Critical reception The film was praised by critics upon its release.
Time Magazine predicted that
Little Women would “place Katharine Hepburn near the top of the list of U.S. box-office favorites”.
Motion Picture Herald expected its attendance to bypass the attendance of films from the last eleven months.
The Film Daily predicted that it would “get a rousing reception” and commented that “it seems as though the characters had actually come to life”.
Mordaunt Hall of
The New York Times wrote, "The easy-going fashion in which George Cukor, the director, has set forth the beguiling incidents in pictorial form is so welcome after the
stereotyped tales with stuffed shirts . . . The film begins in a gentle fashion and slips away smoothly without any forced attempt to help the finish to linger in the minds of the audience." He later rated it as #8 in the top ten best films of 1933.
Variety called it "a superbly human document, sombre in tone, stately and slow in movement, but always eloquent in its interpretations."
John Mosher of
The New Yorker declared it "an amazing triumph" and "a picture more intense, wrought with more feeling, than any other we are likely to see for a long time to come." The
New York World-Telegram credited the film "a stunningly clever job of recapturing on the screen all the simplicity and charm of its author", writing that Hepburn gave "an unforgettably brilliant performance and that once and for all she definitely proves how unlimited and effortless an actress she really is." The
New York American wrote, "at the moment, and for days, weeks, months to come, Miss Hepburn's characterization will stand alone on a pedestal of flaming brilliance."
Little Women has also received more recent critical attention. Tom Milne of
TimeOut Film Guide says that even though the film has “a rich vein of sentiment, . . . Hepburn’s Jo, making a subversive choice of what she wants her life to be, . . . ensures that the cosiness isn’t everything.” Film historian Charlie Keil comments that scenes where Hepburn alternates between feminine and masculine traits for Jo shows both her acting skills and Jo's acting skills. Author Anne Boyd Rioux remarks that Hepburn emphasizes Jo's tomboyishness to the point that it suppresses her feminine traits.
Leonard Martin’s Classic Movie Guide remarks, “[The] film offers endless pleasure no matter how many times you’ve seen it; a faithful, beautiful adaptation”. Little Women was voted one of the ten best pictures of 1934 by
Film Daily's annual poll of critics. The film was included by the
Vatican in
a list of important films compiled in 1995, under the category of "Art".
Little Women has an approval rating of 89% on
review aggregator website
Rotten Tomatoes, based on 18 reviews, and an average rating of 8.4/10.
Metacritic assigned the film a weighted average score of 92 out of 100, based on 7 critics, indicating "universal acclaim".
General reception RKO may have benefited from the fact that
Depression-era audiences were especially receptive of the film's evocation of life in a simpler and more innocent world. In addition, as studios had been criticized in 1932 and 1933 for violent and sexual themes, many viewers valued the film's conservative nature. Cukor's adaptation highlights the Marches' financial hardships. Viewers related to the financial struggles and simple way of life,
Accolades The film was nominated at the 6th Academy Awards for Best Picture, Best Director for Cukor and Best Adaptation, winning the latter. Katharine Hepburn was not nominated for Lead Actress for this film, but she was nominated for Morning Glory, for which she eventually won. == Adaptations and legacy ==