National Assembly With more than 60% of ballots counted, DPS was above the threshold while BSP–OL was not, with the CEC noting that PB had won about 45% and at least 132 seats, which was a majority in the 240-seat parliament. Reflecting the electorate's call for changes, Evelina Koleva, a manager at a digital marketing company in
Sofia, told Reuters: "There is now an opportunity for the things people have been hoping to see change to actually become visible." Addressing the cost of living, which was one of the election's key issues, Tihomir Bezlov, a senior fellow at the Centre for the Study of Democracy in Sofia, said: "The country's main challenge is the economic crisis and the demographic crisis ... There do not seem to be many ideas in the winning camp on either of these issues." Radev's PB received 44% of the vote and won an outright majority of seats, the first time a party or alliance has had a majority in the National Assembly since 1997. GERB–SDS lost half of its support, receiving 13% of the vote, while PP–DB received 12% of the vote, barely changing its result from the last election. Political scientist Svetlin Tachev argued that PP–DB would have received stronger support if Radev had not entered the electoral race.
Comparisons to Eurosceptic and pro-Russian governments The
Atlantic Council warned that a Radev-led government could "replace Hungary as Putin's proxy inside the EU and NATO", although it assessed that the influence would be "nowhere near that of Viktor Orbán, at least initially." It concluded that Radev's government would be bad news for Ukraine and would represent a significant win for Russia. Reuters reported that Radev's campaign drew comparisons with Orbán when he talked about improving ties with Moscow and resuming the free flow of Russian oil and gas into Europe. The
European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) published an analysis arguing that Radev would be closer to Fico than Orbán, is ready to criticise the
European Commission, especially on the
EU energy policy and the
European Green Deal, and would be tough on
EU's enlargement; however, it predicted that Radev would generally not try to block major EU decisions, such as on Ukraine, for fear of losing EU funds.
NIN also compared Radev to Fico rather than Orbán. In an interview, MEP
Radan Kanev said that Radev would be more likely to resemble Fico in "speaking one thing, [and] doing a different one."
Al Jazeera English reported that Radev's stance on foreign policy had drawn attention in Europe, leading to a "pro-Russian" label as he objected to a defence pact concluded between Bulgaria and Ukraine in March and had called for the resumption of Russian imports to Europe despite EU sanctions on Russian oil. The
BBC framed Radev as a "pragmatic, somewhat pro-Russian leader, who has criticised EU sanctions, and called for constructive dialogue with the Kremlin."
The Guardian described Radev as Moscow-friendly and concluded that it could be bad for the EU. Emilia Zankina of
Temple University Rome agreed, saying: "There is a great concern that he may try to steer the country away from its pro-European line." Bulgarian political expert Dimitar Bechev told
Politico that the biggest question is "what a future coalition will look like" and that Radev has to make a choice on the
rule of law, deciding whether to align with anti-corruption reformists or defend vested interests.
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said that "almost nothing is known about his intentions, especially in the area of financial and fiscal policy." == See also ==