History Early '' The name
Magnolia first appeared in 1703 in the
Genera written by French botanist
Charles Plumier, for a flowering tree from the island of
Martinique (
talauma). It was named after French botanist
Pierre Magnol. English botanist
William Sherard, who studied botany in Paris under
Joseph Pitton de Tournefort, a pupil of Magnol, was most probably the first after Plumier to adopt the genus name
Magnolia. He was at least responsible for the
taxonomic part of
Johann Jacob Dillenius's
Hortus Elthamensis and of
Mark Catesby's
Natural History of Carolina, Florida and the Bahama Islands. These were the first works after Plumier's
Genera that used the name
Magnolia, this time for some species of
flowering trees from
temperate North America. The species that Plumier originally named
Magnolia was later described as
Annona dodecapetala by
Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and has since been named
Magnolia plumieri and
Talauma plumieri (among a number of other names), but is now known as
Magnolia dodecapetala.
Carl Linnaeus, who was familiar with Plumier's
Genera, adopted the genus name
Magnolia in 1735 in his first edition of
Systema Naturae, without a description but with a reference to Plumier's work. In 1753, he took up Plumier's
Magnolia in the first edition of
Species Plantarum. He described a
monotypic genus, with the sole species being
Magnolia virginiana. Since Linnaeus never saw a herbarium specimen (if there ever was one) of Plumier's
Magnolia and had only his description and a rather poor picture at hand, he must have taken it for the same plant that was described by
Mark Catesby in his 1730
Natural History of Carolina. He placed it in the
synonymy of
Magnolia virginiana var.
fœtida, the
taxon now known as
Magnolia grandiflora. Under
Magnolia virginiana, Linnaeus described five varieties (
glauca,
fœtida,
grisea,
tripetala, and
acuminata). In the tenth edition of
Systema Naturae (1759), he merged
grisea with
glauca and raised the four remaining varieties to species status. By the end of the 18th century, botanists and plant hunters exploring Asia had begun to name and describe the
Magnolia species from China and Japan. The first Asiatic species to be described by western botanists were
Magnolia denudata,
Magnolia liliiflora,
Magnolia coco, and
Magnolia figo. Soon after that, in 1794,
Carl Peter Thunberg collected and described
Magnolia obovata from Japan, and roughly at the same time
Magnolia kobus was also first collected.
Recent With the number of species increasing, the genus was divided into two subgenera,
Magnolia and
Yulania.
Magnolia contains the American evergreen species
M. grandiflora, which is of horticultural importance, especially in the southeastern United States, and
M. virginiana, the
type species.
Yulania contains several deciduous Asiatic species, such as
M. denudata and
M. kobus, which have become horticulturally important in their own right and as parents in
hybrids. Classified in
Yulania is also the American deciduous
M. acuminata (cucumber tree), which has recently attained greater status as the parent responsible for the yellow flower color. Relations in the family Magnoliaceae have puzzled taxonomists for a long time. Because the family is quite old and has survived many geological events (such as ice ages, mountain formation, and continental drift), its distribution has become scattered. Some species or groups of species have been isolated for a long time, while others could stay in close contact. To create divisions in the family (or even within the genus
Magnolia) solely based upon morphological characters has proven to be a nearly impossible task. By the end of the 20th century,
DNA sequencing had become available as a method of large-scale research on
phylogenetic relationships. Several studies, including studies on many species in the family Magnoliaceae, were carried out to investigate relationships. What these studies all revealed was that the genus
Michelia and
Magnolia subgenus
Yulania were far more closely allied to each other than either one of them was to
Magnolia subgenus
Magnolia. These phylogenetic studies were supported by morphological data. As
nomenclature is supposed to reflect relationships, the situation with the species names in
Michelia and
Magnolia subgenus
Yulania was undesirable. Taxonomically, three choices are available: • to join
Michelia and
Yulania species in a common genus, not being
Magnolia (for which the name
Michelia has priority); • to raise subgenus
Yulania to generic rank, leaving
Michelia names and subgenus
Magnolia names untouched, or; • to join
Michelia with the genus
Magnolia into the genus
Magnolia s.l. (a big genus).
Magnolia subgenus
Magnolia cannot be renamed because it contains
M. virginiana, the type species of the genus and of the family. Not many
Michelia species have so far become horticulturally or economically important, apart from their wood. Both subgenus
Magnolia and subgenus
Yulania include species of major horticultural importance, and a change of name would be very undesirable for many people, especially in the horticultural branch. In Europe,
Magnolia is even more or less a synonym for
Yulania, since most of the cultivated species on this continent have
Magnolia (Yulania) denudata as one of their parents. Most taxonomists who acknowledge close relations between
Yulania and
Michelia therefore support the third option and join
Michelia with
Magnolia. The same goes,
mutatis mutandis, for the (former) genera
Talauma and
Dugandiodendron, which are then placed in subgenus
Magnolia, and genus
Manglietia, which could be joined with subgenus
Magnolia or may even earn the status of an extra subgenus.
Elmerrillia seems to be closely related to
Michelia and
Yulania, in which case it will most likely be treated in the same way as
Michelia is now. The precise nomenclatural status of small or monospecific genera like
Kmeria,
Parakmeria,
Pachylarnax,
Manglietiastrum,
Aromadendron,
Woonyoungia,
Alcimandra,
Paramichelia, and
Tsoongiodendron remains uncertain. Taxonomists who merge
Michelia into
Magnolia tend to merge these small genera into
Magnolia s.l. as well. Botanists do not agree on whether to recognize a big
Magnolia or the different small genera. For example,
Flora of China offers two choices: a large genus
Magnolia, which includes about 300 species and everything in the
Magnoliaceae except
Liriodendron (tulip tree), or 16 different genera, some of them recently split out or re-recognized, each of which contains up to 50 species. The western co-author favors the big genus
Magnolia, whereas the Chinese recognize the different small genera. New species of
Magnolia are still being discovered today. In 2014, researchers discovered
Magnolia vargasiana and
Magnolia llangantensis in Ecuador’s Cordillera Llanganates, within the Río Zuñac Reserve at 2000 meters elevation. The Río Zuñac Reserve is a privately protected conservation area in Ecuador, managed by the EcoMinga Foundation. This newly identified tree species grows between 11 and 26 meters tall and features sub-orbicular leaves, creamy white petals, and a pollination system involving flea beetles. Found during a vegetation survey, its limited distribution and low population density place it at risk of extinction.
Fossil record Fossils go back to the Late Cretaceous. Post
K-Pg fossils of
Magnolia are known from the
Paleogene, for example the species
Magnolia nanningensis, named for mummified wood from the
Oligocene of
Guangxi, China, which has a close affinity to members of the modern section
Michelia.
Subdivision In 2012, the Magnolia Society published on its website a classification of the genus produced by Richard B. Figlar, based on a 2004 classification by Figlar and
Hans Peter Nooteboom. Species of
Magnolia were listed under three
subgenera, 12
sections, and 13 subsections. Subsequent
molecular phylogenetic studies have led to some revisions of this system; for example, the subgenus
Magnolia was found not to be
monophyletic. A revised classification in 2020, based on a phylogenetic analysis of complete
chloroplast genomes, abandoned subgenera and subsections, dividing
Magnolia into 15 sections. The relationships among these sections are shown in the following
cladogram, as is the paraphyletic status of subgenus
Magnolia. }} The table below compares the 2012 and 2020 classifications. (The
circumscriptions of the corresponding taxa may not be the same.) ==Uses==