In seventeenth-century Dutch,
Hottentot was at times used to denote all black people (synonymously with
Kaffir, which was at times likewise used for
Cape Coloureds and Khoisans), but at least some speakers used the term
Hottentot specifically for what they thought of as a
race distinct from the supposedly darker-skinned people referred to as
Kaffirs. This distinction between the non-Bantu "Cape Blacks" or "
Cape Coloureds" and the Bantu was noted as early as 1684 by the French anthropologist
François Bernier. The idea that
Hottentot referred strictly to the non-Bantu peoples of southern Africa was well embedded in colonial scholarly thought by the end of the eighteenth century. The main meaning of
Hottentot as an ethnic term in the 19th and the 20th centuries has therefore been to denote the Khoikhoi people specifically. However,
Hottentot also continued to be used through the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries in a wider sense, to include all of the people now usually referred to with the modern term
Khoisan (not only the Khoikhoi, but also the
San people, hunter-gatherer populations from the interior of southern Africa who had not been known to the seventeenth-century settlers, once often referred to as
Bosjesmannen in Dutch and
Bushmen in English). In
George Murdock's
Atlas of World Cultures (1981), the author refers to "Hottentots" as a "subfamily of the Khoisan linguistic family" who "became
detribalized in contact with Dutch settlers in 1652, mixing with the latter and with slaves brought by them from
Indonesia to form the hybrid population known today as the
Cape Coloured." The term
Hottentot remained in use as a technical ethnic term in anthropological and historiographical literature into the late 1980s. The 1996 edition of the
Dictionary of South African English merely says that "the word 'Hottentot' is seen by some as offensive and Khoikhoi is sometimes substituted as a name for the people, particularly in scholarly contexts". Yet, by the 1980s, because of the racist connotations discussed below, it was increasingly seen as too derogatory and offensive to be used in an ethnic sense. == Usage as a term of abuse and racist connotations ==