Avoidance principle, radius, and stretch factor If two disjoint smooth
simple closed curves undergo the curve-shortening flow simultaneously, they remain disjoint as the flow progresses. The reason is that, if two smooth curves move in a way that creates a crossing, then at the time of first crossing the curves would necessarily be tangent to each other, without crossing. But, in such a situation, the two curves' curvatures at the point of tangency would necessarily pull them apart rather than pushing them together into a crossing. For the same reason, a single simple closed curve can never evolve to cross itself. This phenomenon is known as the avoidance principle. The avoidance principle implies that any smooth closed curve must eventually reach a singularity, such as a point of infinite curvature. For, if a given smooth curve is surrounded by a circle, both will remain disjoint for as long as they both exist. But the enclosing circle shrinks under the curvature flow, remaining circular, until it collapses, and by the avoidance principle must remain contained within it. So, if were to never reach a singularity, it would be trapped at a single point at the time when the circle collapses, which is impossible for a smooth curve. This can be quantified by observing that the radius of the
smallest circle that encloses must decrease at a rate that is at least as fast as the decrease in radius of a circle undergoing the same flow. quantifies the avoidance principle for a single curve in terms of the ratio between the arc length (of the shorter of two arcs) and
Euclidean distance between pairs of points, sometimes called the
stretch factor. He shows that the stretch factor is strictly decreasing at each of its local maxima, except for the case of the two ends of a diameter of a circle in which case the stretch factor is constant at . This monotonicity property implies the avoidance principle, for if the curve would ever touch itself the stretch factor would become infinite at the two touching points.
Length As a curve undergoes the curve-shortening flow, its
length decreases at a rate given by the formula :\frac{dL}{dt} = -\int \kappa^2 \, ds, where the integral is taken over the curve, is the curvature, and is arc length along the curve. The integrand is always non-negative, and for any smooth closed curve there exist arcs within which it is strictly positive, so the length decreases monotonically. More generally, for any evolution of curves whose normal speed is , the rate of change in length is :\frac{dL}{dt} = -\int f\kappa \, ds, which can be interpreted as a negated
inner product between the given evolution and the curve-shortening flow. Thus, the curve-shortening flow can be described as the
gradient flow for length, the flow that (locally) decreases the length of the curve as quickly as possible relative to the
norm of the flow. This property is the one that gives the curve-shortening flow its name.
Area For a simple closed curve, the
area enclosed by the curve shrinks, at the constant rate of 2 units of area per unit of time, independent of the curve. Therefore, the total time for a curve to shrink to a point is proportional to its area, regardless of its initial shape. Because the area of a curve is reduced at a constant rate, and (by the
isoperimetric inequality) a circle has the greatest possible area among simple closed curves of a given length, it follows that circles are the slowest curves to collapse to a point under the curve-shortening flow. All other curves take less time to collapse than a circle of the same length. The constant rate of area reduction is the only
conservation law satisfied by the curve-shortening flow. This implies that it is not possible to express the "vanishing point" where the curve eventually collapses as an integral over the curve of any function of its points and their derivatives, because such an expression would lead to a forbidden second conservation law. However, by combining the constant rate of area loss with the avoidance principle, it is possible to prove that the vanishing point always lies within a circle, concentric with the minimum enclosing circle, whose area is the difference in areas between the enclosing circle and the given curve.
Total absolute curvature The
total absolute curvature of a smooth curve is the integral of the
absolute value of the curvature along the arc length of the curve, :K=\int|\kappa| \,ds. It can also be expressed as a sum of the angles between the normal vectors at consecutive pairs of
inflection points. It is 2 for convex curves and larger for non-convex curves, serving as a measure of non-convexity of a curve. New inflection points cannot be created by the curve-shortening flow. Each of the angles in the representation of the total absolute curvature as a sum decreases monotonically, except at the instants when two consecutive inflection points reach the same angle or position as each other and are both eliminated. Therefore, the total absolute curvature can never increase as the curve evolves. For convex curves it is constant at 2 and for non-convex curves it decreases monotonically.
Gage–Hamilton–Grayson theorem If a smooth simple closed curve undergoes the curve-shortening flow, it remains smoothly embedded without self-intersections. It will eventually become
convex, and once it does so it will remain convex. After this time, all points of the curve will move inwards, and the shape of the curve will converge to a
circle as the whole curve shrinks to a single point. This behavior is sometimes summarized by saying that every simple closed curve shrinks to a "round point". This result is due to
Michael Gage,
Richard S. Hamilton, and Matthew Grayson. proved convergence to a circle for convex curves that contract to a point. More specifically Gage showed that the
isoperimetric ratio (the ratio of squared curve length to area, a number that is 4 for a circle and larger for any other convex curve) decreases monotonically and quickly. proved that all smooth convex curves eventually contract to a point without forming any other singularities, and proved that every non-convex curve will eventually become convex. provide a simpler proof of Grayson's result, based on the monotonicity of the stretch factor. has the shape of a
vesica piscis. Similar results can be extended from closed curves to unbounded curves satisfying a local
Lipschitz condition. For such curves, if both sides of the curve have infinite area, then the evolved curve remains smooth and singularity-free for all time. However, if one side of an unbounded curve has finite area, and the curve has finite total absolute curvature, then its evolution reaches a singularity in time proportional to the area on the finite-area side of the curve, with unbounded curvature near the singularity. For curves that are graphs of sufficiently well-behaved functions, asymptotic to a ray in each direction, the solution converges in shape to a unique shape that is asymptotic to the same rays. For networks formed by two disjoint rays on the same line, together with two smooth curves connecting the endpoints of the two rays, an analogue of the Gage–Hamilton–Grayson theorem holds, under which the region between the two curves becomes convex and then converges to a
vesica piscis shape.
Singularities of self-crossing curves Curves that have self-crossings may reach singularities before contracting to a point. For instance, if a
lemniscate (any smooth
immersed curve with a single crossing, resembling a figure 8 or
infinity symbol) has unequal areas in its two lobes, then eventually the smaller lobe will collapse to a point. However, if the two lobes have equal areas, then they will remain equal throughout the evolution of the curve, and the isoperimetric ratio will diverge as the curve collapses to a singularity. When a locally convex self-crossing curve approaches a singularity as one of its loops shrinks, it either shrinks in a self-similar way or asymptotically approaches the grim reaper curve (described below) as it shrinks. When a loop collapses to a singularity, the amount of total absolute curvature that is lost is either at least 2 or exactly .
On Riemannian manifolds On a Riemannian manifold, any smooth simple closed curve will remain smooth and simple as it evolves, just as in the Euclidean case. It will either collapse to a point in a finite amount of time, or remain smooth and simple forever. In the latter case, the curve necessarily converges to a
closed geodesic of the surface. Immersed curves on Riemannian manifolds, with finitely many self-crossings, become self-tangent only at a discrete set of times, at each of which they lose a crossing. As a consequence the number of self-crossing points is non-increasing. Curve shortening on a
sphere can be used as part of a proof of the
tennis ball theorem. This theorem states that every smooth simple closed curve on the sphere that divides the sphere's surface into two equal areas (like the seam of a
tennis ball) must have at least four
inflection points. The proof comes from the observation that curve shortening preserves the smoothness and area-bisection properties of the curve, and does not increase its number of inflection points. Therefore, it allows the problem to be reduced to the problem for curves near the limiting shape of curve shortening, a
great circle.
Huisken's monotonicity formula According to
Huisken's monotonicity formula, the convolution of an evolving curve with a time-reversed
heat kernel is non-increasing. This result can be used to analyze the singularities of the evolution. ==Specific curves==