Ethnonym and etymology According to
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, the Etruscans called themselves
Rasenna (Greek Ῥασέννα), a stem from the Etruscan Rasna (𐌛𐌀𐌔𐌍𐌀): "the people". Evidence of inscriptions as Tular Rasnal (𐌕𐌖𐌋𐌀𐌛 𐌛𐌀𐌔𐌍𐌀𐌋), "boundary of the people", or Mechlum Rasnal (𐌌𐌄𐌙𐌋 𐌛𐌀𐌔𐌍𐌀𐌋), "community of the people", attest to its autonym usage. The
Tyrsenian etymology, however, remains unknown. In
Attic Greek, the Etruscans were known as
Tyrrhenians (,
Tyrrhēnoi, earlier
Tyrsēnoi), from which the Romans derived the names
Tyrrhēnī,
Tyrrhēnia (Etruria), and
Mare Tyrrhēnum (
Tyrrhenian Sea). The ancient Romans referred to the Etruscans as the
Tuscī or
Etruscī (singular
Tuscus). Their Roman name is the origin of the terms
Toscana, which refers to their heartland, and
Etruria, which can refer to their wider region. The term
Tusci is thought by linguists to have been the Umbrian word for Etruscan, based on an inscription on an
ancient bronze tablet from a nearby region. The inscription contains the phrase
turskum ... nomen, literally 'the Tuscan name'. Based on knowledge of
Umbrian grammar, linguists can infer that the base form of the word turskum is *Tursci, which would, through
metathesis and a word-initial
epenthesis, be likely to lead to the form,
E-trus-ci. As for the original meaning of the root, *Turs-, a widely cited hypothesis is that it, like the Latin
turris, it means 'tower' and comes from the ancient Greek word for tower: , likely a loan into Greek. In this hypothesis, the Tusci were called the 'people who build towers" This proposed etymology is made the more plausible because the Etruscans preferred to build their towns on high precipices reinforced by walls. Alternatively,
Giuliano and
Larissa Bonfante have speculated that Etruscan houses may have seemed like towers to the simple Latins. The proposed etymology has a long history, with
Dionysius of Halicarnassus having observed in the first century BC, "[T]here is no reason that the Greeks should not have called [the Etruscans] by this name, both from their living in towers and from the name of one of their rulers." In his recent
Etymological Dictionary of Greek, Robert Beekes claims the Greek word is a "loanword from a Mediterranean language", a hypothesis that goes back to an article by
Paul Kretschmer in
Glotta from 1934.
Origins Ancient sources , a painted by the Athenian
Exekias ca. 530 BCE, showing the narrative of Dionysus's capture by Tyrrhenian pirates and transfiguration of them into dolphins in the seventh
Homeric Hymn ,
Museo archeologico nazionale ,
Musée d'art et d'histoire de Genève pendant with a large equilateral cross of concentric circles flanked by four small right-facing
swastikas among its symbols from
Bolsena,
Italy, 700–650 BC.
Louvre Literary and historical texts in the Etruscan language have not survived, and the language itself is only partially understood by modern scholars. This makes modern understanding of their society and culture heavily dependent on much later and generally disapproving Roman and Greek sources. These ancient writers differed in their theories about the origin of the Etruscan people. Some suggested they were
Pelasgians who had migrated there from Greece, with others maintained that they were indigenous to central Italy. The first Greek author to mention the Etruscans, whom the Ancient Greeks called
Tyrrhenians, was the 8th-century BC poet
Hesiod in his work the
Theogony. He mentioned them as residing in central Italy alongside the Latins. The 7th-century BC
Homeric Hymn to Dionysus referred to them as pirates. Unlike later Greek authors, these authors did not suggest that Etruscans had migrated to Italy from the east and did not associate them with the Pelasgians. It was only in the 5th century BC, when the Etruscan civilization had been established for several centuries, that Greek writers started associating the name "Tyrrhenians" with the "Pelasgians", and even then some did so in a way that suggests they were meant only as generic, descriptive labels for "non-Greek" and "indigenous ancestors of Greeks" respectively. The 5th-century BC historians
Herodotus and
Thucydides, and the 1st-century BC historian
Strabo, did seem to suggest that the Tyrrhenians were originally Pelasgians who migrated to Italy from
Lydia by way of the Greek island of
Lemnos. They all described Lemnos as having been settled by Pelasgians, whom Thucydides identified as "belonging to the Tyrrhenians" (). As Strabo and Herodotus told it, the migration to Lemnos was led by
Tyrrhenus / Tyrsenos, the son of
Atys (who was king of Lydia). Strabo There is some evidence suggesting a link between Lemnos and the Tyrrhenians. The
Lemnos stele bears inscriptions in a language with strong structural resemblances to the language of the Etruscans. The discovery of these inscriptions in modern times has led to the suggestion of a "
Tyrrhenian language group" consisting of Etruscan, Lemnian, and the
Raetic spoken in the
Alps. Τhis is aligned with the famous and debated testimony of Herodotus: Herodotus also mentions the existence of a tribe called Tyrsenioi/Tyrrhenoi in Central Macedonia, "who were once neighbors of those now called
Dorians (for at that time the Pelasgians inhabited the land which is now called Thessaliotis)." By this Herodotus refers to Creston, a city/region in Macedonia. Additionally,
Thucydides claimed that to dwell in the
Athos Peninsula, also known as Acte. However, the 1st-century BC historian
Dionysius of Halicarnassus, a Greek living in Rome, dismissed many of the ancient theories of other Greek historians and postulated that the Etruscans were indigenous people who had always lived in Etruria and were different from both the Pelasgians and the Lydians. Dionysius noted that the 5th-century historian
Xanthus of Lydia, who was originally from
Sardis and was regarded as an important source and authority for the history of Lydia, never suggested a Lydian origin of the Etruscans and never named Tyrrhenus as a ruler of the Lydians. The first-century historian
Pliny the Elder also put the Etruscans in the context of the
Rhaetian people to the north, and wrote in his
Natural History (AD 79):
Archeological evidence and modern etruscology , one of the world's great archaeological finds, 2nd quarter of the 6th century BC ,
Museo Gregoriano Etrusco , Museo etrusco Guarnacci The question of the Etruscans' origins has long been a subject of interest and debate among historians. In modern times, all the evidence gathered by prehistoric and protohistoric archaeologists, anthropologists, and etruscologists points to an autochthonous origin of the Etruscans. In 2000, the etruscologist
Dominique Briquel explained in detail why he believes that ancient Greek narratives on Etruscan origins should not even count as historical documents. He argues that the ancient story of the Etruscans' 'Lydian origins' was a deliberate, politically motivated fabrication, and that ancient Greeks inferred a connection between the Tyrrhenians and the Pelasgians solely on the basis of certain Greek and local traditions and because there had been trade between the Etruscans and Greeks. He noted that, even if these stories include historical facts suggesting contact, such contact is more plausibly traceable to cultural exchange than to migration. Several archaeologists specializing in
Prehistory and
Protohistory who have analyzed Bronze Age and Iron Age remains that were excavated in the territory of historical Etruria have pointed out that no evidence has been found, related either to
material culture or to
social practices, to support a migration theory. The most marked and radical change that has been archaeologically attested in the area is the adoption, starting in about the 12th century BC, of the funeral rite of incineration in terracotta urns, a Continental European practice derived from the
Urnfield culture; nothing about it suggests an ethnic contribution from
Asia Minor or the
Near East. Based on this cultural continuity, there is now a consensus among archeologists that Proto-Etruscan culture developed, during the last phase of the Bronze Age, from the indigenous
Proto-Villanovan culture and that the subsequent Iron Age
Villanovan culture is most accurately described as an early phase of the Etruscan civilization. One of the most common mistakes for a long time, even among some scholars of the past, has been to associate the later
Orientalizing period of Etruscan civilization with the question of its origins. Orientalization was an artistic and cultural phenomenon that spread among the Greeks themselves and throughout much of the central and western Mediterranean, not only in Etruria. The Etruscan orientalizing period was due, as has been amply demonstrated by archeologists, to contacts with the Greeks and the Eastern Mediterranean and not to mass migrations. The facial features (the profile, almond-shaped eyes, large nose) in the frescoes and sculptures and the depiction of reddish-brown men and light-skinned women, influenced by archaic Greek art, followed the artistic traditions from the Eastern Mediterranean that had spread even among the Greeks themselves, and to a lesser extent also to several other civilizations in the central and western Mediterranean up to the
Iberian Peninsula. Actually, many of the tombs of the Late Orientalizing and Archaic periods, such as the
Tomb of the Augurs, the
Tomb of the Triclinium and the
Tomb of the Leopards, as well as other tombs from the archaic period in the
Monterozzi necropolis in
Tarquinia, were painted by Greek painters or at least foreign artists. These images have, therefore, a very limited value for a realistic representation of the Etruscan population. It was only from the end of the 4th century BC that evidence of physiognomic portraits began to be found in Etruscan art and Etruscan portraiture became more realistic.
Archeogenetics There have been numerous biological studies on the Etruscan origins, the oldest of which dates to the 1950s, when research was still based on blood tests of modern samples and DNA analysis (including the analysis of ancient samples) was not yet possible. Only very recently, with the development of
archaeogenetics, have comprehensive studies containing the
whole genome sequencing of Etruscan samples been published, including
autosomal DNA and
Y-DNA, autosomal DNA being the "most valuable to understand what really happened in an individual's history", as stated by geneticist
David Reich, whereas previously studies were based only on
mitochondrial DNA analysis, which contains less and limited information. An archeogenetic study focusing on Etruscan origins was published in September 2021 in the journal
Science Advances and analyzed the
autosomal DNA and the uniparental markers (Y-DNA and mtDNA) of 48 Iron Age individuals from
Tuscany and
Lazio, spanning from 800 to 1 BC and concluded that the Etruscans were autochthonous (locally indigenous) and had a genetic profile similar to their Latin neighbors. In the Etruscan individuals the ancestral component
Steppe was present in the same percentages as those found in the previously analyzed Iron Age Latins, and the Etruscan DNA bore no trace of recent admixture with Anatolia and the Eastern Mediterranean. Both Etruscans and Latins were firmly part of the European cluster, west of modern Italians. The Etruscans were a mixture of WHG, EEF and Steppe ancestry; 75% of the Etruscan male individuals were found to belong to
haplogroup R1b (R1b M269), especially its clade
R1b-P312 and its derivative
R1b-L2, whose direct ancestor is
R1b-U152, whilst the most common mitochondrial DNA haplogroup among the Etruscans was
H. The conclusions of the 2021 study are in line with a 2019 study published in the journal
Science that analyzed the remains of eleven
Iron Age individuals from the areas around Rome, of whom four were Etruscan, one buried in
Veio Grotta Gramiccia from the Villanovan era (900-800 BC) and three buried in La Mattonara Necropolis near
Civitavecchia from the Orientalizing period (700-600 BC). The study concluded that Etruscans (900–600 BC) and the
Latins (900–500 BC) from
Latium vetus were genetically similar, with genetic differences between the examined Etruscans and Latins found to be insignificant. The Etruscan individuals and contemporary Latins were distinguished from preceding populations of Italy by the presence of
steppe ancestry. Their DNA was a mixture of two-thirds
Copper Age ancestry (
EEF +
WHG; Etruscans ~66–72%, Latins ~62–75%) and one-third
Steppe-related ancestry (Etruscans ~27–33%, Latins ~24–37%). A couple of
mitochondrial DNA studies published in 2013 in the journals
PLOS One and
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, based on Etruscan samples from Tuscany and Latium, concluded that the Etruscans were an indigenous population, showing that Etruscan mtDNA appears to be very close to a Neolithic population from
Central Europe (
Germany,
Austria,
Hungary) and to other Tuscan populations, strongly suggesting that the Etruscan civilization developed locally from the
Villanovan culture, as supported by archaeological evidence and anthropological research, and that genetic links between Tuscany and western
Anatolia date to at least 5,000 years ago during the
Neolithic and the "most likely separation time between Tuscany and Western Anatolia falls around 7,600 years ago", at the time of the migrations of
Early European Farmers (EEF) from Anatolia to Europe in the early Neolithic. The ancient Etruscan samples had mitochondrial DNA haplogroups (mtDNA)
JT (subclades of
J and
T) and
U5, with a minority of
mtDNA H1b. An mtDNA study published in 2004, based on about 28 samples of individuals who lived from 600 to 100 BC in
Veneto, Etruria and Campania, found that the Etruscans had no significant heterogeneity and that all mitochondrial lineages observed among the Etruscan samples appear typically European or
West Asian but only a few
haplotypes were shared with modern populations. Allele sharing between the Etruscans and modern populations is highest among
Germans (seven haplotypes in common), the
Cornish from the South West of Britain (five haplotypes in common), the
Turks (four haplotypes in common) and the
Tuscans (two haplotypes in common). The modern populations with the shortest genetic distance from the ancient Etruscans, based solely on mtDNA and FST, were
Tuscans followed by the Turks, other populations from the Mediterranean and the Cornish after. and by archaeologists, who argued that the study was not clear-cut and had not provided evidence that the Etruscans were an intrusive population to the European context.
Periodization of Etruscan civilization The Etruscan civilization begins with the early Iron Age
Villanovan culture, regarded as the oldest phase, that occupied a large area of northern and central Italy during the Iron Age. The Villanovan culture emerges with the phenomenon of regionalization from the late Bronze Age culture called "
Proto-Villanovan", part of the central European
Urnfield culture system. In the last Villanovan phase, called the recent phase (about 770–730 BC), the Etruscans established relations of a certain consistency with the first
Greek immigrants in southern Italy (in
Pithecusa and then in
Cuma), so much so as to initially absorb techniques and figurative models and soon more properly cultural models, with the introduction, for example, of writing, of a new way of banqueting, of a heroic funerary ideology, that is, a new aristocratic way of life, such as to profoundly change the physiognomy of Etruscan society. Also directly Phoenician, or otherwise Near Eastern, craftsmen, merchants and artists contributed to the spread in southern Europe of Near Eastern cultural and artistic motifs. The last three phases of Etruscan civilization are called, respectively, Archaic, Classical, and Hellenistic, which roughly correspond to the homonymous phases of the ancient Greek civilization.
Chronology Expansion Etruscan expansion was concentrated both in the north, beyond the Apennines, and in Campania, although the Etruscan presence in the Emilia-Romagna area, according to archaeologists, was not due to a recent expansion but to a much older presence. However, it is thought that the political structure of the Etruscan culture was similar to, albeit more aristocratic than,
Magna Graecia in the south. The mining and commerce of metal, especially
copper and
iron, led to an enrichment of the Etruscans and to the expansion of their influence in the Italian peninsula and the western
Mediterranean Sea. Here, their interests collided with those of the Greeks, especially in the sixth century BC, when
Phocaeans of Italy founded colonies along the coast of
Sardinia,
Spain and
Corsica. This led the Etruscans to ally themselves with
Carthage, whose interests also collided with the Greeks. Around 540 BC, the
Battle of Alalia led to a new distribution of power in the western Mediterranean. Though the battle had no clear winner,
Carthage managed to expand its sphere of influence at the Greeks' expense, and Etruria saw itself relegated to the northern
Tyrrhenian Sea with full ownership of
Corsica. From the first half of the 5th century BC, the new political situation meant the beginning of the Etruscan decline after losing their southern provinces. In 480 BC, Etruria's ally Carthage was defeated by a coalition of Magna Graecia cities led by
Syracuse, Sicily. A few years later, in 474 BC, Syracuse's tyrant
Hiero defeated the Etruscans at the
Battle of Cumae. Etruria's influence over the cities of
Latium and Campania weakened, and the area was taken over by Romans and
Samnites. In the 4th century BC, Etruria saw a
Gallic invasion end its influence over the
Po Valley and the
Adriatic coast. Meanwhile,
Rome had started annexing Etruscan cities. This led to the loss of the northern Etruscan provinces. During the
Roman–Etruscan Wars, Etruria was conquered by Rome in the 3rd century BC. there was a period between 600 BC and 500 BC in which an alliance formed among 12 Etruscan settlements, known today as the
Etruscan League,
Etruscan Federation, or
Dodecapolis (). According to a legend, the Etruscan League of 12 cities was founded by
Tarchon and his brother
Tyrrhenus. Tarchon lent his name to the city of
Tarchna, or Tarquinnii, as it was known by the Romans. Tyrrhenus gave his name to the
Tyrrhenians, the alternative name for the Etruscans. Although there is no consensus on which cities were in the league, the following list may be close to the mark:
Arretium,
Caisra,
Clevsin,
Curtun,
Perusna,
Pupluna,
Veii,
Tarchna,
Vetluna,
Volterra,
Velzna, and
Velch. Some modern authors include
Rusellae. The league was mostly an economic and religious league, or a loose confederation, similar to the Greek states. During the later
imperial times, when Etruria was just one of many regions controlled by Rome, the number of cities in the league increased by three. This is noted on many gravestones from the 2nd century BC onwards. According to
Livy, the 12
city-states met once a year at the
Fanum Voltumnae at
Volsinii, where a leader was chosen to represent the league. There were two other Etruscan leagues ("
Lega dei popoli"): that of
Campania, the main city of which was
Capua, and the
Po Valley city-states in northern Italy, which included
Bologna,
Spina and
Adria. Rome was probably a small settlement until the arrival of the Etruscans, who constructed the first elements of its urban infrastructure such as the drainage system. The main criterion for deciding whether an object originated at Rome and traveled by influence to the Etruscans, or descended to the Romans from the Etruscans, is date. Many, if not most, of the Etruscan cities were older than Rome. If one finds that a given feature was there first, it cannot have originated at Rome. A second criterion is the opinion of the ancient sources. These would indicate that certain institutions and customs came directly from the Etruscans. Rome is located on the edge of what was Etruscan territory. When Etruscan settlements turned up south of the border, it was presumed that the Etruscans spread there after the foundation of Rome, but the settlements are now known to have preceded Rome. Etruscan settlements were frequently built on hills—the steeper the better—and surrounded by thick walls. According to
Roman mythology, when
Romulus and Remus founded Rome, they did so on the
Palatine Hill according to Etruscan ritual; that is, they began with a
pomerium or sacred ditch. Then they proceeded to the walls. Romulus was required to kill Remus when the latter jumped over the wall, breaking its magic spell (see also under
Pons Sublicius). The name of Rome is attested in Etruscan in the form
Ruma-χ meaning 'Roman', a form that mirrors other attested ethnonyms in that language with the same suffix
-χ:
Velzna-χ '(someone) from Volsinii' and
Sveama-χ '(someone) from
Sovana'. But this in itself does not prove Etruscan origin conclusively. If Tiberius is from
θefarie, then Ruma would have been placed on the
Thefar (
Tiber) river. A heavily discussed topic among scholars is who was the founding population of Rome. In 390 BC, the
city of Rome was attacked by the
Gauls, and as a result may have lost many, though not all, of its earlier records. Later history relates that some Etruscans lived in the
Vicus Tuscus, the "Etruscan quarter", and that there was an Etruscan line of kings (albeit ones descended from a Greek,
Demaratus of Corinth) that succeeded kings of Latin and Sabine origin. Etruscophile historians argue that this, together with evidence for institutions, religious elements and other cultural elements, proves that Rome was founded by Etruscans. Under Romulus and
Numa Pompilius, the people were said to have been divided into 30
curiae and three
tribes. Few Etruscan words entered
Latin, but the names of at least two of the tribes—
Ramnes and
Luceres—seem to be Etruscan. The last kings may have borne the Etruscan title
lucumo, while the
regalia were traditionally considered of Etruscan origin—the golden crown, the sceptre, the
toga palmata (a special robe), the
sella curulis (
curule chair), and above all the primary symbol of state power: the
fasces. The latter was a bundle of whipping rods surrounding a double-bladed axe, carried by the king's
lictors. An example of the fasces are the remains of bronze rods and the axe from a tomb in Etruscan
Vetulonia. This allowed archaeologists to identify the depiction of a fasces on the grave
stele of Avele Feluske, who is shown as a warrior wielding the fasces. The most telling Etruscan feature is the word
populus, which appears as an Etruscan deity,
Fufluns.
Roman families of Etruscan origin ==Society==