File:William de Brailes - The Fall of the Rebel Angels (Apocryphal) - Walters W10624R - Full Page.jpg|The Fall of the Rebel Angels (Apocryphal) (), by
William de Brailes.
God sits on a throne within a
mandorla. The rebelling angels are depicted as falling out of heaven and into a hell, in the shape of a mouth. As they fall, the angels become demons. File:Paradise Lost 1.jpg|Michael casts out rebel angels. Illustration by
Gustave Doré for
John Milton's
Paradise Lost (1866) File:Paradise_Lost_24.jpg|Angels fighting against fallen angels during the
War in Heaven. Illustration by Gustave Doré for John Milton's
Paradise Lost (1866)
Bible .
Brooklyn Museum,
New York City Luke 10:18 refers to "
Satan falling from heaven" and Matthew 25:41 mentions "
the Devil and his angels", who will be thrown into
Hell. All
Synoptic Gospels identify Satan as the leader of demons.
Paul the Apostle ( or 67) states in 1 Corinthians 6:3 that there are angels who will be judged, implying the existence of wicked angels. The
Book of Revelation, chapter 12, speaks of Satan as the "Great Red Dragon" whose "tail swept a third part of the stars of heaven and cast them to the earth". In verses 7–9, Satan is defeated in the
War in Heaven against
Michael and his angels: "the great dragon was thrown down, that
ancient serpent who is called
the Devil and
Satan, the deceiver of the whole world—he was thrown down to the earth and his angels were thrown down with him". Nowhere within the
New Testament are fallen angels identified with
demons, The
First Epistle to the Corinthians in 11:10, according to the early Church Father
Tertullian, references fallen angels; Tertullian taught that protection from the lust of the fallen angels was the reason for the
Apostle Paul's
directive to Christian women to wear a headcovering (veil). Tertullian referenced a woman who was touched on the neck by a fallen angel "who found her to be a temptation".
Origen and other early Christian writers linked the fallen morning star of
Isaiah 14:12 of the
Old Testament to Jesus' statement in Luke 10:18 that he "saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven", as well as a passage about the fall of Satan in Revelation 12:8–9. The Latin word
lucifer, as introduced in the late 4th-century AD
Vulgate, gave rise to the name for a fallen angel. Christian tradition has associated Satan not only with the image of the fallen "morning star" in Isaiah 14:12, but also with the denouncing in Ezekiel 28:11–19 of the
King of Tyre, who is spoken of as having been a "
cherub". The
Church Fathers saw these two passages as in some ways parallel, an interpretation also testified in apocryphal and
pseudepigraphic works. However, "no modern evangelical commentary on Isaiah or Ezekiel sees Isaiah 14 or Ezekiel 28 as providing information about the fall of Satan".
Early Christianity During the period immediately before the
rise of Christianity, the intercourse between the Watchers and human women was often seen as the first fall of the angels. Christianity stuck to the Enochian writings at least until the third century. accepted the association of the angelic descent to the sons of God passage in Genesis 6:1–4. rejected this interpretation. According to the
Church Fathers who rejected the doctrine by Origen, these angels were guilty of having transgressed the limits of their nature and of desiring to leave their heavenly abode to experience sensual experiences. Irenaeus referred to fallen angels as
apostates, who will be punished by an everlasting fire. Justin Martyr () identified pagan deities as fallen angels or their demonic offspring in disguise. Justin also held them responsible for Christian persecution during the first centuries.
Tertullian and Origen also referred to fallen angels as teachers of
astrology. The Babylonian king, who is described as a fallen "morning star" in Isaiah 14:1–17, was probably the first time identified with a fallen angel by Origen. This description was interpreted typologically both as an angel and a human king. The image of the fallen morning star or angel was thereby applied to Satan by early Christian writers, following the equation of Lucifer to Satan in the pre-Christian century.
Roman Catholicism (-1616), by
Matthias Grünewald. Concert of Angels (detail), with
Lucifer in
feather costume and fallen angels in the background. ,
South Tyrol. The subject of fallen angels is covered in a number of
catechisms of the
Roman Catholic Church, including
Rev. George Hay's in which he answers the question
What was the sin by which they fell?: "It was pride, arising from the great beauty and sublime graces which God had bestowed upon them. For, seeing themselves such glorious beings, they fell in love with themselves, and, forgetting the God that made them, wished to be on an equality with their Creator." The consequence of this fall being that, "they were immediately deprived of all their supernatural graces and heavenly beauty: they were changed from glorious angels into hideous devils; they were banished out of heaven, and condemned to the torments of hell, which was prepared to receive them." In terms of the history of fallen angel theology it is thought to be rooted in Enochian literature, which Christians began to reject by the 3rd century. The sons of God came to be identified merely with righteous men, more precisely with descendants of
Seth who had been seduced by women descended from
Cain. The cause of evil was shifted from the
superior powers of angels, to humans themselves, and to the very beginning of history; the expulsion of Satan and his angels on the one hand and the original sin of humans on the other hand. However, the Book of Watchers, which identified the sons of God with fallen angels, was not rejected by
Syriac Christians or the
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church.
Augustine of Hippo's work
Civitas Dei (5th century) became the major opinion of
Western demonology and for the
Catholic Church. He rejected the Enochian writings and stated that the sole origin of fallen angels was the rebellion of Satan. As a result, fallen angels came to be equated with demons and depicted as non-sexual spiritual entities. The exact nature of their spiritual bodies became another topic of dispute during the Middle Ages. However, these angels received their ethereal body only after their fall. But even those who believed the fallen angels had ethereal bodies did not believe that they could produce any offspring. Augustine, in his
Civitas Dei describes two cities (
Civitates) distinct from each other and opposed to each other like light and darkness. The
earthly city is caused by the act of rebellion of the fallen angels and is inhabited by wicked men and demons (fallen angels) led by Satan. On the other hand, the
heavenly city is inhabited by righteous men and the angels led by God. Accordingly, the inhabitants of the earthly city can only operate within their God-given framework. In Augustine's view of angels, they cannot be guilty of carnal desires since they lack flesh, but they can be guilty of sins that are rooted in spirit and intellect such as
pride and
envy. However, after they have made their decision to rebel against God, they cannot turn back. The
Catechism of the Catholic Church understands the fall of angels as radical and irrevocable rejection of God and his reign by some angels who, though created as good beings,
freely chose evil, their sin being unforgivable because of the irrevocable character of their choice, not because of any defect in infinite divine mercy. Present-day Catholicism rejects
Apocatastasis, the reconciliation with God suggested by the Church Father Origen.
Orthodox Christianity Eastern Orthodox Christianity Like Roman Catholicism,
Eastern Orthodox Christianity shares the basic belief in fallen angels as spiritual beings who rebel against God. Unlike Roman Catholicism, however, there is no established doctrine about the exact nature of fallen angels, but Eastern Orthodox Christianity unanimously agrees that the power of fallen angels is always inferior to God. Therefore, belief in fallen angels can always be assimilated with local lore, as long it does not break basic principles and is in line with the Bible. Historically, some Eastern Orthodox theologians even tend to suggest that fallen angels
could be rehabilitated in the
world to come. Fallen angels, just like angels, play a significant role in the spiritual life of believers. As in Roman Catholicism, fallen angels are believed to
tempt and incite people into
sin, but
mental illness is also linked to the influence of fallen angels. Those who have reached an advanced degree of
spirituality are even thought to be able to envision them.
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Unlike most other Christian churches, the
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church accepts 1 Enoch and the
Book of Jubilees as canonical. As a result, the Church believes that human sin does not originate in Adam's transgression alone, but also from Satan and other fallen angels. Together with demons, they continue to cause sin and corruption on earth.
Protestantism (1847), by
Alexandre Cabanel, depicting
Lucifer. Like Roman Catholicism,
Protestantism continues with the concept of fallen angels as spiritual entities unrelated to flesh, Satan and his fallen angels are believed to be responsible for some misfortune in the world, but Luther always believed that the power of the good angels exceeds those of the fallen ones. The Italian Protestant theologian
Girolamo Zanchi (15161590) offered further explanations for the reason behind the fall of the angels. According to Zanchi, the angels rebelled when the
incarnation of Jesus Christ as the
Son of God was revealed to them in incomplete form. This contrasts with alternative views, such as
Manichaeism, proposing
absolute evil as an entirely separate ontological principle. With the proposition that there is only one ultimate principle, Christian philosophy threatened the hypothesis that God can only cause good and needed to explain the origins of moral evil. Thus, in
Western Christian philosophy the fall of angels served as a
thought experiment on how moral evil originates. Angels, as purely spiritual beings, were an example on how someone chooses evil despite optimal psychological and cognitive conditions. While according to many theories of
Ancient Greek philosophy hold an intellectualist account of morality (i.e. that evil derives from an impeded intellectual cognition) the sin of angels, who are purely spiritual beings, needed an alternative explanation. The voluntarist account asserts that angels sinned by their own volition. While the intellectualists need to explain how a spiritual being can suffer from cognitive deficiencies, voluntarists need to explain how beings under the same psychological conditions make different moral choices.
Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225 – 7 March 1274), following an intellectualist approach, argued that the mind cannot comprehend all thoughts at once. As such, angels only consider on whatever they focus on, but if they do not focus on the highest good, they commit evil actions.
Henry of Ghent (c. 1217 – 29 June 1293) asserts that evil volition must precede mistaken consideration. Defective reasoning is described as the result of evil will. In the discussion concerning
theodicy, the question of how evil can exist simultaneously with the existence of an all-powerful and all-good God, fallen angels are also proposed as an explanation for
natural evil. The theory proposes that fallen angels can influence nature and cause suffering through natural disasters. Combined with the free-will of angels, natural disasters too may result from evil volition.
Folklore In Christian folklore tales about encounters between men and spirits, the spirits were often explained as fallen angels. They would have been cast out of heaven, damned to roam the world as demons, but were not so evil that they were sentenced to hell, like Lucifer and his devils. Yet they were still not as good to remain in heaven. Therefore, they would live between heaven and hell among humans in liminal spaces.
Caesarius of Heisterbach's () asserted that not all fallen angels are equally bad. Some fallen angels would be banished for not actively defending God against Lucifer, but since they did not side with the devils, they would not be sentenced to hell. They remain loyal to God on earth, do good deeds, and bearing some resemblances to saints, as seen in the
Dialogus Miraculorum, in which a knight is guided by a fallen angel to lead him back on the path of piety. In another tale, a neutral fallen angel became an assistant of a noble knight. However, when the knight learned that his best assistant was actually a demon, he dismissed him. When the knight wants to pay the demon for his service, the demon asserted that the knight should spend the money on a new bell for the church, instead. If such fairies were identified with the Biblical fallen angels, their salvation after Judgement Day was usually denied, since the fallen angels could not return to heaven. Later
Protestant thinkers increasingly dismissed belief in fairies and neutral angels as part of either fairy-tales or a delusion cast by Satan. == Islam ==