On returning to London, he took a position as a military correspondent with the
Morning Post (1902–1904), and
The Times (1904–1918). His reports as a
war correspondent from the scene of the
Russo-Japanese War in 1904–1905 were later published as a book entitled
The War in the Far East. Repington was an advocate of the creation of a larger British Army (at the expense of the then all-powerful, in Edwardian England,
Royal Navy), which brought him into conflict with Admiral
Fisher). He supported the creation of a British Army General Staff pre-World War I, feared a German "bolt from the blue" (i.e. an attack upon the
British Isles by the
German Empire before a declaration of hostilities), and was a "Westerner" (i.e., supported during the war the defeat of the German Empire by heavy fighting on the
Western Front rather than pursuing an alternative indirect strategy). According to his memoir
Vestigia, an unnamed Radical paper once called him "the gorgeous Wreckington", but this was a personal attack in reference to his divorce scandal. During
World War I Repington relied on his personal contacts in the British Army and the
War Office for his information, and his early reporting of the war acquired important material from his personal friendship with the first Commander-in-Chief of the
British Expeditionary Force, Sir
John French, via which he was able to visit the
Western Front during the opening moves of the conflict in late 1914, at a time when most of his rival journalists were prohibited by the British Government from going to the war front. Repington appears to be the first person to have used the term
"First World War" on 10 September 1918 in a conversation noted in his diary, hoping that title would serve as a reminder and warning that the
Second World War was a possibility in the future.
"Shells Scandal" In May 1915, Repington personally witnessed the failed British attack at
Aubers Ridge in
Artois, and was particularly moved by the casualties sustained by his old Corps the Rifle Brigade in the action. He dispatched a telegram to
The Times blaming a lack of artillery ammunition available for the
British Expeditionary Force, which, despite being heavily censored, was printed after Sir John French's aide
Brinsley Fitzgerald assured him of French's tacit approval. Repington later emphatically denied that French had spoken to him on the issue, but French had in fact supplied Repington with information for the story. The appearance of this story in
The Times and later in the
Daily Mail, resulted in a
political scandal which contributed to the creation of a separate
Ministry of Munitions under the future Prime Minister
David Lloyd George, and a reduction in the power of the
War Secretary Lord Kitchener. Such blatant meddling in politics also damaged the authority of Sir John French as Commander-in-Chief of the B.E.F. and contributed to his enforced resignation from the post at the end of 1915. The affair had given Repington substantial influence over military policy via his newspaper reports, but he was personally temporarily prohibited from visiting the Western Front again until March 1916.
Prosecution under the Defence of the Realm Act He resigned from
The Times in January 1918 due to a disagreement with its proprietor,
Lord Northcliffe, who after the German counterattack at the
Battle of Cambrai had distanced himself from Field Marshal
Douglas Haig's conduct of the war, and required journalists in his employ to do the same. Repington, unwilling to go along with this editorial policy returned to
The Morning Post. On 16 February 1918, as part of the power struggle between Lloyd George (
Prime Minister since December 1916) and the Chief of the Imperial General Staff, General
Robertson, Repington along with the ''Morning Post's'' editor
Howell Arthur Gwynne appeared at
Bow Street Magistrates' Court charged with having contravened
DORA Regulation 18 by publishing articles (on 11 February 1918) disclosing Lloyd George's attempts to bypass Robertson by setting up
a rival staff under
Henry Wilson at
Versailles; Lloyd George's plans to re-focus British military effort away from the Western Front towards defeating the
Ottoman Empire, and the Government's failure to keep the British Army on the Western Front up to required troop strength for offensive operations. Repington claimed that the crowd in attendance was the largest since the trial of
Dr Crippen, and later claimed that Robertson had told him that he could no more afford to be seen with him than either of them "could afford to be seen walking down Regent Street with a whore". Repington was found guilty and was fined. Repington was also a casualty of the
Maurice Debate. On 12 May a two-page editorial in
The Observer (written by the editor
J. L. Garvin at the behest of the owner
Waldorf Astor) attacked him and his reputation never fully recovered. ==Later life==