Politically, the US Chamber of Commerce is considered to be on the
political right and promotes
fiscally conservative policies. However, it is known to take positions that many Republicans (particularly
populists) do not support such as
immigration reform and
free trade. The US Chamber of Commerce opposes tariffs. The US Chamber is often associated with the
establishment wing of the Republican Party. In recent years the US Chamber has endorsed some congressional Democrats for re-election.
Legislation • Campaigned against portions of the
Sarbanes–Oxley Act. (Introduced 02/14/2002) (07/30/2002 Became Public Law) • Supported the SAFETY Act. (Passed 2002) • Supported the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. • Supported the Food Safety Modernization Act. (Introduced 03/03/2009) • In April 2009, the Chamber began an ad campaign against the proposed
Employee Free Choice Act. Critics such as the
National Association of Manufacturers have contended that additional use of card check elections will lead to overt coercion on the part of union organizers. Opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act also claim, referring to perceived lack of access to a secret ballot, that the measure would not protect employee privacy. For this reason the Chamber argued the act would reduce workers' rights. • Opposed the
American Clean Energy and Security Act climate change bill. (Introduced 05/15/2009) • The Chamber views some reform as necessary, but opposed the
Dodd/Frank legislation that was passed, asserting that it would damage loan availability. • Supported the
Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). (Introduced in House 10/26/2011) • Supported the Jobs Act of 2012. (Introduced 12/08/2011) (04/05/2012 Became Public Law) • Supported the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act. (Introduced 02/25/2013) (07/22/2014 Became Public Law) • Supported the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. (Introduced 02/04/2015) • Actively lobbies against anti-tobacco policies implemented in other countries. In particular, it opposes attempts to carve out tobacco from the
Investor-state dispute settlement mechanism negotiated under the
Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement. (The TPP was not ratified) • Supported the Ozone Implementation Act of 2017 (Introduced 02/01/2017) • Supported the Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency Act. (Introduced 02/07/2017) • Supported the Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act. (Introduced 02/09/2017) • Supported the SAFE Act. (Introduced 03/16/2017) • Opposed the
American Health Care Act of 2017. • Opposed the
Clean Power Plan. (added new bullet point) (On March 28, 2017) • Supported the Reauthorization Act. (Introduced 04/25/2017) • Supported the Self Drive Act. (Introduced 07/25/2017) • Supported the Tribal Tax and Investment Reform Act of 2017. (Introduced 10/05/2017) • Opposes the
DISCLOSE Act, which aims to limit foreign influence on U.S. elections. (House - 06/27/2018) • Opposed to using the government shutdown and
debt ceiling limit as negotiating tactics. • Qualified opposition to financial regulation. • Filed an
amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in
Citizens United v FEC to urge the court to overrule Austin and restore "free corporate speech." Its position is opposed by some advocates for independent businesses. • Filed a lawsuit against the
$100,000 increase in
H-1B visa filing fees. In its filing, the Chamber of Commerce said that the increase is unlawful because the
Immigration and Nationality Act requires that any visa filing fees be based on the government's processing costs and the $100,000 fees exceed those costs. The Chamber of Commerce also said that U.S. businesses would be harmed by the fees because they would need to either increase their labor costs or hire fewer highly skilled employees that they cannot find in the U.S.
Climate change Until 2019, the U.S. Chamber rejected the
scientific consensus on climate change. Historically, the organization has promoted the work of
climate change deniers and sought to stymie efforts to combat climate change. In 2019, the organization acknowledged that humans contribute to climate change. Chamber CEO Tom Donohue disavowed the comment, but the Chamber strongly opposed the
American Clean Energy and Security Act. In response to this position, several companies quit the Chamber, including
Exelon Corp,
PG&E Corp,
PNM Resources, and
Apple Inc.
Nike, Inc resigned from their board of directors position, but continued their membership. Nike stated that they believe they can better influence the policy by being part of the conversation. Peter Darbee, CEO of former chamber member
PG&E (a natural gas and electric utility company in California), said, "We find it dismaying that the Chamber neglects the indisputable fact that a decisive majority of experts have said the data on global warming are compelling... In our view, an intellectually honest argument over the best policy response to the challenges of climate change is one thing; disingenuous attempts to diminish or distort the reality of these challenges are quite another." In response to an online campaign of
Prius owners organized by
Moveon.org,
Toyota stated that it would not leave the Chamber. The Aspen Chamber Resort Association of
Aspen, Colorado left the U.S. Chamber because of its views on climate change, in light of how climate change could hurt Aspen's winter tourism industry. In 2010, U.S. Chamber president Tom Donohue agreed to work with Senators
John Kerry,
Lindsey Graham, and
Joe Lieberman as they crafted legislation to address climate change; the effort fell apart and failed to produce a bill. The climate campaign organization
350.org estimated that 94% of US Chamber of Commerce political contributions during the 2010 midterm elections went to
candidates denying the scientific consensus on climate change. In March 2017, before President Trump withdrew the US from the
Paris Agreement, the Chamber funded a report that said the US commitments under the international agreement would significantly reduce industrial sector jobs. In October 2017, Karen Harbert, CEO of the U.S. Chamber's Global Energy Institute, published an op-ed in USA Today criticizing the EPA's
Clean Power Plan, saying, "The plan's fundamental flaw was that it would have intentionally raised the cost of energy without regard to the impact on families and businesses." Harbert added, "To be clear, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce believes that the climate is changing, and that man is contributing to these changes. We also believe that technology and innovation, rather than sweeping federal mandates, offer the best approach for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating the impacts of climate change." In November 2019, the U.S. Chamber adopted the following policy
addressing climate change: "The climate is changing and humans are contributing to these changes. We believe that there is much common ground on which all sides of this discussion could come together to address climate change with policies that are practical, flexible, predictable, and durable. We believe in a policy approach that acknowledges the costs of action and inaction and the competitiveness of the U.S. economy." They recommended that the US rejoin the Paris Agreement and summarized that an effective climate policy should: • Leverage the power of business (rely primarily on private sector) • Maintain U.S. leadership in climate science • Embrace technology and innovation • Aggressively pursue greater energy efficiency • Promote climate resilient infrastructure • Support trade in U.S. technologies and products • Encourage international cooperation In 2019, the organization said it had no position on a carbon tax. and
Trans-Pacific Partnership. It has opposed President
Donald Trump's protectionist policies. In February 2025, the Chamber called for an end to the tariffs proposed by Trump during his second term in office, citing harms to businesses, workers, and consumers.
Immigration reform The U.S. Chamber opposed President
Donald Trump's executive order ending the
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. The U.S. Chamber's Chief Policy Officer Neil Bradley said, "With approximately 700,000 DACA recipients working for all sorts of businesses across the country, terminating their employment eligibility runs contrary to the president's goal of growing the U.S. economy." The Chamber of Commerce has come under attack by populist conservatives and others for its support of "amnesty" for illegal immigrants. In 2014, Tom Donohue stated the Chamber will "pull out all stops" for the passage of immigration reform in Congress. According to
The Washington Post, Donohue did not offer specifics with regard to provisions or bills on the matter, speaking generally about the impact that immigration reform would have on the U.S. economy. In 2022, the Chamber of Commerce said it supported the doubling of legal immigration into the U.S. and a "permanent solution" for illegal immigrants who entered the U.S. as children. It said that these actions would reduce disruptions to supply chains and put a stop to increasing inflation rates.
Non-compete agreements The Chamber of Commerce has lobbied against bans of
non-compete agreements, as well as threatened to sue the
Federal Trade Commission if it bans non-compete agreements. Non-compete agreements restrict the ability of workers to leave their jobs and work elsewhere or work independently. The Chamber has argued, "noncompete agreements are an important tool in fostering innovation and preserving competition." ==Lobbying expenditures==