Russian historian
Pavel Polian considered all of the deportations of entire ethnic groups which occurred during Stalin's rule a
crime against humanity. He concluded that the real reason for the deportation was Stalin's policy of "frontier cleansing" the western and eastern regions of the USSR. Kazakhstani Korean scholar
German Kim assumes that one of the reasons for this deportation may have been Stalin's intent to oppress ethnic minorities that could have posed a threat to his socialist system or he may have intended to consolidate the border regions with
China and Japan by using them as political bargaining chips. Additionally, Kim points out that 1.7 million people perished in the
Kazakh famine of 1931–33, while an additional one million people fled from the Republic, causing a labour shortage in that area, which Stalin sought to compensate for by deporting other ethnicities there. Historian Jon K. Chang wrote that the Soviet deportations of Koreans (and other diaspora, deported peoples such as Germans, Finns, Greeks and many others) illustrated the fact that
Russian nationalism, and essentialized views of
race, that is,
primordialism were both wholly carried over from the
Tsarist era. These Soviet tropes and biases were transformed into a decidedly, un-Marxist Soviet "
yellow peril" which the Koreans (and the Chinese) symbolized. The prevalence of racism lay in the fact that (Slavs, some Jews,
Armenians and members of other ethnic groups) could be wholly or individually judged based on what class they belonged to but the Koreans could not. The Koreans could not pass as Slavs (such as Bronstein "passing" as Trotsky) without intermarrying. Scholar Vera Tolz from the
University of Manchester considered this deportation of Korean civilians an example of a
racist policy in the USSR. Terry Martin, a professor of Russian studies, categorized this event as an act of
ethnic cleansing without an ethnic bias. Alexander Kim, Associate Professor at the Primorye State Agricultural Academy, agrees and according to his assessment, the Soviet Koreans were the first victims of ethnic repression and
persecution in the Soviet Union, a violation of the state pledge of the equality of all people. Farid Shafiyev, chairman of the
Baku-based Center of Analysis of International Relations, assumes that the Soviet policy has always been the
Russification of border regions, especially the Asian peripheries.
Historiography Modern historians and scholars consider this deportation an example of a racist policy which existed in the USSR and they also consider it an act of ethnic cleansing. Nonetheless, the dominant view among historians of Russia and the USSR was and remains that of Harvard's Terry Martin and his theory of "
Soviet xenophobia". This theory is based on the belief that the Soviet Union ethnically cleansed the border peoples of the USSR from 1937 to 1951 (including the peoples of the Caucasus and the peoples of the Crimea) in order to remove Soviet nationalities whose political allegiances were allegedly suspect or
inimical to Soviet socialism. In this view, the USSR did not practice direct negative ethnic animus or discrimination ("In neither case did the Soviet state itself conceive of these deportations as ethnic."). Political ideology of all Soviet peoples was the primary consideration. Martin stated that the various deportations of the Soviet border peoples were simply the "culmination of a gradual shift from predominantly class-based terror" which began during collectivization (1932–33) to "national/ethnic" based terror (1937). Accordingly, Martin also claimed that the
deportations of the nationalities were "ideological, not ethnic. They were spurred by an ideological hatred and a suspicion of foreign capitalist governments, not by national hatred of non-Russians." His theory entitled "Soviet xenophobia" paints the USSR and the Stalinist regime as having practiced and carried out in politics, education and Soviet society relatively pure socialism and Marxist practices. This view has been supported by several of the major historians of the USSR, those in Russian and even Korean studies. Alyssa Park, in her archival work, found very little evidence that Koreans had proven or were able to prove their loyalties beyond a shadow of a doubt, thus 'necessitating' deportation from the border areas. In contrast, the views of
J. Otto Pohl and Jon K. Chang affirm the belief that the Soviet Union, its officials and everyday citizens produced and carried over (from the Tsarist era)
racialized (primordialist) views, policies and tropes regarding their non-Slavic peoples.
Norman M. Naimark believed that the Stalinist "nationalities deportations" were forms of national-
cultural genocide. At the very least, the deportations changed the cultures, ways of life and world views of the deported peoples because the majority of them were sent to Soviet Central Asia and Siberia. "Primordialism" is simply another way of saying ethnic
chauvinism or racism because the said "primordial" peoples or ethnic groups are seen as possessing "permanent" traits and characteristics, which they pass on from one generation to the next. Chang and Martin both believe that the Stalinist regime took a turn towards primordializing nationality in the 1930s. After the "primordialist turn" by the Stalinist regime in the mid-1930s, the
Soviet Greeks,
Finns,
Poles, Chinese, Koreans,
Germans,
Crimean Tatars and other deported peoples were all seen as being loyal to their "titular" nations (or they were seen as being loyal to non-Soviet polities) because in the 1930s, the Soviet state considered nationality (ethnicity) and political loyalty (ideology) primordial equivalents. Thus, it was not a surprise when the regime resorted to "deportation". In Martin's view, the Soviet regime was not deporting the various diaspora peoples because of their nationality. Rather, nationality (ethnicity or phenotype) served as a referent or a signifier for the political ideology of the deported peoples. Amir Weiner's argument is similar to Martin's argument, substituting "territorial identity" for "xenophobia". The "Soviet xenophobia" argument also does not hold up semantically. Xenophobia is the fear of invasion or loss of territory and influence to foreigners by natives. The "Russians" and other Eastern Slavs are coming into the territory of the natives (the deported peoples) who were simply Soviet national minorities. They were not foreign elements. The Russian empire was not the "native" state, polity or government in the Russian Far East, the Caucasus and many other regions of the deported peoples.
Koguryo followed by
Parhae/Balhae/Bohai were the first states of the Russian Far East. John J. Stephan called the "erasure" of Chinese and Korean history (state-formation, cultural contributions, peoples) to the region by the USSR and Russia the intentional "genesis of a 'blank spot. All of the Stalinist orders for the "total deportation" of the thirteen nationalities (from 1937 to 1951) list each of the peoples by ethnicity as well as by a charge of treason. Soviet law required that one's guilt or innocence (for treason) should be determined individually and it should also be determined in a court of law prior to sentencing (per the 1936 Constitution). Finally, on the other end of the "primordial" spectrum, the Eastern Slavs (Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians) were inherently seen as being more loyal and more representative of the Soviet people. According to Chang, this is a deviation from socialism and Marxist–Leninism. ==Relationship with contemporary South Korea==