Hadith of the warning

Verse 26:214 of the Quran, known also as the verse of (), is directed at Muhammad, "And warn your nearest relations." The verse of the thus commanded Muhammad to make his prophetic mission public by inviting his relatives to Islam around 613 or 617 CE, some three years after the first divine revelation, according to the early historians Ibn Sa'd () and Ibn Ishaq (). There are two versions of how things unfolded, which might correspond to two separate attempts by Muhammad, though both attempts were reportedly thwarted by his uncle Abu Lahab. The verse of the may also parallel Abraham's warning to his father in the same chapter (Surah|) of the Quran. == Approaching enemy ==

According to the first version, Muhammad addressed his clan with a warning that likened the Judgement Day to an approaching enemy, as reported in , a canonical Sunni compilation of hadiths. In other variants, Muhammad also warned his close relatives about Judgement Day, saying, "I possess nothing to your credit with God." Nevertheless, these variants might have been independent statements later linked to the verse of the to lend more credibility to the idea of free will in Islam. In this first version, Abu Lahab responded to Muhammad with abusive comments, as transmitted by the early exegete Ibn Abbas, retorting, "Damn you, is this what you called us for?" Views The implication that even kinship to Muhammad does not secure salvation has an anti-Shia message in the opinion of the Islamicist Uri Rubin (), since the Shia values the kinship of their imams with Muhammad. Indeed, Wilferd Madelung (), another expert, believes that the families of the past prophets play a prominent role in the Quran, to the point that their descendants are often selected by God in the Quran as the spiritual and material heirs to the prophets. His view is shared by the historian Husain M. Jafri (). Yet merit is also a Quranic criterion for membership in a prophet's household (), argues the philosopher Oliver Leaman. For instance, Madelung and Rainer Brunner, another Islamicist, both observe that renegade members of the families of the past prophets are not excluded from God's punishment in the Quran. In particular, Noah's family is saved from the deluge, except his wife and one of his sons, about whom Noah's plea was rejected in verse 11:46, "O Noah, he [your son] is not of your family ()." == Feast ==

According to the second version, Muhammad gathered his relatives for a meal. Then he invited them to Islam, as reported by the Sunni historian al-Tabari () in his on the authority of Ali, via Ibn Abbas. In this tradition, Abu Lahab foiled Muhammad's first attempt by dispersing the crowd. On the second attempt, Muhammad announced, Possibly the youngest there at the age of about fourteen, Ali was the only relative who offered his assistance to Muhammad, according to al-Tabari. In response, Muhammad brought him close and declared, Muhammad's announcement was nonetheless met with ridicule from Abu Lahab and the guests dispersed, al-Tabari concludes. The account of the Shia-leaning Ibn Ishaq () is similar to that of al-Tabari. The Sunni historian Ibn Hisham (), however, omitted this tradition from his recension of Ibn Ishaq's , possibly because of its Shia implications. Muhammad's response to Ali in this particular tradition is also not included in , a Sunni collection of hadiths. In contrast, the response above appears in Shia exegeses under the verse of the , including those by al-Qumi () and al-Tabarsi (). Among Sunnis, traditions similar to that of al-Tabari are also reported by Abu al-Fida () in his and by Ibn Kathir () in his universal history . Miracle , located in Medina, present-day Saudi Arabia Some traditions attribute a miraculous aspect to this event. For instance, the Sunni historian Ibn Sa'd () narrates that Muhammad fed his guests with a single plate of food, which Abu Lahab dismissed as a sorcery. In this tradition, however, Muhammad rejects Ali's offer to help because of his youth. This negative response to Ali is similar to that in a separate tradition in . Views Rubin writes that Ali's response to the invitation of Muhammad contrasts the response of his tribe, the Quraysh. He and Moojan Momen, another expert, suggest that the early appointment of Ali as Muhammad's heir in this version supports his right to succeed Muhammad, a central tenet of Shia Islam. Indeed, it is in this vein that the Shia exegete Muhammad H. Tabatabai () invokes this tradition. Rubin also notes that the association of this tradition with the verse of the lends it divine authorization. At any rate, the linguist Richard F. Burton () comments that this banquet "won for [Muhammad] a proselyte worth a thousand sabers in the person of Ali, son of Abu Talib." ==See also==