Although the Nobel Prize in Literature is widely regarded as the world's most prestigious literary prize, the Swedish Academy has attracted significant criticism for its handling of the award. Many authors who have won the prize have fallen into obscurity, while others rejected by the jury remain widely studied and read. In the
Wall Street Journal, Joseph Epstein wrote, "You might not know it, but you and I are members of a club whose fellow members include
Leo Tolstoy,
Henry James,
Anton Chekhov,
Mark Twain,
Henrik Ibsen,
Marcel Proust,
James Joyce,
Jorge Luis Borges and
Vladimir Nabokov. The club is the Non-Winners of the Nobel Prize in Literature. All these authentically great writers, still alive when the prize, initiated in 1901, was being awarded, didn't win it." Other notable names from the non-western canon who were ignored despite being nominated several times for the prize include
Sri Aurobindo and
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan. The prize has "become widely seen as a political one – a
peace prize in literary disguise", whose judges are prejudiced against authors with political tastes different from theirs.
Tim Parks has expressed skepticism that it is possible for "Swedish professors ... [to] compar[e] a poet from
Indonesia, perhaps translated into English with a novelist from
Cameroon, perhaps available only in French, and another who writes in Afrikaans but is published in German and Dutch...". As of 2021, 16 of the 118 recipients have been of Scandinavian origin. The Academy has often been alleged to be biased towards European, and in particular Swedish, authors. Nobel's "vague" wording for the criteria for the prize has led to recurrent controversy. In the original Swedish, the word
idealisk translates as "ideal." The
Nobel Committee's interpretation has varied over the years. In recent years, this means a kind of idealism championing human rights on a broad scale.
Controversies about Nobel laureate selections From 1901 to 1912, the committee, led by the conservative
Carl David af Wirsén, assessed the literary quality of a work in relation to its contribution to humanity's pursuit of the "ideal."
Leo Tolstoy,
Henrik Ibsen,
Émile Zola, and
Mark Twain were rejected in favour of authors who mostly are little read today. Later, the prize has often been controversial due to the Swedish Academy's
Eurocentric choices of laureates, or for political reasons, as seen in the years
1970,
2005, and
2019, and for the Academy awarding its own members, as happened in
1974.
Nationality-based criticism was the first African-born writer to receive the award. The prize's focus on European men, and
Swedes in particular, has been the subject of criticism, even from Swedish newspapers. The majority of laureates have been European, with Sweden itself receiving more prizes (8) than all of Asia (7, if Turkish
Orhan Pamuk is included), as well as all of Latin America (7, if Saint Lucian
Derek Walcott is included). In 2009,
Horace Engdahl, then the permanent secretary of the Academy, declared that "Europe still is the centre of the literary world" and that "the US is too isolated, too insular. They don't translate enough and don't really participate in the big dialogue of literature." In 2009, Engdahl's replacement,
Peter Englund, rejected this sentiment ("In most language areas ... there are authors that really deserve and could get the Nobel Prize and that goes for the United States and the Americas, as well") and acknowledged the Eurocentric nature of the award, saying that, "I think that is a problem. We tend to relate more easily to literature written in Europe and in the European tradition." American critics are known to object that those from their own country, like
Philip Roth,
Thomas Pynchon, and
Cormac McCarthy, have been overlooked, as have Latin Americans such as
Jorge Luis Borges,
Julio Cortázar, and
Carlos Fuentes, while in their place Europeans lesser-known to that continent have triumphed. The 2009 award to
Herta Müller, previously little-known outside Germany but many times named favourite for the Nobel Prize, re-ignited the viewpoint that the Swedish Academy was biased and
Eurocentric. The 2010 prize was awarded to
Mario Vargas Llosa, a native of
Peru in South America, a generally well-regarded decision. When the 2011 prize was awarded to the Swedish poet
Tomas Tranströmer, permanent secretary of the Swedish Academy Peter Englund said the prize was not decided based on politics, describing such a notion as "literature for dummies." The Swedish Academy awarded the next two prizes to non-Europeans, Chinese author
Mo Yan and Canadian short story writer
Alice Munro. French writer
Patrick Modiano's win in 2014 renewed questions of Eurocentrism; when asked by
The Wall Street Journal "So no American this year, yet again. Why is that?", Englund reminded Americans of the Canadian origins of the previous year's recipient, the Academy's desire for literary quality and the impossibility of rewarding everyone who deserves the prize. == Similar international prizes ==