published in
Florence around 1480 and included in
Francesco Berlinghieri's expanded edition of
Ptolemy's
Geographia. in 1683, showing
Jerusalem In 1486, hostilities broke out between the
Mamluks and the
Ottoman Turks in a battle for control over western Asia. The
Ottoman Empire proceeded to conquer Palestine following their 1516 victory over the Mamluks at the
Battle of Marj Dabiq. The Ottoman
conquest of Palestine was relatively swift, with small battles fought against the Mamluks in the
Jordan Valley and at
Khan Yunis en route to the
Mamluk capital in Egypt. There were also minor uprisings in Gaza, Ramla and Safad, which were quickly suppressed. The Ottomans maintained the administrative and political organisation that the Mamluks left in Palestine.
Greater Syria became an
eyalet (province) ruled from
Damascus, while the Palestine region within it was divided into the five
sanjaks (provincial districts, also called
liwa′ in Arabic) of
Safad,
Nablus,
Jerusalem,
Lajjun and
Gaza. The
sanjaks were further subdivided into subdistricts called
nawahi (sing.
nahiya). For much of the 16th century, the Ottomans ruled
Damascus Eyalet in a centralised way, with the
Istanbul-based
Sublime Porte (imperial government) playing a crucial role in maintaining public order and domestic security, collecting taxes, and regulating the economy, religious affairs and social welfare. Most of Palestine's population, estimated to be around 200,000 in the early years of Ottoman rule, lived in villages. The largest cities were Gaza, Safad and Jerusalem, each with a population of around 5,000–6,000. Ottoman property administration consisted of a system of fiefs called
timar and trusts called
waqf.
Timar lands were distributed by the
sultan to various officers and officials, particularly from the elite
sipahi units. A
timar was a source of income for its holder, who was responsible for maintaining order and enforcing the law in the
timar.
Waqf land was owned by various individuals and its revenues were dedicated to religious functions and institutions, social welfare and individual beneficiaries. Over 60% of cultivated land in the Jerusalem Sanjak was
waqf land. To a lesser extent, there was also privately owned land predominantly located within villages and their immediate vicinity. The name "Palestine" was no longer used as the official name of an administrative unit under the Ottomans because they typically named provinces after their capitals. Nonetheless, the old name remained popular and semi-official, with many examples of its usage in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries surviving. The 16th-century Jerusalem-based Islamic jurist Sayf al-Islam Abu'l Sa'ud Effendi defined the term as an alternative name for
Arazi-i Muqaddas (
Ottoman Turkish for "the Holy Land"). The 17th-century Ramla-based jurist
Khayr al-Din al-Ramli often used the term "Filastin" in his
fatawat (religious edicts) without defining the term, although some of his
fatawat suggest that it more or less corresponded with the borders of
Jund Filastin. Thomas Salmon's 18th-century book,
Modern history or, the present state of all nations, states that "Jerusalem is still reckoned the capital city of Palestine, though much fallen from its ancient grandeur."
Ridwan-Farrukh-Turabay period By the end of the 16th century, direct Ottoman rule over Damascus Eyalet was weakened, partly due to the
Jelali revolts and other
Anatolian insurrections. The
timar system, which functioned to serve the fiscal and military needs of the Ottoman government, was also becoming less relevant during this period. Consequently, a new governing elite emerged in Palestine consisting of the
Ridwan,
Farrukh and
Turabay dynasties whose members provided the
district governors of the Gaza, Nablus, Jerusalem and Lajjun
sanjaks between the late 16th century and the late 17th century. The stability of their rule varied by
sanjak, with Ridwan control of Gaza, Turabay control of Lajjun, and Farrukh control of Nablus largely continuous, and the Ridwan-Farrukh hold over Jerusalem frequently interrupted by governors appointed from Istanbul. Ties between the families were solidified through inter-marriage, business and political cooperation. From the late 16th century until the early 18th century, the prestigious post of
amir al-hajj (commander of the
Hajj caravan) would often be assigned to the district governor of Nablus or Gaza. This tradition laid the foundation for a durable military alliance between the three families since the departing
amir al-hajj from one of these families would entrust authority over his
sanjak to the governor of the neighboring
sanjak. Gradually, the ties between the Ridwan, Farrukh and Turabay families led to the establishment of a single extended dynasty that held sway over much of Palestine. In 1622, the
Druze emir (prince) of
Mount Lebanon,
Fakhr-al-Din II gained control of Safad Sanjak and was appointed governor of Nablus and
mutasallim (chief tax collector) of Gaza. Alarmed at the looming threat to their rule, the Ridwan-Farrukh-Turabay alliance prepared for a confrontation with Fakhr ad-Din by pooling their financial resources to acquire arms and bribe Bedouin tribes to fight alongside them. They were also tacitly supported by the Sublime Porte, which was wary of Fakhr ad-Din's growing autonomy. When Fakhr ad-Din's better-equipped army launched an offensive to gain control of Palestine's coastal plain and Jerusalem, the army of Hasan Arab Ridwan, Ahmad Turabay and Muhammad ibn Farrukh routed his forces at the
Awja River near
Jaffa. In 1624, following the
Battle of Anjar, Fakhr ad-Din was appointed the "Emir of Arabistan" by the Ottomans, which gave him official authority over the region between Aleppo and Jerusalem. He was deposed and hanged a decade later by the
Wali of Damascus.
Imperial attempts at centralization Gaza's political influence in Palestine rose under the Ridwan dynasty, particularly during the governorship of
Husayn Pasha, which began in the 1640s. It was considered the "capital of Palestine" by the French consul of Jerusalem,
Chevalier d'Arvieux. Husayn's closeness with France and his good relations with Palestine's Christian communities were a source of imperial consternation at his rule. Concurrently, in the mid-17th century, the Ottoman government guided by the
Köprülü viziers attempted to restore centralized authority over its outlier provinces. One of the centralization measures introduced by Grand Vizier
Köprülü Mehmed Pasha was the establishment of the
Sidon Eyalet in 1660, which administratively separated Safad Sanjak from the rest of Palestine, which remained part of Damascus Eyalet. This reorganization was done to both weaken the ambitious governors of Damascus and to maintain stricter control over the rebellious
emirs of Mount Lebanon. With the elimination of Fakhr ad-Din's threat to Ottoman control in the
Levant, the Sublime Porte sought to bring an end to the Ridwan-Farrukh-Turabay dynasty. Beside concern over their increasing consolidation of power in Palestine, the Sublime Porte was frustrated by the substantially decreased revenues from the annual Hajj caravan, which a governor from one of the three families often commanded. In 1657, the Ottoman authorities launched a military expedition in Palestine to reassert imperial control over the region because of its strategic importance in the funding and protection of the Hajj caravan and also because it was a crucial link to Egypt. The Sublime Porte used Husayn Pasha's alleged incompetence leading the Hajj caravan in 1662–63 to imprison and execute him. Husayn Pasha served as the foundation of the Ridwan-Farrukh-Turabay alliance and his death was followed by the Sublime Porte's gradual elimination of the rest of the extended dynasty by the late 1670s. Ridwan rule persisted in Gaza until 1690. The elimination of the Ridwan-Farrukh-Turabay dynasty and their replacement by governors appointed by the Ottoman government "radically changed the state of affairs" in Palestine, according to historian Dror Ze'evi. The appointed governors abandoned the relationships that the local dynasties maintained with the local elites and largely ignored the increasing exploitation of the populace by the
Janissaries,
subashis and
timar holders. Official complaints to the Sublime Porte about the latter groups skyrocketed among Muslims, Christians and Jews alike. Many peasants abandoned their villages to avoid exploitation, townspeople complained about the seizure of their property and the
ulama (Muslim scholarly class) complained about the Janissaries' disregard for justice and the sanctity of Muslim places of worship, including the
Temple Mount (Haram al-Sharif). In reaction to this state of affairs, in 1703, an uprising, known as the
Naqib al-Ashraf Revolt, by the people of Jerusalem took place, led by the chief of the
ashraf families, Muhammad ibn Mustafa al-Husayni, and backed by the city's notables. The home of Jerusalem's
qadi, a symbol of imperial authority, was ransacked and his translator killed by rebels. They proceeded to govern the city themselves until an Ottoman siege and internal strife forced al-Husayni and his rebels to withdraw from Jerusalem in October 1705. Meanwhile, the mostly Arab
sipahi officers of the 1657 centralization expedition, chief among them members of the Nimr family, settled in
Nablus and, contrary to the Sublime Porte's intention, began forming their own local power bases in the city's rural hinterland from the
timars they were assigned. Towards the end of the 17th century, they were soon followed by the
Jarrar and
Tuqan families, who like the Nimrs, came from other parts of
Ottoman Syria. The sheikhs (chiefs) of these families soon emerged as the new nobility of central Palestine. They developed increasingly close ties to the local population through selling or leasing their
timars to rural notables, investing in local commerce, property and businesses such as
soap factories, and intermarrying and partnering with local
ashraf and mercantile families. Politically, the Tuqans and Nimrs dominated the governorship of Nablus and at times controlled other districts and subdistricts (in 1723 Salih Pasha Tuqan was governor of the Nablus, Lajjun and Gaza
sanjaks). The Jarrars were the dominant clan of the Nablus hinterland, although other clans, among them the Mamluk-era
Jayyusis, continued to hold influence in their respective subdistricts. This state of affairs in Jabal Nablus persisted with minor interruptions until the mid-19th century. == Dominance of Acre and autonomy of Nablus ==