President George W. Bush's alleged manipulation of EPA statements President
George W. Bush has been faulted by the
Sierra Club for allegedly interfering with the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) interpretations and pronouncements regarding air quality.
Early statement by Christine Todd Whitman On September 18, 2001,
EPA administrator Christine Todd Whitman told the public, via a
press release, "We are very encouraged that the results from our monitoring of air-quality and drinking-water conditions in both New York and near the Pentagon show that the public in these areas is not being exposed to excessive levels of asbestos or other harmful substances" and that "Given the scope of the tragedy from last week, I am glad to reassure the people of New York … that their air is safe to breathe and the water is safe to drink." Numerous key differences between the draft versions and final versions of EPA statements were found. A recommendation that homes and businesses near ground zero be cleaned by professionals was replaced by a request that citizens follow orders from NYC officials. Another statement that showed concerns about "sensitive populations" was deleted altogether. Language used to describe excessive amounts of asbestos in the area was altered drastically to minimize the dangers it posed. In September 2006, the
U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security held a two-day hearing on illnesses caused by post-9/11 air quality. Former EPA head Christine Todd Whitman was a frequent target of criticism. EPA scientist Dr.
Cate Jenkins said on
CBS television on September 8, 2006, that agency officials lied about the air quality in the weeks following September 11, 2001. She said that in her opinion the EPA knew about the toxicity of the air, and that WTC dust included asbestos and disturbingly high
pH levels. She said that some of the dust was "as caustic and alkaline as
Drano."
Dr. Marjorie Clarke also warned of the consequences of breathing toxic dust and fumes. Yet, agencies did not heed her warnings. The
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conducted a study of the World Trade Center site, but refused to release the results of its study, saying they were part of a criminal investigation. On September 13, 2006, Congressmen
Jerrold Nadler (NY),
Anthony Weiner (NY),
Bill Pascrell Jr. (NJ) filed a request with
US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to investigate whether criminal charges may be brought against Whitman for lying about air safety in the Ground Zero area.
Alleged government downplaying of health risks Critics assert that government officials – notably Bush, Christine Todd Whitman (former head of the US EPA), and New York City mayor
Rudy Giuliani – downplayed the health risks of the area and rushed to reopen the area around Ground Zero, although this posed a grave and immediate health risk to first responders. Many corporations were eager to hear the news of the
New York Stock Exchange being reopened only a few days after the collapse. On June 25, 2007, Whitman testified before a
House of Representatives committee chaired by
Jerrold Nadler. She said that a
White House official informed her that President Bush expected that the Financial District would reopen within three days, that is, by September 14. She said that she replied that this would be cumbersome, since the EPA was still judging the health situation in the area. Two days after the
collapse of the World Trade Center, mayor Giuliani said, "The air is safe as far as we can tell, with respect to chemical and biological agents." Giuliani, in attempting to deflate
New York Daily News journalist
Juan Gonzalez' reportage of the 9/11 air issue, claimed that "the problems created… are not health-threatening." In the first month after the attacks, the mayor said, "The air quality is safe and acceptable." In a September 18, 2006
New York Daily News article,
Sally Regenhard, mother of firefighter Christian Regenhard who died on September 11, is quoted, "There's a large and growing number of both FDNY families, FDNY members, former and current, and civilian families who want to expose the true failures of the Giuliani administration when it comes to 9/11." She told the
New York Daily News that she intends to "
Swift Boat" Giuliani. Congressman Nadler was quoted in a March 1, 2007, "New York Sun" article saying that he "absolutely" wishes to interview Giuliani administration officials regarding the environment in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. He asked, "Who made decisions, if any, that resulted unnecessarily in a lot of people getting sick?"
Handling of cleanup procedure A May 14, 2007,
New York Times reported that thousands of workers at Ground Zero have become sick and that "many regard Mr. Giuliani's triumph of leadership as having come with a human cost." The
Times reported that he seized control of the cleanup of Ground Zero, taking control away from established federal agencies, such as the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, the
Army Corps of Engineers and the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. He instead handed over responsibility to the "largely unknown" city Department of Design and Construction. Documents indicate that the Giuliani administration never enforced federal requirements requiring the wearing of
respirators. Concurrently, the administration threatened companies with dismissal if cleanup work slowed. On October 17, 2006, federal judge
Alvin K. Hellerstein rejected New York City's motion to dismiss lawsuits that requested health payments to the first responders. On November 19, 2010, attorneys said that plaintiffs accepted a settlement which should lead to $625 million being paid to more than 10,000 workers experiencing problems as a result of inadequate preparation to work at Ground Zero. Not all affected participated, but those who did not would be eligible for a portion of $7.4 billion provided by the
James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, which the
U.S. House passed in September 2010. New York City Mayor
Michael Bloomberg asked the
Senate to do the same. The plaintiffs in the settlement would also be eligible for compensation under the Zadroga Act. On December 22, 2010, the
United States Senate passed a 9/11 Health Bill running against opposition of the
Republican Party and aided by advocacy from comedian
Jon Stewart. The measure calls for providing $1.8 billion until 2015 to monitor and treat injuries stemming from exposure to toxic dust and debris at
World Trade Center site. There are nearly 60,000 people enrolled in health-monitoring and treatment programs related to the 9/11 attack. The bill is formally known as the
James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act, named after a New York police detective who took part in the rescue efforts at ground zero and later developed breathing complications. On October 28, 2007, Jim Riches reported that the City of New York and litigating first responders have shown interest in a
legal settlement, to resolve lawsuits against the city. The settlement would yield a financial settlement apportioned in the following manner: forty percent to lawyers, and sixty percent to litigants. The
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health issued a study on July 17, 2007, indicating that the estimates for monthly costs of treating Ground Zero workers had increased from around $6 million per month to $20 million per month by the end of 2007. The causes of the increased expense lie in the increasing numbers of workers getting sick and the worsening illnesses of workers. This indicated that the planned U.S. House appropriation legislation (of $50 million) for the sick workers, for the coming year, would be inadequate. The number of workers that have registered with area hospitals' Ground Zero programs has reached 37,000. With about 500 new workers registering each month, the institute estimated that the number of registrants could reach 65,000 in two years. (The institute is overseen by the
Department of Health and Human Services.) 40 percent of the World Trade Center workers being monitored by a Mount Sinai Hospital study lack health insurance. This is part of a larger debate over the number of people sickened by the collapse of the Twin Towers.
World Trade Center health administrators On June 11, 2007, Mayor Bloomberg appointed Jeffrey Hon as World Trade Center health coordinator. Hon had previously worked as the spokesman for the
American Red Cross September 11 Recovery Program. People have offered conflicting statements, however, regarding Hon's role. In an interview with the
New York Daily News Hon said that his role was to correct inconsistencies in city agencies and to handle related pension issues. Yet, Mayor Bloomberg said that Hon's role would not involve handling pension-related issues. A press release also indicated that the coordinator will "provide a central repository of WTC health information and ensure effective communication with those who may be experiencing 9/11-related health effects." Dr.
John Howard was appointed the medical administrator of the federal
World Trade Center Health Program funded through the
James Zadroga Act. On July 22, 2011, Howard's report on a study of a link between particulate exposure in the aftermath and cancer was released. The report said that there was insufficient evidence of a link between particulate exposure and cancer. The report's findings meant that many first responders to the attacks would be limited in their access to funds for medical treatment. Three New York Congressional delegation Representatives,
Peter T. King,
Carolyn B. Maloney and
Jerrold Nadler, said that they believed that further studies would indicate a link between exposures and cancer.
Lawsuit by area residents Lower Manhattan and
Brooklyn residents brought a 111-page lawsuit against the EPA for purported deception of the public about hazards of Ground Zero air and dust. A major force behind this effort is Brooklyn resident Jenna Orkin of the World Trade Center Environmental Organization. On February 2, 2006, Federal Court Judge
Deborah Batts issued an 83-page statement, indicating that there are sufficient grounds for the case to proceed. She also rejected granting Whitman immunity from the lawsuit. On December 10, 2007, legal proceedings began in a case on the question of responsibility of government officials in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks. Former EPA Director Whitman is among the defendants in the suit; plaintiffs in the suit allege that Whitman is at fault for saying that the downtown Manhattan air was safe in the aftermath of the attacks. On April 22, 2008, the
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that EPA head Whitman could not be held liable for saying to World Trade Center area residents that the air was safe for breathing after the buildings collapse. The appeals court said that Whitman had based her information on contradictory information and statements from President Bush. The
U.S. Department of Justice had argued that holding the agency liable would establish a risky
legal precedent because future public officials would be afraid to make public statements. Judge
Deborah Batts had previously declined to dismiss Whitman as a defendant, saying that her actions were "conscience-shocking". An arbitrator has said that most of the complainants that did not participate in an earlier fund (created by Congress) would be granted settlement awards. The awards would total $500 million. This resolution would involve all but 3 of the nearly 100 litigants.
Ground Zero workers' and area residents' protests On January 30, 2007, Ground Zero workers and groups such as
Sierra Club and Unsung Heroes Helping Heroes met at the Ground Zero site and urged President
George W. Bush to spend more money on aid for sick Ground Zero workers. They said that the $25 million that Bush promised for the ill workers was inadequate. A Long Island iron-worker, John Sferazo, at the protest rally said, "Why has it taken you 5½ years to meet with us, Mr. President?" By September 2007, the number of
plaintiffs in the case reached 10,000. "I started this suit on behalf of one cop that got sick." He continued, "Nobody would touch the case with a 10-foot pole because it was considered unpatriotic to say anything against the cleanup or the
EPA. ==Documentaries==