New taxa Other cephalopod research • A study on the phylogenetic relationships of Cambrian and Ordovician cephalopods is published by Pohle
et al. (2022). • Putative
tentaculitoid Iwakiella ichiroi is reinterpreted as a
sphaerorthoceratid orthocerid cephalopod by Niko (2022). • A study on the identity of enigmatic black amorphous fossils often associated with belemnoid remains, based on the analysis of fossil material from the Upper Triassic (
Carnian) Polzberg
Lagerstätte (
Austria), is published by Lukeneder & Lukeneder (2022), who interpret the enigmatic fossils as likely representing the preservation of a mineralized and secondarily carbonized cephalic-ocular-arm-cartilage complex of the belemnoid
Phragmoteuthis bisinuata. • A study on structures interpreted by
Eduard Suess as beaks of
Phragmoteuthis bisinuata is published by Doguzhaeva
et al. (2022), who reinterpret the studied structures as cartilaginous remains of a prey, presumably juvenile fish; the authors also report a
gladius of a previously unknown
Carnian teuthid from the
Cave del Predil (
Italy), possibly similar to the
Permian taxon
Glochinomorpha stifeli, as well as an upper beak of a coleoid from the
Anisian Buchenstein Formation (
Italy), demonstrating typical coleoid upper beak morphology and composition, and interpreted by the authors as likely indicative of similar upper beak structure in
P. bisinuata. Their interpretation of purported beaks of
P. bisinuata as remains of a prey is subsequently contested by Lukeneder & Lukeneder (2022). • Belemnite species
Liobelus acrei, otherwise known from the latest Jurassic and Early Cretaceous of the Boreal Realm, is reported from the
Valanginian of the Vocontian Basin (
France) by Mutterlose, Picollier & Dzyuba (2022), who interpret this finding as evidence of an isolated immigration of belemnites from the north in the early Valanginian, and establish two taxonomically different faunas of
Tethyan belemnites. • A study on the age of belemnites from the lower
Santonian "Sponge horizon" of the Mozhzhelloovrazhnaya Formation in the Lower Volga region between Saratov and Volgograd (
Russia), some of which are interpreted as redeposited from middle and upper
Coniacian deposits on the basis of strontium, carbon and oxygen isotope data (with the first representatives of the genus
Belemnitella interpreted as late Coniacian in age), is published by Zakharov
et al. (2022). • Revision of the type specimens of
Eothinoceras americanum is published by Evans & Cichowolski (2022), who restrict the genus
Eothinoceras to the type species, and propose a new scheme for classification of the genera belonging to the order
Cyrtocerinida. • A study on the distribution of
nautiloids throughout the
Cenozoic is published by Kiel, Goedert & Tsai (2022), who interpret their findings as indicating that from the
Oligocene onward nautiloids became extinct in areas where
pinnipeds appeared, while cetaceans (with possible exception of
simocetids and
agorophiids) were not found to significantly affect the demise of nautiloids. • Fossil material of
"Kummelonautilus" taiwanum is described from the Miocene Houdongkeng Formation (
Taiwan) by Goedert, Kiel & Tsai (2022), who provisionally transfer this species to the genus
Nautilus, and review the fossil record of the genus
Nautilus in the Indo-Pacific region. • A study on the external and internal morphology, affinities and ecology of
Vampyronassa rhodanica, based on data on soft tissue of specimens from the
La Voulte-sur-Rhône (
France), is published by Rowe
et al. (2022). • First cephalopod
statoliths from the Lower Cretaceous of
Poland and
United Kingdom are described by Pindakiewicz
et al. (2022), who compare
Mesozoic statoliths to those of extant cephalopods, and find the closest resemblance between Mesozoic forms and statoliths of extant
idiosepiids. • A study on the fossil material of
Belosaepia from the Egemkapel Clay Member of the
Tielt Formation and the Roubaix Clay Member of the
Kortrijk Formation (
Belgium), applying micro-CT imaging to the studied fossils, is published by Goolaerts
et al. (2022), who identify growth lines in the studied fossils, and interpret their findings as indicating that the studied material belongs to representatives of a single species (
B. tricarinata). ==Bivalves==