Linkedness diagram for the Borromean rings. The vertical dotted black midline is a
Conway sphere separating the diagram into
2-tangles. In
knot theory, the Borromean rings are a simple example of a
Brunnian link, a link that cannot be separated but that falls apart into separate unknotted loops as soon as any one of its components is removed. There are infinitely many Brunnian links, and infinitely many three-curve Brunnian links, of which the Borromean rings are the simplest. There are a number of ways of seeing that the Borromean rings are linked. One is to use
Fox -colorings, colorings of the arcs of a link diagram with the integers
modulo so that at each crossing, the two colors at the undercrossing have the same average (modulo ) as the color of the overcrossing arc, and so that at least two colors are used. The number of colorings meeting these conditions is a
knot invariant, independent of the diagram chosen for the link. A trivial link with three components has n^3-n colorings, obtained from its standard diagram by choosing a color independently for each component and discarding the n colorings that only use one color. For standard diagram of the Borromean rings, on the other hand, the same pairs of arcs meet at two undercrossings, forcing the arcs that cross over them to have the same color as each other, from which it follows that the only colorings that meet the crossing conditions violate the condition of using more than one color. Because the trivial link has many valid colorings and the Borromean rings have none, they cannot be equivalent. The Borromean rings are an
alternating link, as their conventional
link diagram has crossings that alternate between passing over and under each curve, in order along the curve. They are also an
algebraic link, a link that can be decomposed by
Conway spheres into
2-tangles. They are the simplest alternating algebraic link which does not have a diagram that is simultaneously alternating and algebraic. It follows from the
Tait conjectures that the
crossing number of the Borromean rings (the fewest crossings in any of their link diagrams) is 6, the number of crossings in their alternating diagram.
Ring shape The Borromean rings are typically drawn with their rings projecting to circles in the plane of the drawing, but three-dimensional circular Borromean rings are an
impossible object: it is not possible to form the Borromean rings from circles in three-dimensional space. More generally proved using four-dimensional
hyperbolic geometry that no Brunnian link can be exactly circular. For three rings in their conventional Borromean arrangement, this can be seen from considering the
link diagram. If one assumes that two of the circles touch at their two crossing points, then they lie in either a plane or a sphere. In either case, the third circle must pass through this plane or sphere four times, without lying in it, which is impossible. Another argument for the impossibility of circular realizations, by
Helge Tverberg, uses
inversive geometry to transform any three circles so that one of them becomes a line, making it easier to argue that the other two circles do not link with it to form the Borromean rings. However, the Borromean rings can be realized using ellipses. These may be taken to be of
arbitrarily small eccentricity: no matter how close to being circular their shape may be, as long as they are not perfectly circular, they can form Borromean links if suitably positioned. A realization of the Borromean rings by three mutually perpendicular
golden rectangles can be found within a regular
icosahedron by connecting three opposite pairs of its edges. Every three unknotted
polygons in Euclidean space may be combined, after a suitable scaling transformation, to form the Borromean rings. If all three polygons are planar, then scaling is not needed. In particular, because the Borromean rings can be realized by three triangles, the minimum number of sides possible for each of its loops, the
stick number of the Borromean rings is nine. More generally,
Matthew Cook has
conjectured that any three unknotted simple closed curves in space, not all circles, can be combined without scaling to form the Borromean rings. After Jason Cantarella suggested a possible counterexample, Hugh Nelson Howards weakened the conjecture to apply to any three planar curves that are not all circles. On the other hand, although there are infinitely many Brunnian links with three links, the Borromean rings are the only one that can be formed from three convex curves.
Ropelength In knot theory, the
ropelength of a knot or link is the shortest length of flexible rope (of radius one) that can realize it. Mathematically, such a realization can be described by a smooth curve whose radius-one
tubular neighborhood avoids self-intersections. The minimum ropelength of the Borromean rings has not been proven, but the smallest value that has been attained is realized by three copies of a 2-lobed planar curve. Although it resembles an earlier candidate for minimum ropelength, constructed from four
circular arcs of radius two, it is slightly modified from that shape, and is composed from 42 smooth pieces defined by
elliptic integrals, making it shorter by a fraction of a percent than the piecewise-circular realization. It is this realization, conjectured to minimize ropelength, that was used for the
International Mathematical Union logo. Its length is \approx 58.006, while the best proven lower bound on the length is 12\pi\approx 37.699. For a discrete analogue of ropelength, the shortest representation using only edges of the
integer lattice, the minimum length for the Borromean rings is exactly 36. This is the length of a representation using three 2\times 4 integer rectangles, inscribed in
Jessen's icosahedron in the same way that the representation by golden rectangles is inscribed in the regular icosahedron.
Hyperbolic geometry of the Borromean rings, a
hyperbolic manifold formed from two ideal octahedra, seen repeatedly in this view. The rings are infinitely far away, at the octahedron vertices. The Borromean rings are a
hyperbolic link: the space surrounding the Borromean rings (their
link complement) admits a complete
hyperbolic metric of finite volume. Although hyperbolic links are now considered plentiful, the Borromean rings were one of the earliest examples to be proved hyperbolic, in the 1970s, and this link complement was a central example in the video
Not Knot, produced in 1991 by the
Geometry Center. Hyperbolic manifolds can be decomposed in a canonical way into gluings of hyperbolic polyhedra (the Epstein–Penner decomposition) and for the Borromean complement this decomposition consists of two
ideal regular octahedra. The
volume of the Borromean complement is 16\Lambda(\pi/4)=8G \approx 7.32772\dots where \Lambda is the
Lobachevsky function and G is
Catalan's constant. The complement of the Borromean rings is universal, in the sense that every closed 3-
manifold is a
branched cover over this space.
Number theory In
arithmetic topology, there is an analogy between
knots and
prime numbers in which one considers links between primes. The triple of primes are linked modulo 2 (the
Rédei symbol is −1) but are pairwise unlinked modulo 2 (the
Legendre symbols are all 1). Therefore, these primes have been called a "proper Borromean triple modulo 2" or "mod 2 Borromean primes". == Physical realizations ==