Box office The film opened at the
61st Venice Film Festival in 2004, and was released in Japan on 20 November 2004. The film grossed $14.5million in its first week of release in Japan. The film was distributed in Japan by
Toho, and made $190million in that country. It was distributed internationally by various companies, and made an additional $46million outside Japan, for a worldwide total of $236million. The film was later dubbed into English under the supervision of
Pete Docter of
Pixar, and released in the United States by
Walt Disney Pictures on 10 June 2005. It was one of the most commercially successful Japanese films ever made. Soon after its release, it became the third most financially successful film in Japan, behind
Titanic and
Spirited Away. It has since received multiple worldwide theatrical re-releases, including at the annual
Studio Ghibli Fest organized by GKIDS.
Home media On
home video, ''Howl's Moving Castle'' sold 2.7million
DVD units in Japan , and grossed over from
Blu-ray and DVD sales in the United States . It was released in the United States on
DVD on 7 March 2006 and on
Blu-ray by
Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment on 21 May 2013.
GKIDS re-released the film on Blu-ray and DVD on 17 October 2017. In the United Kingdom, the film's Studio Ghibli anniversary release was 2015's eighth best-selling
foreign language film on
home video, and fifth best-selling
Japanese film (below four other Studio Ghibli anime films). It was later 2018's fourth best-selling foreign language film in the UK (below the Japanese films
My Neighbor Totoro,
Your Name and
Blade of the Immortal).
Critical response The film also holds an 82/100 average on
Metacritic, based on 40 reviews, indicating "universal acclaim".
USA Today critic Claudia Puig gave the film a positive review, praising it for its ability to blend "a childlike sense of wonder with sophisticated emotions and motives".
Helen McCarthy in
500 Essential Anime Movies said that the natural world was "beautifully represented", with "some absolutely breathtaking mountains and lakeside landscapes". She also praised the design of the castle and added that Miyazaki added his own themes to the film: "man's relationship to nature, the futility of war, and the joy of flight".
Joe Morgenstern of
The Wall Street Journal called the film "a moveable feast of delights".
Richard Corliss of
Time wrote, "Palaces and shimmering lakes, warplanes and fire sprites all come to life at the breath of Miyazaki's graphic genius." Writing for
The Boston Globe,
Ty Burr said, "At its best, 'Howl's Moving Castle' offers a rich fantasy of adolescent escape, of romance in the old and epic sense. At its worst, it's the most amazing 12-course meal you can't bring yourself to finish."
A.O. Scott of
The New York Times wrote, "Admirers of [Hayao Miyazaki's] work, which is wildly imaginative, emotionally intense and surpassingly gentle, will find much to appreciate in this film because it demonstrates, once again, his visual ingenuity and his sensitivity as a storyteller. For newcomers to his world, "Howl's Moving Castle" is a fitting introduction to one of modern cinema's great enchanters." Conversely,
Roger Ebert of the
Chicago Sun-Times gave the film two and a half out of four stars, and called it a "disappointment" compared to Miyazaki's other recent movies. Jonathan Trout of the
BBC said, "Youngsters and Miyazaki fans will coo at the world's depth and rich surreality, but opaque plotting, and a tendency to mope with Sophie whilst Howl is off affecting events let the momentum of the first act vanish into thin air." Writing for
Salon,
Stephanie Zacharek said, "the plot of ''Howl's Moving Castle'' meanders so listlessly that its details become less and less charming. Miyazaki's storytelling style resembles that of a breathless young tot who's fearlessly exercising his newfound powers of expression."
Stephen Hunter from
The Washington Post criticized the plot of the film, saying "There is no story, or rather, there's no force to the story, which meanders almost casually this way and that for no apparent reason." However, he said that the movie also empowered young women, and was "beautiful beyond telling." David Rooney, writing in
Variety, stated that "the narrative motor roars ahead in the opening hour and is more erratic thereafter," and suggested that better translation would help. Literary scholar Matt Kimmich stated that the film came across as "uneasy compromise between two plots and two imaginations," referring to Jones' original story and Miyazaki's style of animation and storytelling. However, he stated that those scenes which were not dependent either on Jones' original plot or Miyazaki's added plot threads found "a visual humor that recalls the verbal wit and lightness of Jones's novel," and that the "animation manages to free itself from the demands of the two plots—and flies."
Top ten lists The film appeared on many critics' top ten lists of the best films of 2005. • 2nd –
Ella Taylor,
LA Weekly (tie) • 4th –
Kenneth Turan,
Los Angeles Times • 5th – Tasha Robinson,
The A.V. Club • 6th – Lawrence Toppman,
The Charlotte Observer • 6th –
Jonathan Rosenbaum,
The Chicago Reader (tie) • 8th –
Michael Sragow,
The Baltimore Sun • 8th – Michael Wilmington,
The Chicago Tribune • NA – Peter Rainer,
The Christian Science Monitor (listed alphabetically)
Accolades == Legacy ==