Class 25/0 :
Number sequence (original) D5151–D5175, (TOPS) 25 001–25 025 The first 25 locos became known as
Class 25/0 and were built at the BR Darlington works using the newer "B" engine, modified generator assembly and traction motors. This increase in power was obtained from an air/water free flow intercooler fitted between a higher capacity pressure charger and inlet manifold, included within the normal cooling circuit to maintain simplicity. The cylinder head was also modified and strengthened. The
BTH generator, type RTB 15656, was rated as , 750/545
V, 1090/1500
A at 750
rpm, only slightly different from that used in the earlier Class 24s (Note that all Class 25 locomotives used a generator designated as BTH RTB 15656, but its rating and characteristics changed over time). The generator supplied four BTH 137BX traction motors connected in parallel and rated , 545 V, 375 A at 560 rpm with a gear ratio of 18:79 (to give a maximum speed). Maximum tractive effort was and continuous tractive effort was at , the latter standard for all Class 25s. Power at rail was , now available between 9.3 and . For the first fifteen locomotives fuel capacity was (design type 25 AV) and the final ten had larger
fuel tanks installed (design type 25 BV).
Class 25/1 in 1984 :
Number sequence (original) D5176–D5232, (TOPS) 25 026–25 082 The
Class 25/1 locomotives were built at BR Darlington and
Derby locomotive works. They featured the new
AEI 253AY traction motor, a result of the collaboration between BTH,
MV and American builder
Alco. This smaller, lighter motor was an attempt to market a traction motor to a worldwide audience, especially to the
metre gauge lines. For Class 25 locomotives these lighter motors meant the discontinuance of other weight saving measures being built into the design. They were highly rated in an attempt to overcome the loss of tractive effort normally found on starting. The field divert system was also modified to allow increased capability throughout all the speed ranges. The main generator was a 12-pole machine with the rating changed to , 780/545V, 1050/1500A at 750 rpm. (The continuous rating has also been quoted as , 630V, 1300A). The four traction motors were now connected as series parallel pairs being rated at , 315V, 650A at 460 rpm, with a gear ratio 18:67. Pairs of motors connected in series provided a higher maximum tractive effort (usually quoted as although could be achieved) but the downside being that a series pair connected machine was more prone to slipping than one with an all parallel grouping. Full power was available between 7 and , an improvement over Class 25/0 locomotives with all other ratings unchanged from the earlier series. The traction motor's continuous rating of 650 amps was not far removed from its one-hour short term or 'emergency' rating of 680 amps, and this could only be monitored manually. On heavy trains close monitoring of the ammeters was necessary to avoid motor damage. Though the body shell remained similar to D5151 there were a number of refinements. The
air horns were relocated to either side of the headcode panel. The cab skirt and body fairing were discontinued, though the support lugs remained. A new driving control panel was fitted. The fuel and
water tanks were also redesigned with a fuel capacity of (also quoted in sources as being ). There were initially two variants of this sub-class. The vast majority were boilered and designated 251 AV. The four without train heating were designated 251 BV. In due course, when it was decided to fit
dual braking to a number of locomotives, those previously 251 AV became 251 CX and one of the 251 BV (25032) became 251 DX.
Class 25/2 :
Number sequence (original) D5233–D5299, D7500–D7597 (TOPS) 25 083–25 247 in May 1965. The livery is BR green with small yellow warning panels. The
Class 25/2 locomotives featured restyled bodywork and two-tone green livery similar to that carried by the Brush Type 4 (
Class 47). The majority were built at BR Derby. The redesign principally affected two areas, the cab and the location of the air intakes. The gangway doors fitted to the earlier examples were rarely used, their presence adding to the complaints of noise and draughts in the cabs and the removal of these allowed the centre windscreen to be enlarged, so that its lower edge lined up with the windscreens on either side giving a noticeably different front end look. The removal of the air filters from the side air louvers to the cantrail was the result of a comparison carried out at Inverness between a batch of Derby built Type 2s and a batch of
BRCW Type 2s (
Class 26 and
Class 27), the tests targeting the air quality within the engine room. These tests revealed the location of the grilles on the Derby build allowed for much more debris to reach the filters (especially the lower ones), clogging them quicker, leading to poorer air quality within the engine compartment, and so potentially affecting performance and engine wear. With such a large order to be completed it was felt that a redesign of these areas would have cost savings in the long run, in addition to a better working environment within the cabs, and with a general less cluttered look about the locomotive's exterior. Some class 25/2s were built at Darlington works, including D7597 (later 25247) which was the last locomotive to be built at Darlington. The 25/2s built at Darlington had the original bodywork, not the restyled design. There were six variants of this sub-class, reflecting that locos were boilered and/or vacuum braked and/or
dual braked. Boiler fitted locomotives included the first five (252 AV) and final thirty Class 25/2 (252 DV). Only members of the latter batch were modified for dual brake operation becoming 252 CX with the exception of 25242 that had had its boiler removed and was designated 252 FX. The non-boilered vacuum braked locos were 252 BV and when dual braked became 252 EX.
Class 25/3 :
Number sequence (original) D7598–D7677 (TOPS) 25 248–25 327 in 1982. The final batch of locomotives were designated
Class 25/3 and was to be built by BR's Derby Works and
Beyer, Peacock and Company of
Manchester. However, because of financial problems Beyer, Peacock was unable to complete the final 18 locomotives and these were transferred to BR Derby for construction. Though these locomotives still carried a RTB 15656 generator, this variant was a ten pole machine with a modified assembly incompatible with earlier equipment. The regulated (full hp) part of its characteristic was substantially the same as before but the unloading point, that is the point at which full power could no longer be utilised, was altered to 900 A, 910 V (819 kW) from 1,050 A, 780 V (819 kW). Only two stages of
field weakening were employed, previous machines had six, and this provided ‘full power' at speeds between 7 and , and maximum tractive effort was reduced to . The latter half of the 1960s had seen the widespread introduction of solid state electronics and these locomotives incorporated a control system where speed was detected electronically rather than mechanically. A signal from a tachogenerator was used to close contactors in sequence at given speeds to activate the motor's field weakening process, rather than through contacts and relays as in earlier types. The control system ensured the traction motors and main generator were all operated within the continuous rating of the machines except in full field conditions when the driver was able to judge how long to remain in the short-term rating condition. There were two variants of the Class 25/3 sub-class. Early 25/3 AV locomotives were fitted with
vacuum brakes and in due course many of these were dual braked and redesignated 25/3 BX. By the time the last few locomotives were under construction dual braking had become the norm and ten of the last batch from Derby were built new as 25/3 BX locomotives for work out of
Willesden on the recently upgraded
West Coast Main Line.
Class 25/9 At the end of 1985 twelve of the remaining Class 25/3 locomotives were designated as 25/9, the intention being that they would operate on traffic won for the Industrial Minerals Division of
Railfreight that included
salt for road gritting from the
ICI mine at
Winsford. The locos were selected from the available pool of Class 25 locomotives in March 1985 with the expectation of three more years of service before 10,000 running hours since last Works attention would be reached and their maintenance would be concentrated at
Carlisle Kingmoor TMD. At that point the expected cascade of motive power on BR as a whole would see them replaced by
Class 31 locomotives. However, the traffic they were designated for was not captured and in due course the sub-class were withdrawn along with the other members.
Train Heating Units Three Class 25/3 locomotives were converted in 1983 at
Aberdeen Ferryhill Depot for use as mobile generators to provide electric heating on trains where the hauling locomotive could not supply this. As part of the modifications the traction motors were removed and ETH sockets fitted. The engine was set to run at 640 rpm when providing heat, compared with the idle speed of 325 rpm, and the full engine speed on a non-modified Class 25 of 750 rpm. They were given departmental numbers 97250 / 97251 / 97252 (formerly 25310 / 25305 / 25314). They were referred to as ETHEL units (Electric Train Heating Ex-Locomotives), and unofficially named Ethel 1, Ethel 2 and Ethel 3. They were painted in a blue/grey livery in an effort to match the coaching stock livery of the day. After use in Scotland, two of the units (Ethel 2 and Ethel 3) moved to London for heating stock hauled by main line steam locomotives, and two were painted in the then current InterCity Executive livery (nicknamed 'raspberry ripple') to match BR's Special Trains Unit's Mk1 coaches. Ethel 1 was withdrawn in 1987, the other two in 1990. All three were scrapped in 1994.
Prototype In 1962 Sulzer designed and began development of a prototype diesel engine for higher outputs based on the LDA range. Rated initially at at 850 rpm (with a development potential to at 850 rpm) it was approximately the same overall size as the 6LDA28 and designated LDA28-R. BR was approached with the idea that one of the Derby Type 2s should be fitted with this engine but development work proceeded slowly and problems with the 12LDA28-C (used on the Class 47 locomotive) diverted resources. In the end development was terminated and the locomotive set aside for its use, D5299, was completed as a standard Class 25/2. ==Operation==