The Concept of Representation Critics of
The Concept of Representation (1967) argue that Pitkin approaches the issue of representation from the wrong angle. It is argued that Pitkin's dependence on linguistics is not what makes her argument sound, but rather her knowledge as a political theorist. Additionally, Pitkin's criticisms of
Thomas Hobbes are argued against, as she believes that Hobbes offers only partial representation through authorizing one
sovereign to act for its people. In these political explanations, it is believed that Pitkin relies on mistaken assumptions: Pitkin first assumes the parallel between British and American political experiences and also neglects the role of workers' unions in modern societies as a means for representation. Overall, critics claim that Pitkin omits key facets of representation in its many forms.
Fortune is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of Niccoló Machiavelli Critics of Pitkin in
Fortune is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of Niccoló Machiavelli (1984, 1999) disagree with Pitkin's assessment of
Machiavelli's misogyny for a variety of reasons. It is claimed that Pitkin's argued thesis is repetitive and rigid, ultimately weakening her argument. In her arguments, Pitkin does not acknowledge that the Italian language, which Machiavelli wrote in, did not include gender neutral terms, making Machiavelli seem more patriarchal than he was. In Pitkin's rigid, feminist stance against Machiavelli guided by psychoanalysis, it can also be argued that her theory is misleading and utopian because it does not consider the historical period of Machiavelli's writings. Opposing arguments, rather than viewing Pitkin as being too rigid, believe Pitkin excuses Machiavelli's misogyny through evaluations of Machiavelli only at his best moments. Although all critics comment upon Pitkin's assessment of Machiavelli's misogyny, they take various stances. == Awards and legacy ==