MarketDying Gaul
Company Profile

Dying Gaul

The Dying Gaul, also called The Dying Galatian or The Dying Gladiator, is an ancient Roman marble semi-recumbent statue now in the Capitoline Museums in Rome. It is a copy of a now lost Greek sculpture from the Hellenistic period thought to have been made in bronze. The original may have been commissioned at some time between 230 and 220 BC by Attalus I of Pergamon to celebrate his victory over the Galatians, the Celtic or Gaulish people of parts of Anatolia. The original sculptor is believed to have been Epigonus, a court sculptor of the Attalid dynasty of Pergamon.

History
The Dying Gaul was first recorded in a 1623 inventory of the collections of the Ludovisi family. The 16th-century Ludovisi inventories do not mention the so-called Ludovisi barbarians, thus it is likely that the Ludovisi acquired them early in the 17th century, during excavations for the building of the Villa Ludovisi commissioned by Cardinal Ludovico Ludovisi on the site of the Roman Gardens of Sallust (). It is very likely that the barbarian figures came from these gardens. When the first inventory was made, the Ludovisi antiquities had already been restored, apparently by the sculptor Ippolito Buzzi in 1623 with the assistance of the young sculptor and painter, Gian Lorenzo Bernini. Those restorations that are not Bernini's are believed to be Buzzi's according to Miranda Marvin, an archaeologist and a scholar of art and classics. In 1670, Giambattista Ludovisi considered selling the Dying Gladiator (Gladiatore morente), as it was known then, valuing it at 70,000 scudi, almost twice as much as the value of any other single figure in his collection. The sculpture was displayed in the Palazzo Grande of the Villa Ludovisi until it was seized in about 1688–1689 by Livio Odescalchi, the Duke of Bracciano, as payment of a debt, returned, and again seized by Odescalchi in 1695. It was finally returned to the last surviving Ludovisi, Ippolita Boncompagni, in 1715 or 1716. In the early 1730s Pope Clement XII (ruled 1730–1740) gave large sums of money to the Marquis Capponi to acquire ancient Roman sculpture and other antiquities, thereby establishing the Capitoline Museum. Capponi, its first director, soon began adding more objects to its collections. Upon the death of Ippolita Ludovisi in December 1733, he began negotiations with the legal representative of her heirs, Cardinal Troiano Acquaviva, for the acquisition of the Dying Gladiator. The sculptor Agostino Cornacchini set the starting price at 12,000 scudi, but this amount was subsequently reduced to 6,000 scudi. It was later taken by Napoleon's forces in 1797 under the terms of the Treaty of Tolentino, and reached Paris in the triumphal procession of July 1798 celebrating Bonaparte's Italian campaign, following which it was displayed with other Italian works of art in the Musée Central des Arts with its inauguration on 9 November 1800. The statue remained in Paris until October 1815 when it was repatriated following the intervention of the sculptor Antonio Canova (1757-1822). It arrived at Rome in the first half of 1816, and was returned to the Capitoline Museum later that year. Marvin has reviewed the historiographic scholarship on the Ludovisi barbarians, long believed to be marble copies of the bronze originals from Attalid Pergamon. She concludes that arguments for their being mere copies of the presumed second-century B.C. Pergamene originals are "deeply flawed" regarding the identity of their subjects, details about their context, reconstruction, and date. Marvin advances the hypothesis, rather, that the sculptures are second century A.D. Roman creations in the grand manner associated with the art of Hellenistic Pergamon, which was widely emulated around the Mediterranean in both Hellenistic and Roman times. This view is rejected by Massimiliano Papini, a specialist in Greek and Roman sculpture, who dismisses as "improbable" the "attempts to attribute the original bronzes of defeated Gauls reflected in the large-scale copies to Attalos I's terrace at Delphi, and even more the interpretation of the marble pieces as Roman works evoking Pergamon 'in the grand manner'". Restoration and conservation Emma Payne cites research by the conservator Giovanna Martellotti and her colleagues suggesting that years after Ippolito Buzzi's comparitively light-touch restoration, the Dying Gaul underwent a major restoration, possibly as a result of the earlier composition suffering breakage, specifically the right arm. The researchers believe that in the original Roman composition and in the Buzzi restoration, the arm was positioned closer to the body and at a steeper angle, as if the man were falling to the ground. In the academic literature, the newer restoration has been observed for many years to be incorrect. Martellotti says the Dying Gaul is generally believed to be a 2nd-century A.D. Roman copy of a Hellenistic work dating from the end of the 3rd century or the beginning of the 2nd century B.C. When first excavated, it was found broken into several pieces, and had experienced other significant damage. In a paper delivered to a symposium held at the J. Paul Getty Museum in 2001, Martellotti summarizes the statue's careful restoration, including the extensive reconstruction ascribed to the Lombard sculptor Ippolito Buzzi, who worked from 1621 to 1625 on restoring the Ludovisi collection: Almost all the originally long locks of the Dying Gaul's hair have been broken over the years, and its appearance today is a result of the remaining stubs having been reworked. From December 12, 2013, until March 16, 2014, the work was on display in the main rotunda of the west wing of the National Gallery of Art in Washington D.C. This temporary tenure marked the first time the statue had left Italy since it was returned in the second decade of the 19th century. ==Provenance==
Provenance
According to Attanasio et al, their provenance analysis proves that the marble used in the Dying Gaul is white Docimian marble. These marbles are extremely difficult to distinguish from Göktepe white marbles visually, some of which are also analytically very similar to the Docimian marbles, especially those Göktepe marbles originating from the so-called district 4 quarries. The researchers report that the results of their strontium analysis in comparing marble samples from Göktepe with the statues of the Ludovisi Gauls indicated "uncommonly high" strontium levels in Göktepe marbles, and much lower levels in those from Docimium, ruling out any possible provenance from the Göktepe quarries. They say mathematical analysis of their data confirms that the Dying Gaul is made of white Docimian marble originating from Afyon, probably from one of the Roman imperial quarries. ==Portrayal of Celts==
Portrayal of Celts
. The statue serves both as a reminder of the Celts' defeat, thus demonstrating the might of the people who defeated them, and a memorial to their bravery as worthy adversaries. The statue may also provide evidence to corroborate ancient accounts of the fighting style—Diodorus Siculus reported that "Some of them have iron breastplates or chainmail while others fight naked". Polybius wrote an evocative account of Galatian tactics against a Roman army at the Battle of Telamon of 225 BC: The Roman historian Livy recorded that the Celts of Asia Minor fought naked and their wounds were plain to see on the whiteness of their bodies. The Greek historian Dionysius of Halicarnassus regarded this as a foolish tactic: The depiction of this particular Galatian as naked may also have been intended to lend him the dignity of heroic nudity or pathetic nudity. It was not infrequent for Greek warriors to be likewise depicted as heroic nudes, as exemplified by the pedimental sculptures of the Temple of Aphaea at Aegina. The message conveyed by the sculpture, as H. W. Janson comments, is that "They knew how to die, barbarians though they were". ==Influence==
Influence
The Dying Galatian became one of the most celebrated works to have survived from antiquity and was first engraved by François Perrier in his work Segmenta nobilium signorum et statuarum que temporis dentem invidium evase (Rome and Paris 1638, plate 91). The artistic quality and expressive pathos of the statue aroused great admiration among the educated classes in the 17th and 18th centuries and was a "must-see" sight on the Grand Tour of Europe undertaken by young men of the day. Byron was one such visitor, commemorating the statue in his poem ''Childe Harold's Pilgrimage'': ==Reproductions and copies==
Reproductions and copies
According to the art historian Francis Haskell, an engraving of the Dying Gladiator was published in François Perrier's 1638 folio of engravings of Rome's "finest sculptures", marking the first of innumerable times it has been reproduced. The first known copy is the plaster cast made for Philip IV of Spain in 1650. Another cast was made for the French Academy in Rome, and no later than 1684 Michel Monnier in Rome carved a marble copy for Louis XIV that was sent to France, where it remains at Versailles. In 1743 Peter Scheemakers sculpted a version in stone for the garden at Rousham House in Oxfordshire—his rendering was judged by Haskell to be badly done. Haskell and Nicholas Penny say that the diarist John Evelyn travelled in Italy during the years 1644–1645 and when writing up his travel notes many years later, claimed that copies and statues made by artists following the Dying Gladiator were dispersed throughout all of Europe. Small bronzes were made in the 17th and 18th centuries, and Thomas Jefferson wanted a copy of the Gladiator for his proposed library at Monticello. In 1776, the body of a hanged smuggler who had been dissected by the anatomist William Hunter for the Royal Academy of Arts teaching schools was cast by Agostino Carlini in the same pose as that of the Dying Gladiator. == References ==
tickerdossier.comtickerdossier.substack.com