
Ludwig Schaerer's 1850 treatment) corresponds to Gray's earlier genus
Cerania (1821), and noted that several authors preferred
Cerania, treating the two names as strictly
synonymous. Schaerer's
Thamnolia (1850) was published without awareness of Gray's earlier
Cerania (1821), but
Thamnolia was subsequently
conserved over
Cerania and remains the accepted name. The modern combination,
Thamnolia vermicularis, was formalized by Schaerer in 1850 and has been the standard usage since.
Chemotypes and historical usage Thamnolia vermicularis occurs in two chemically defined
chemotypes. One produces
squamatic and
baeomycesic acids and
fluoresces yellow under
ultraviolet light (UV+), whereas the other produces
thamnolic acid and does not fluoresce under UV light (UV−). These chemical variants are not morphologically distinguishable and may occur together, but they show a broad biogeographical trend: the UV+ (squamatic/baeomycesic) form is more frequent in the Northern Hemisphere, while the UV− (thamnolic) form is more common in the Southern Hemisphere. The two forms have often been treated separately in the past, with the UV+ chemotype sometimes referred to as
T. subuliformis (or as
T. vermicularis subsp.
subuliformis). Molecular studies have not supported treating the chemotypes as separate taxa, and they are generally treated as chemical variants rather than as taxonomic units. A comparative study using the traditional separation of
T. vermicularis and
T. subuliformis reported that the two can be distinguished by
ultraviolet fluorescence, standard chemical
spot tests, and
thin-layer chromatography (TLC) of
lichen products, with TLC providing the most detailed chemical separation.
Regional application of names in North America In North America, the name
Thamnolia vermicularis has historically been misapplied to material treated in earlier molecular work as
T. subuliformis; under that interpretation,
T. vermicularis sensu stricto was considered referable only to European material. Troy McMullin (2023) reported that North American material outside western Alaska is conspecific, and noted that some western Alaskan collections with baeomycesic and squamatic acids are now called
T. tundrae. He also stated that
T. tundrae cannot be separated from the baeomycesic and squamatic acid chemotype of
T. subuliformis using morphology or chemistry, and requires DNA data for reliable identification.
Molecular lineages and species limits Modern molecular work has suggested that material traditionally identified as
Thamnolia vermicularis represents a complex of morphologically cryptic
lineages. In 2018 Onuţ‐Brännström and colleagues, using
internal transcribed spacer (ITS) data, additional nuclear markers, and type material, treated three well-supported lineages as separate species:
T. vermicularis s. str.,
T. subuliformis s. str. (
sensu stricto, in the strict sense), and the newly described
T. tundrae. Under their interpretation,
T. vermicularis s. str. has a uniform secondary chemistry (thamnolic acid) and a restricted distribution in the European Alps, the
Tatra Mountains and the
Western Carpathians, whereas
T. subuliformis s. str. is widespread and includes two chemotypes. They concluded that secondary chemistry alone is not reliable for delimiting species in
Thamnolia, but that chemistry together with geographical origin can be informative, and that ITS data can be used for species recognition.
Infraspecific treatments In some regional treatments, the chemotypes are nevertheless distinguished at infraspecific rank. In
Tasmania they can be
sympatric but typically do not grow intermixed and show a degree of geographical separation, and they are maintained as varieties on that basis. In a Tasmanian treatment, the two forms are keyed by spot tests and chemistry: var.
vermicularis contains thamnolic acid (K+ strong yellow; P+ orange; UV± dull orange), whereas var.
subuliformis contains baeomycesic and squamatic acids (K± faint yellow; P+ yellow; UV+ yellow).
Yasuhiko Asahina (1937) also interpreted
Thamnolia vermicularis in a broad sense as comprising two chemically distinct entities, and argued that the traditional division into
f. subuliformis and f.
taurica was blurred by intermediates and did not provide a clear boundary. He proposed retaining the name
T. vermicularis for material that often discolours in storage and describing
T. subvermicularis for the non-discolouring material, and on that basis described
Thamnolia subvermicularis from part of the
Hokkaido material then placed under
T. vermicularis. He separated it by chemistry, reporting that the thallus is weakly K+ (yellow) and PD+ (yellow) and contains squamatic acid and baeomycesic acid, and by form, describing smooth, narrow, many-branched, cylindrical lobes with pointed tips (about 2–3.5 mm thick). It is now considered a synonym of
T. vermicularis.
Reproductive structures and historical misinterpretations The taxonomic history of
Thamnolia vermicularis has also been shaped by uncertainty over its reproductive structures. Early descriptions included reports of both
sexual and
asexual structures, with lichenologists such as
Abramo Bartolommeo Massalongo and
Arthur Minks describing apothecia that later authors regarded as likely
parasitic in origin. Reports of pycnidia appeared in the 19th century and early 20th century but were later overlooked in much of the English-language literature; modern work has confirmed pycnidial conidiomata with conidia on
Thamnolia thalli, providing a plausible mechanism for long-distance
dispersal. Reports of apothecia in
Thamnolia refer to the parasite
Thamnogalla crombiei, and the lichen itself has never been observed fertile.
Typification and recent interpretations Onuţ‐Brännström and colleagues (2018) pointed out a mismatch between Swartz's "Lapponia" protologue and Culberson's neotypification, noting that
T. vermicularis as typified by Culberson's
neotype is not known from Lapland and that the neotype would nevertheless have to be followed until material from the original Lapland locality could be genetically analysed. To stabilize usage, Jørgensen (2019) designated a neotype from
Stora Sjöfallet, Lule Lappmark, replacing Culberson's mixed and non-Lapland neotype (1963). On molecular grounds, Jørgensen (2019) treated the lineage diversity as three
subspecies: widespread subsp.
vermicularis, alpine subsp.
taurica (lectotypified from
Jacquin 1789 and epitypified with a sequenced Austrian collection), and Arctic subsp.
tundrae. He noted that these taxa are morphologically and chemically overlapping and cannot be separated without DNA data. A later synthesis argued that the three main lineages recovered in multi-
marker studies of
Thamnolia are better treated as distinct species, rather than as infraspecific taxa. It noted that Onuţ-Brännström and colleagues applied the name
T. subuliformis to the widespread lineage and
T. vermicularis s. str. to the alpine lineage, but that Jørgensen later corrected typification so that the widespread lineage would carry the name
T. vermicularis and the Alpine lineage the name
T. taurica. On that basis, it recommended recognizing
T. vermicularis for the widespread lineage (the taxon treated as
T. subuliformis by Onuţ-Brännström
et al.), together with
T. tundrae for the subarctic lineage and
T. taurica for the alpine lineage. ==Description==