Scholarship addressing internalized racism has existed long before the emergence of the terminology itself. In 1903, African American civil rights activist
W. E. B. Du Bois wrote about the existence of "double-consciousness", or "this sense of always looking at one's self through the eyes of others, of measuring one's soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity," to explain American racial minorities' self-perception as heavily influenced by the white majority's perception of them. Sociologists Karen and Tran Dang wrote: "Due to the discomfort, confusion, and embarrassment the subject raises, an intellectual taboo surrounds the study of internalized racism. A major concern is that because internalized racism reveals dynamics by which oppression is reproduced, it will lead to blaming the victims and move attention away from the racist institutions and practices that privilege whites at the expense of people of color. Internalized racism also causes discomfort because it suggests that the effects of racism are deeper and broader than many would like to admit. As a result, it remains one of the least explained features of racism." Although some definitions of internalized racism only include when racial
stereotypes are internalized by the racial marginalized groups, internalized racism has been used to discuss much more than this. The creators of the Appropriated Racial Oppression Scale (AROS) note that perhaps a more accurate phrase would be "appropriated racial oppression", because this distances the usage away from potentially "
victim blaming" implications that the internalization of racist ideals and attitudes is due to some failure of the oppressed. This conviction can be corrected when black individuals self-determine their identities apart from the influence of their white counterparts.
Dimensions Scholars have picked different dimensions to categorize internalized racism. Psychologists David and Okazaki proposed that examples of internalized racism could be divided into the following: "internalized inferiority, feelings of shame and embarrassment, physical characteristics, within-group discrimination, and minimization or acceptance of oppression." Alternatively, Campón and Carter use this list: "appropriations of negative stereotypes, thinking that maintains status quo (denying racism), adaptation to white cultural standards, devaluation of own group, and emotional reactions." These categories influence how scholars organize their measurements of internalized racism. Scholar Monica M. Trieu situates internalized racism within histories of European and U.S. colonial expansion, arguing that colonial domination produced a colonial mentality in which white supremacy became normalized and is “transnational; in [which it] can and does travel with migrants and transcend nation-state borders” (Trieu, 2019, p. 4). This can be applied to South Asians, who under British colonialism (1633–1947), never emerged as belonging to white structure (Trieu, 2019, p.4). Trieu further elaborates that these hierarchies persist through racialization processes that frame Asian diasporic communities as “perpetual foreigners,” reinforcing barriers to land ownership, labour market discrimination, educational inequalities, and negative media representation (Trieu, 2019, p. 5). Under these structural conditions, South Asians may adopt strategies such as “disidentification” and “defensive othering,” distancing themselves from stigmatized identities in order to deflect assumptions of foreignness” (Trieu, 2019, p. 7).
Measures Academics have attempted to create reliable measures of internalized racism, in order to test its
correlation to health outcomes and other variables of interest. Some examples of existing scales are the Nadanolitization (NAD) and Internalized Racial Oppression Scales (used for
African Americans), the Colonial Mentality scale (used for
Filipinos), and the Mochichua Tepehuani Scale (used for
Chicano/
Latino populations). The Appropriated Racial Oppression Scale (AROS) is designed as measure for all racial minorities. In the AROS, Campón and Carter use items such as "There have been times when I have been embarrassed to be a member of my race", "I would like for my children to have light skin", and "People take racial jokes too seriously" to assess an individual's level of internalized racism. == Manifestations ==