published in
Variations de la personnalité by
Henri Bourru and
Prosper Ferdinand Burot Early references In the 19th century,
dédoublement, or "double consciousness", the historical precursor to DID, was frequently described as a state of
sleepwalking, with scholars hypothesizing that the patients were switching between a normal consciousness and a "somnambulistic state". An intense interest in
spiritualism,
parapsychology and
hypnosis continued throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, running in parallel with
John Locke's views that there was an
association of ideas requiring the coexistence of feelings with awareness of the feelings.
Hypnosis, which was pioneered in the late 18th century by
Franz Mesmer and
Armand-Marie Jacques de Chastenet, Marques de Puységur, challenged Locke's association of ideas. Hypnotists reported what they thought were second personalities emerging during hypnosis and wondered how two minds could coexist. By the late 19th century, there was a general acceptance that emotionally traumatic experiences could cause long-term disorders that might display a variety of symptoms. These
conversion disorders were found to occur in even the most resilient individuals, but with profound effect in someone with emotional instability like
Louis Vivet (1863–?), who had a traumatic experience as a 17-year-old when he encountered a viper. Vivet was the subject of countless medical papers and became the most studied case of dissociation in the 19th century. Between 1880 and 1920, various international medical conferences devoted time to sessions on dissociation. It was in this climate that
Jean-Martin Charcot introduced his ideas of the impact of nervous shocks as a cause for a variety of neurological conditions. One of Charcot's students,
Pierre Janet, took these ideas and went on to develop his own theories of dissociation. One of the first individuals diagnosed with multiple personalities to be scientifically studied was Clara Norton Fowler, under the
pseudonym Christine Beauchamp; American
neurologist Morton Prince studied Fowler between 1898 and 1904, describing her
case study in his 1906
monograph,
Dissociation of a Personality.
20th century In the early 20th century, interest in dissociation and multiple personalities waned for several reasons. After Charcot died in 1893, many of his so-called hysterical patients were exposed as frauds, and Janet's association with Charcot tarnished his theories of dissociation. Whereas Kraepelin's natural disease entity was anchored in the metaphor of progressive deterioration and mental weakness and defect, Bleuler offered a reinterpretation based on dissociation or "splitting" (
Spaltung) and widely broadened the inclusion criteria for the diagnosis. A review of the
Index medicus from 1903 through 1978 showed a dramatic decline in the number of reports of multiple personality after the diagnosis of schizophrenia became popular, especially in the United States. The rise of the broad diagnostic category of dementia praecox has also been posited in the disappearance of "hysteria" (the usual diagnostic designation for cases of multiple personalities) by 1910. Several factors helped create a large climate of skepticism and disbelief; paralleling the increased suspicion of DID was the decline of interest in dissociation as a laboratory and clinical phenomenon. The cause of the sudden increase of cases is indefinite, but it may be attributed to the increased awareness, which revealed previously undiagnosed cases or new cases may have been induced by the influence of the media on the behavior of individuals and the judgement of therapists. it presented a detailed discussion of the problems of treatment of "Sybil Isabel Dorsett", a
pseudonym for
Shirley Ardell Mason. Though the book and subsequent films helped popularize the diagnosis and trigger an epidemic of the diagnosis, later analysis of the case suggested different interpretations, ranging from Mason's problems having been caused by the therapeutic methods and
sodium pentathol injections used by her psychiatrist,
C. B. Wilbur, or an inadvertent hoax due in part to the lucrative publishing rights, David Spiegel, a Stanford psychiatrist whose father treated Shirley Ardell Mason on occasion, says that his father described Mason as "a brilliant hysteric. He felt that Wilbur tended to pressure her to exaggerate on the dissociation she already had." As media attention on DID increased, so too did the controversy surrounding the diagnosis.
History in the DSM The DSM-II used the term
hysterical neurosis, dissociative type. It described the possible occurrence of alterations in the patient's state of consciousness or identity, and included the symptoms of "amnesia, somnambulism, fugue, and multiple personality". The DSM-IV-TR criteria for DID have been criticized for failing to capture the clinical complexity of DID, lacking usefulness in diagnosing individuals with DID (for instance, by focusing on the two least frequent and most subtle symptoms of DID) producing a high rate of
false negatives and an excessive number of DDNOS diagnoses, for excluding
possession (seen as a cross-cultural form of DID), and for including only two "core" symptoms of DID (amnesia and self-alteration) while failing to discuss hallucinations, trance-like states,
somatoform,
depersonalization, and
derealization symptoms. Arguments have been made for allowing diagnosis through the presence of some, but not all of the characteristics of DID rather than the current exclusive focus on the two least common and noticeable features. for being
tautological, using imprecise and undefined language and for the use of instruments that give a false sense of validity and empirical certainty to the diagnosis. The
DSM-5 updated the definition of DID in 2013, summarizing the changes as: Between 1968 and 1980, the term that was used for dissociative identity disorder was "Hysterical neurosis, dissociative type". The APA wrote in the second edition of the DSM: "In the dissociative type, alterations may occur in the patient's state of consciousness or in his identity, to produce such symptoms as amnesia, somnambulism, fugue, and multiple personality." The number of cases sharply increased in the late 1970s and throughout the 80s, and the first scholarly
monographs on the topic appeared in 1986. and also added Post-traumatic Stress Disorder in Anxiety Disorders section. In the opinion of
McGill University psychiatrist Joel Paris, this inadvertently legitimized them by forcing textbooks, which mimicked the structure of the DSM, to include a separate chapter on them, and increased the diagnosis of dissociative conditions. Once a rarely occurring spontaneous phenomenon (research in 1944 showed only 76 cases), the diagnosis became "an artifact of bad (or naïve) psychotherapy" as patients capable of dissociating were accidentally encouraged to express their symptoms by "overly fascinated" therapists. "Interpersonality amnesia" was removed as a diagnostic feature from the DSM-III in 1987, which may have contributed to the increasing frequency of the diagnosis.
Joan Acocella reports that 40,000 cases were diagnosed from 1985 to 1995. Scientific publications regarding DID peaked in the mid-1990s, rapidly declined, The
ICD-10 classified DID as a "Dissociative [conversion] disorder" and used the name "multiple personality disorder" with the classification number of F44.81.
21st century A 2006 study compared scholarly research and publications on DID and
dissociative amnesia to other mental health conditions, such as
anorexia nervosa,
alcohol use disorder, and
schizophrenia from 1984 to 2003. The results were found to be unusually distributed, with a very low level of publications in the 1980s followed by a significant rise that peaked in the mid-1990s and subsequently rapidly declined in the decade following. Compared to 25 other diagnoses, the mid-1990s "bubble" of publications regarding DID was unique. In the opinion of the authors of the review, the publication results suggest a period of "fashion" that waned, and that the two diagnoses "presently do not command widespread scientific acceptance." A 2024 review found "steady" continued research after 2011, with 160 academic studies located in the 2011-2021 period, an increase of 60% over the previous decade. Authors previously skeptical of DID have adopted a "trans-theoretical" approach where trauma and social factors are simply two of many potential factors, indicating that "the heat of past DID controversies has diminished some with the rise of multidimensional models of psychopathology". ==Society and culture==