Timeline Scholars debate the dating of Ezra’s mission due to textual emendations and lack of extrabiblical evidence, with proposed timelines placing his activity either during the reign of
Artaxerxes I or
Artaxerxes II, complicating the historical context and relationship with Nehemiah. The text does not specify whether the king in the passage refers to Artaxerxes I (465–424 BCE) or to
Artaxerxes II (404–359 BCE). Most scholars hold that Ezra lived during the rule of Artaxerxes I, though some have difficulties with this assumption: However, in Nehemiah 8, Nehemiah has Ezra read the Torah to the people. So, they clearly were contemporaries working together in Jerusalem at the time the wall and the city of Jerusalem were rebuilt in contrast to the previously stated viewpoint. There is a much clearer problem with the timeline in a story from Ezra 4, that tells of a letter that was sent to Artaxerxes asking to stop the rebuilding of the temple (which started during the reign of Cyrus and then restarted in the second year of Darius, in 521 BCE). Clearly no such letter could have been sent to Artaxerxes, as he only became king in 465 BCE, so apparently some events detailing the resistance of leaders of nearby peoples against the works of Nehemiah must have been confused with events during the days of Zerubbabel.
Historicity at Al-Uzayr near
Basra, Iraq There is no historical
consensus on Ezra’s existence or mission due to a lack of extrabiblical evidence and conflicting scholarly interpretations, ranging from viewing him as a historical
Aramean official to a literary figure, with debates hinging on the authenticity of the
Artaxerxes rescript and its dating. Gosta W. Ahlstrom argues the inconsistencies of the
biblical tradition are insufficient to say that Ezra, with his central position as the 'father of Judaism' in the Jewish tradition, has been a later literary invention. Those who argue against the historicity of Ezra argue that the presentation style of Ezra as a leader and lawgiver resembles that of Moses. There are also similarities between Ezra the priest-scribe (but not
high priest) and Nehemiah the secular governor on the one hand and
Joshua and
Zerubbabel on the other hand. The early 2nd-century BCE Jewish author
Ben Sira praises Nehemiah, but makes no mention of Ezra. It has been argued that even if one does not accept the
documentary hypothesis, Ezra was instrumental in the start of the process of bringing the Torah together. One particular aspect of Ezra's story considered dubious historically is the account in
Ezra 7 of his commission. According to it, Ezra was given truly exalted status by the king: he was seemingly put in charge of the entire western half of the
Persian Empire, a position apparently above even the level of the
satraps (regional governors). Ezra was given vast hoards of treasure to take with him to Jerusalem as well as a letter where the king seemingly acknowledges the sovereignty of the God of Israel. Yet, his actions in the story do not appear to be that of someone with near unlimited government power, and the alleged letter from a Persian king is written with
Hebraisms and Jewish idiom. Biblical scholar Tova Ganzel has recently argued that Ezra's status as both priest and scribe fits well in its
fifth century BCE historical context in light of parallels with the
Babylonian temple scribes of the
Neo-Babylonian and
Persian Periods. ==See also==