Oasis of the Zombies has received overwhelmingly negative reviews. In France, Pierre Gires of ''
L'Écran fantastique'' wrote that this "ultra cheap production, as poorly acted as it is photographed (and let's not even talk about the direction if you can call it that), tries to intrigue, then to scare, but only manages to bore." Writing in
Mad Movies, Jean-Pierre Putters wrote that he was not sure whether the film had indeed been directed by Franco due to Eurociné's liberal use of pseudonyms, but "some out of focus zooms definitely settled the question." He added that "[t]he film has been directed with modest means". Of the narrative, he wrote: "The screenplay... What screenplay?" However, he still found it less appalling than Eurociné's own
Cannibal Terror. British magazine
Video World noted that "[t]his boring, ineffectual Jess Franco clunker was also released as
Bloodsucking Nazi Zombies, but under any title it's a real stinker." Author Scott Aaron Stine concurred and noted that "the gore amounts to little more than smeared blood, although there is one obligatory gut-munching scene depicting desperate actors chewing on butcher shop leftovers." 1989's
The Deep Red Horror Book, a spinoff of the eponymous magazine, called it "the world's worst walking dead film."
Tim Lucas of
Video Watchdog deemed the film "slow, but much better than Eurociné's
Zombie Lake." Writing in
The Zombie Movie Encyclopedia, academic
Peter Dendle stated that "presents a simple, unhurried, and unpretending appreciation of zombies and their habitat, a fresh and provocative desert landscape." Ian Jane of
DVD Talk rated it 3 out of 5 and wrote, "It's terrible, but somehow trance inducing in its own bizarre way." Gordon Sullivan of
DVD Verdict wrote, "It's really a mess of tepid Eurosleaze masquerading as a zombie flick, and it doesn't even do that well."
Video Nasty listing Although largely devoid of graphic content,
Oasis of the Zombies was put on Section 3 of the
Director of Public Prosecutions's
Video Nasties list, which meant that, while not considered extreme enough to warrant a conviction in the English and Welsh
High Court of Justice, any copy could still be confiscated and destroyed by authorities. ==Follow-up==