Critical response Varietys
Owen Gleiberman gave the film a positive review, writing, "Let's assume that, like me, you're not a
right-wing fundamentalist
conspiracy theorist looking for a dark, faith-based suspense film to see over the holiday weekend… Even then, you needn't hold extreme beliefs to experience
Sound of Freedom as a compelling movie that shines an authentic light on one of the crucial criminal horrors of our time, one that Hollywood has mostly shied away from due to the complicity of most senior executives in Hollywood being guilty of these crimes."
The Detroit News Adam Graham gave the film a C+ grade, writing "Even as the film's pacing starts to thud ... its work has been done, competently if not altogether artfully. Sometimes, obvious works just fine."
Film Threats Alan Ng recommended the film, writing, "
Sound of Freedom is almost as if you're listening to Tim Ballard tell his incredible story of rescuing children and having it dramatized onscreen. It's heartfelt, informative, and inspiring."
National Reviews Madeleine Kearns called the film "provocative and gripping," adding that it "remind[s] us that as long as children are being abused, no matter where they are or how many there are, the rest of us ought to care." Faith-based reviews were largely positive, while left-wing viewers criticized the film as having an unrealistic depiction of child sex trafficking, citing the young ages of the children kidnapped, the rarity of such kidnappings occurring, and kidnappings being done by those who the victims already know. The scene in which Ballard reunites a Honduran child with his father at an ICE office was also noted as being at odds with the real life separation of families by the agency that was occurring at the time of filming.
Glenn Kenny, writing for
The New York Times, stated "The queasiness derives from the contemporary-thriller vibes of the police procedural material... Then there are the scenes in which actual child actors perform being prepped for provocative pictures by adult groomers. What are the ethics of depiction here? The makers of this film initially seem to be grappling with how to properly tell this story." He went on to say "The director Alejandro Monteverde does have some sense of flourish, what with several single-point perspective shots and considered dissolves," but concluded "Oddly, the picture's muted tone ultimately undercuts its solemn sense of mission."
RogerEbert.coms Nick Allen was also negative, writing: "
Sound of Freedom is a solemn, drawn-out bore with a not particularly bold narrative stance—caring about the safety of children is roughly the easiest cause for any remotely decent human being... But while being so committed to such solemnity and suffering, the truncated storytelling by co-writers Monteverde and Rod Barr neglects to flesh out its ideas or characters or add any more intensity to Ballard's slow-slow-slow burn search for two kids in particular (Lucás Ávila's Miguel and Cristal Aparicio's Rocío) whose faces haunt him."
Slates Sam Adams said in his review that the film appears to be "a straightforward search-and-rescue thriller, in which Ballard, a special agent at the Department of Homeland Security, goes rogue to free a young girl from the clutches of a Colombian sex-trafficking ring. But it arrived in theaters surrounded by a cloud of innuendo put forth by its star and its noisiest right-wing supporters—conspiratorial insinuations about who doesn't want this story to be told and what real-world traffickers are
really up to."
The Times of Israels Shira Li Bartov wrote that the film draws upon multiple conspiracy theories that include
anti-Jewish canards, including the
blood libel, while its star, actor Jim Caviezel, has floated antisemitic theories in interviews promoting the film.
The Telegraphs Ed Power gave the "bizarrely dull" film one star out of five, calling it a "creepy and breathtakingly dreary child trafficking thriller" whose success in American theaters "proves America is not only a different country – it's a different planet".
Peter Bradshaw of
The Guardian also panned it as "an odd, uncertainly acted, opaquely intended movie," while Wendy Ide gave it two stars out of five in a review for its sister paper
The Observer, calling it both "an earnest and well-intentioned attempt to engage with a very real and harrowing issue" and "a thunderously crass and manipulative movie that is hampered by erratic pacing, pantomime bad guys and an overfondness for shots of Caviezel weeping God-fearing, manly tears."
Box office Sound of Freedom grossed in the United States and
Canada, and in other territories, for a worldwide total of . By late-August 2023, it was considered "one of history's most successful independent films." In March 2024,
Deadline Hollywood reported that of the film's box-office gross (at that point, ), 52% () went to "theater access costs", while 8% () was withheld by taxes, 19% () accounted for
print and advertising costs, 14% () served as payment to the filmmakers, and the remaining 7% () returned to Angel Studios. According to
/Film, the film received little coverage in the mainstream media leading up to its release. Originally,
Sound of Freedom was projected to gross over its first week of release, with some estimates reaching . The film grossed on its first day of release, on its second, and on its third, for a Tuesday—Thursday total of , raising six-day estimates to . It went on to make in its opening weekend (with a six day total of ), finishing third at the box office. Its success surprised many industry experts, especially considering it was only released in 2,850 theaters, considerably fewer than
Insidious: The Red Door (3,188 theaters) and
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny (4,600 theaters). Playing in 3,265 theaters in its second weekend, the film made (an increase of 26%), finishing second behind newcomer
Mission: Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part One.
Sound of Freedom crossed the mark at the box office on 16th day of release. In its third weekend the film made , finishing third behind newcomers
Barbie and
Oppenheimer. Playing in 3,411 theaters the film continued to hold well in its fourth weekend of release, grossing and finishing in fourth. After its opening week, rumors and videos on social media claimed that
AMC Theatres was canceling screenings and disrupting viewing by inventing technical difficulties and disabling air conditioning. Angel Studios' head of theatrical distribution Brandon Purdie said "these rumors are not accurate" and stated that due to the positive reception and consumer demand, AMC had added 450 additional theaters on July 14.
Audience reception and faith-based appeal The film, which various contemporary sources describe as a "Christian thriller", received highly positive reviews from viewers, at one point earning an audience score of 100% on
Rotten Tomatoes. Some movie industry analysts attributed the film's success in part to its appeal to an overlooked segment of the film audience. "This is yet another example of a faith-based distributor breaking the rules and coming out a winner," Comscore senior analyst Paul Dergarabedian said. "[It] also shows that a
grassroots marketing strategy and tapping into the power of the faith-based audience has proven to be a very effective method to generate profits."
Variety wrote that ticket buyers have been predominantly female, while more than 50% of cinemagoers were over the age of 45. The
National Post argued that the film was an example of an independent studio "beat[ing] Hollywood at its own game."
Endorsements and special screening Mel Gibson,
Dana White,
Elon Musk,
Ben Shapiro,
Jewel,
Manny Pacquiao,
Tim Tebow, and the
Family Research Council endorsed the film.
Donald Trump hosted a special screening at
Trump National Golf Club Bedminster on the night of July 19, 2023.
Accolades For his performance in the film,
Javier Godino won Best Actor in an International Production at the
32nd Actors and Actresses Union Awards. ==References==