Jurish (Samaria) ()
Jurish was long thought to be the birthplace of
Simon Bar-Giora, and the Jewish stronghold taken by the Romans under Lucius Annius, during Vespasian's military campaign to encircle Jerusalem and to make the people's escape into other regions more difficult. Those who supported this view were Shalem (1940),
Avi-Yonah (1976),
Yoram Tsafrir and co-editors (1994), and
Israel Finkelstein (1997), among others. Safrai (1980/81) and Zissu (2007) have argued, from the sequence of events, that the toparchy of
Akrabat (Acrabatenne) and the region adjoining thereto (i.e.
Jurish of Samaria) were subdued by the Romans about one year after Vespasian's forces completed the encirclement of Jerusalem and had erected citadels in Jericho and in
Adida, and had destroyed
Gerasa in Judea, based on the timeline of these events in Josephus,
The Jewish War 4:487 and 4:550–551.
Jerash (Decapolis) () The site
Jerash in
Transjordan (Gerasa) is often mentioned in the writings of Josephus. The recent debate by scholars, however, does not concern those references, but rather one reference in Josephus (
The Jewish War 4.9.1) and where this
Gerasa was thought to be of strategic importance, and that its capture deemed necessary by the Romans to quell the revolt in Jerusalem. Josephus' reference to this
Gerasa has intrigued many scholars.
H. St. J. Thackeray, translator and editor of Josephus'
The Jewish War (4.9.1), and
John Kitto, have both thought that this
Gerasa is none other than the site Jerash in Transjordan. of Transjordan Historical geographers have argued against Thackeray's view, claiming that Jerash in Transjordan was a Greek city on the side of the Romans, and even if the Jews had taken possession of Gerasa and expelled the Greeks, it leaves unexplained why Annius destroyed the city and also devastated the surrounding area - in the area of the
Decapolis which was hardly Jewish; in fact, the excavations there have revealed no destruction at the time of the Jewish uprising.
Samuel Klein takes the argument further, writing "
Gerasa.
The Jewish War 4.9.1. They have already made it known, quite consummately, that it is impossible to say that his intention here is to the city Gerasa which is in Transjordan. For this reason, some have sought to make different emendations [to the original text]: such as by changing the word to read 'Gazara', that is to say, '
Gezer,' etc. However, these same people who assay to 'correct' the text do not ask themselves what need was there for them (i.e. the Roman army) to capture Gezer in the Shefelah in order to shut-off Jerusalem from all sides? Hadn't they already captured the mountain passes, with
Emmaus in the West!?" ==See also==