On July 19, 2005, it was announced by President
George W. Bush that he intended to
nominate John Roberts to be an
Associate Justice on the
Supreme Court of the United States to succeed Associate Justice
Sandra Day O'Connor. Roberts was formally nominated on July 29, and the nomination was referred to the
Senate Judiciary Committee the same day.
Assessment by the American Bar Association The professional qualifications (integrity, professional competence and judicial temperament) of nominees to the Supreme Court are evaluated by the
American Bar Association's 15-member Standing Committee on Federal Judiciary, which offers a rating of "well qualified," "qualified," or "not qualified." The opinions of the committee bind neither the president nor the Senate; however, they are generally taken into account. On August 17, the ABA committee unanimously gave Roberts a "well qualified" rating. The positive review of Roberts's qualifications for the Court came amid an ongoing dispute between the
White House and the ABA over the association's role in vetting judicial candidates.
Controversies While Roberts was under consideration for the associate judgeship, a number of controversies related to the nomination arose.
Adoption records While investigating Roberts' life, the
New York Times was accused of attempting to unseal records detailing the 2000 adoption by Roberts and his wife of two infants born in Ireland via a Latin American country. The
Times denied any attempts to unseal legal records and stated that "[o]ur reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions" and "[t]hey did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue." The
Times was condemned by the National Council for Adoption, "NCFA denounces, in the strongest possible terms, the shocking decision of the
New York Times to investigate the adoption records of Justice John Roberts' two young children. The adoption community is outraged that, for obviously political reasons, the
Times has targeted the very private circumstances, motivations, and processes by which the Roberts became parents." The reasons for the adoption happening in the unnamed Latin American country remain unclear, though it was noted that the Irish 1991 Adoption Act only allows adoption of children born in Ireland by people resident in Ireland.
Federalist Society involvement Judge Roberts has stated that he cannot recall ever having been a member of the
Federalist Society. He sought and received published corrections from several major news organizations retracting earlier reports that he had been a member. On July 25, 2005, however,
The Washington Post reported that John Roberts is listed in the Society's 1997–1998 leadership directory as serving on the Steering Committee of the Federalist Society. The same source also indicates the possibility that the individuals listed in the "leadership directory" are, in a technical sense, not necessarily "members" of the society, and no confirmable membership information is officially disclosed by the Society itself.
2000 presidential election activities While an attorney at
Hogan & Hartson, Roberts met with
Florida Governor Jeb Bush and gave advice on the legal aspects of election disputes during the
Florida recount of 2000. According to
Ted Cruz, an advisor on Bush's 2000 campaign, Roberts helped polish some legal briefs and held a "moot court" session to prepare Bush's lawyers for arguments in
Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board and
Bush v. Gore.
Advertisement by NARAL On August 10, 2005,
NARAL Pro-Choice America, an advocate for legal
abortion, aired controversial
advertisements featuring
Emily Lyons, an abortion clinic director who was injured in the
Eric Rudolph clinic bombing in 1998. The ad alleged that :Supreme Court nominee John Roberts filed court briefs supporting violent fringe groups and a convicted clinic bomber... America can't afford a justice whose ideology leads him to excuse violence against other Americans. The ads ran only in
Maine and
Rhode Island, the home states of moderate Republican Senators
Olympia Snowe,
Susan Collins and
Lincoln Chafee. The brief, which was filed almost seven years before the bombing of Lyons' clinic and which dealt with obstructing access to clinics, not bombings, argued that while abortion protesters from
Operation Rescue could not be prosecuted under the 1871 Federal
Ku Klux Klan Act for discrimination, they had violated state law by trespassing. Ultimately, the
Supreme Court agreed, ruling 6 to 3 in ''
Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic'' that opposition to abortion did not constitute discrimination against women "as is evident from the fact that men and women are on both sides of the issue, just as men and women are on both sides of petitioners' unlawful demonstrations." Even before the ad was shown on
television,
White House spokesman
Steve Schmidt responded to them, describing the claims as "outrageously false, bordering on the slanderous." While Roberts in his
amicus brief for the Government, argued that abortion protestors could not be prosecuted federally for discrimination, he pointed out that the defendants obstruction was illegal under Virginia law. Further, Roberts has argued in a Reagan administration memo that violence such as bombings had no protection under the law: "No matter how lofty or sincerely held the goal, those who resort to violence to achieve it are criminals," he wrote. NARAL was unimpressed with this memo, arguing that it was not an official action like his
amicus brief. NARAL argued that "This wasn't an arcane legal dispute, but a fight over whether or not law enforcement could use their most effective weapon [the Klan Act] against extremists who use violence." After the
Bray decision, Congress passed the
Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which criminalized obstructing access to abortion clinics at the Federal level, effectively replacing the Klan Act with an even more effective legal weapon against those that obstructed access to clinics.
National Review Online argued that "The fact that this law failed to deter the 1998 bombing that injured the clinic worker featured in NARAL's ad makes it all the more ludicrous to suggest that Roberts's proper reading of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 in 1991 is somehow responsible." In the face of intense criticism even among supporters of legal abortion, NARAL eventually withdrew the ads. ==White House announcement of intention to instead nominate Roberts as Chief Justice==